Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 02:11 PM Sep 2015

Should Bernie Sanders have Secret Service protection?

About a month ago, just after protesters from the Black Lives Matter movement shut down a Bernie Sanders rally, a citizens petition appeared on the White House’s “We the People” site, warning that the candidate was vulnerable to “potentially violent confrontations with disturbed people.”

Calling him a “leading Democratic presidential candidate,” the Aug. 12 request compared Sanders to candidate Barack Obama, who was granted early special protection from the Secret Service in 2007 because of increasing threats to his safety.

Sanders’s supporters also referenced (though not by name) his Democratic contender, Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has Secret Service detail because she was a former first lady.

“This situation must not be allowed to continue a moment longer,” the petition, signed by just under 10,000 people, (or around the size of a Sanders’ rally give or take), says. “Bernie Sanders must have immediate Secret Service protection, just as the other leading candidate does.”

(Quick aside: Protesters harassing candidates at campaign events is fairly common, and rarely, if ever, leads to violence. It’s unknown whether there have been any threats made to Sanders or his campaign.)

How White House hopefuls receive taxpayer-funded security is completely subjective. An advisory committee that includes the speaker of the House, House minority whip, Senate majority leader, Senate minority leader and one additional member chosen by the committee decides which presidential candidates should have Secret Service detail and passes the recommendations on to the Homeland Security Department.

It wasn’t until 1968, after Robert Kennedy was assassinated, that protection was expanded to cover “major candidates,” a distinction that has no real definition. Though, according to a 2000 Congressional Research Service report, there are certain guidelines the committee follows like the candidate must be declared (good start), has raised at least $2 million (who hasn’t these days?) and gets at least 5 percent support in national polls (well, that eliminates half of the GOP field).

In 2012, Secret Service agents were detailed to Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and later Newt Gingrich, during the GOP primary. This year, so far, just Clinton has the government-funded protection. Donald Trump pays for his own private body men. So does Jeb Bush.

Dan Emmett, a former Secret Service agent and author of “Within Arm’s Length: A Secret Service Agent’s Definitive Inside Account of Protecting the President,” is opposed to any candidates getting protection.

More here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2015/09/10/should-bernie-sanders-have-secret-service-protection/
___________________________________________________________________________

You can't tell what the billionaires might have in mind....

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should Bernie Sanders have Secret Service protection? (Original Post) Playinghardball Sep 2015 OP
Yes AuntPatsy Sep 2015 #1
No. He is not the nominee yet. yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #4
True but I still wish he could get it, I fear his safety considering whom he is up against AuntPatsy Sep 2015 #6
Personally I do to. It's just a shame that Repugs can't be mature yeoman6987 Sep 2015 #7
I'm loathe to put people into a security bubble. jeff47 Sep 2015 #2
Yes, absolutely! There have been OPs about it in the last couple months, to ask the WH. appalachiablue Sep 2015 #3
K & R !!! WillyT Sep 2015 #5
Undecided baran Sep 2015 #8
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
4. No. He is not the nominee yet.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 02:36 PM
Sep 2015

Hillary has it from a former position so she has met the requirements. Unless we want to have all 17 GOP candidates have protection to then no. You know once rules change for one, they change for all.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
7. Personally I do to. It's just a shame that Repugs can't be mature
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 04:02 PM
Sep 2015

And look at his situation without showing their jealousy and being a 4 year old saying he got more candy then I did type of scenario.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
2. I'm loathe to put people into a security bubble.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 02:14 PM
Sep 2015

Unless he starts getting credible threats, I don't think it would be good.

 

baran

(92 posts)
8. Undecided
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 04:23 PM
Sep 2015

I get nervous when I see him surrounded by large crowds; however, I think he likes to be accessible and to meet and talk to people face to face. I'd hate to see him insulated inside a security bubble. If he wants secret service protection, though, I think he should be able to request and receive it. But I think that would be a decision for him (and Jane) to make.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Should Bernie Sanders hav...