Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

merrily

(45,251 posts)
2. I saw that, but did not think he meant it as a dig. He's contrasting with Trump, who knows nothing
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 07:56 AM
Sep 2015

about political campaigns (or governing, for that matter).

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
5. 'Bernie Wouldn't Be Leading in Iowa Without You! Keep Building the Political Revolution!'
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 09:33 AM
Sep 2015
People For Bernie ?@People4Bernie 1h1 hour ago
Bernie wouldnt be leading in Iowa and New Hampshire without you! Keep building the political revolution #FeelTheBern




Robbins

(5,066 posts)
7. He still dismisses him
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 10:10 AM
Sep 2015

1:Trying to downplay bernie's strength In Iowa and NH
2:Still dismisses idea of bernie winning nomination
3:says if bernie wins it would be a 1964 or 1972 loss.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
8. First, a loss is a loss and a win is a win. Second, I am so tired of the McGovern-Mondale myths.
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 10:24 AM
Sep 2015
Enough swallowing political memes whole and unexamined, ffs.http://www.democraticunderground.com/12804651

1964? Please.



Admiral Loinpresser

(3,859 posts)
9. Nate Silver has already been embarassed once
Thu Sep 10, 2015, 11:20 AM
Sep 2015

and had to apologize about Bernie. He entirely leaves out the possibility that Bernie is comparable to FDR in 1932 or Reagan in 1980, proposing radical change and getting elected.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»OMG, Silvers' 538 saying ...