Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumThe empire strikes back: The media-political elite’s campaign to destroy Bernie and restore order
by ANDREW O'HEHIR
Last week the New York Times deigned to notice that Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont is running for president have you heard about this? and even by the Gray Ladys usual standard of treating everyone to the left of the Obama-Clinton Democratic center as a two-headed, kazoo-playing talking dog, it was quite a piece of work. Times reporter Jason Horowitzs dispatch from a recent Sanders rally in Dubuque, Iowa, barely even pretended to be a news article. It emanated tangible hostility from beginning to end sometimes veering toward distaste, sometimes toward mockery and was loaded with scare quotes and attack adjectives. Sanders was described as grumpy, angry, disengaged, uncharismatic, judgmental and suspicious of all things feel good, yet also, despite those unappealing qualities, as a cult figure surrounded by a circle of believers.
Sanders references to the corporate media were enclosed in ironical quotes what a ridiculous thing to say about the New York Times! and his refusal to engage with questions about Hillary Clintons perceived political liabilities was described, twice within two paragraphs, as disdainful. Toward the end of the article, Horowitz finally expends a single paragraph outlining Sanders proposals for single-payer health care, expanded Social Security, free college tuition and breaking up the banking cartel. Without quoting anyone or citing any sources, Horowitz then introduces the critique that none of these proposals is remotely plausible given the political realities in Washington, and describes the political future envisioned by the Sanders campaign as a fantasy scenario.
Now, there are valid reasons to be skeptical that Sanders will end up as the Democratic nominee, still less our next president. Hillary Clintons strategists seem well prepared for the likelihood that Iowa and New Hampshire will be close, and that Sanders could conceivably win one or both states. Clinton remains far ahead in national polls of likely Democratic voters, and is well positioned in many Southern and heartland states where Sanders is unlikely to compete effectively. She has huge amounts of conventional campaign funding plus super PAC zillions up her sleeve, and controls much of the local and state Democratic Party apparatus through her nationwide army of robot ninja assassins. (I exaggerate for effect: They arent technically robots.)
But that sneering Sanders character assassination in the Times, which sought not just to demean the candidate but his supporters and the entire American progressive tradition he represents, went far beyond that kind of conventional horse-race analysis. It felt less like an effort to report the news than an effort to shape the news. Im not saying that Horowitz was sent to Dubuque with specific instructions to rip Sanders apart with his glittering aperçus in the print edition, the articles pull quote read A call for an uprising comes with little belief that it will occur (oh, SNAP) because that wasnt necessary. Those instructions were undetectably but unmistakably present in the oxygen of the Times newsroom.
more
http://www.salon.com/2015/08/26/the_empire_strikes_back_the_media_political_elites_campaign_to_destroy_bernie_and_trump_and_restore_order/
djean111
(14,255 posts)Don't think this will have the desired effect. After all, we tea-bagger outsider types may not even read the Times.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)+1
marym625
(17,997 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)Now we are at stage 2, "Then they fight you!"
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)Shit outside the Box.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)coverage of elections as horserace. One smarmy young reporter, seemingly convinced of his industry's influence on our political system asked Sanders if he thought (paraphrase) picking a fight with the media was a winning strategy. I almost threw my sandwich at the screen. Our corporate media is the keystone in the archway of the fascist takeover of our country.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Thank you for posting it.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)We dont have enough time between now and the heat death of the universe to figure out all the reasons behind the media and political elites collective freakout of 2015. I think we can say a couple of things: Some of the reasons are obvious and some are less so, and no matter what happens in the short term, this shock to the system is a critically important moment for democracy. Ive said this before and Ill say it again: Donald Trump is not entirely a bad thing. Liberals who get the vapors, Danny Shea style, about what a national embarrassment Trump is are missing the point. We need a national embarrassment right now, or at least we need politics that break free of the tepid safety zone of bipartisan paralysis, dysfunction and apathy. Of course I dont actually want Trump to be president, but he serves a number of useful purposes and the forces trying to shut him down are the same ones seeking to shut Bernie Sanders down, the forces that long to ensure a boring, safe and utterly substance-free general election between Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton.
Through a confluence of material and ideological interests, the Western worlds financial powers and political parties and media organizations, along with the interlocking permanent governments sometimes called the deep state, have come together around a conception of political reality they describe as the only reality. This is the Washington consensus, a blend of postwar American foreign policy and Reagan-Thatcher economics: Globalized free trade and venture capitalism, government austerity, widespread privatization and developing markets, with the money flowing upward and cheap consumer goods for the so-called middle class. All of this enforced and policed, of course, by the behemoth blundering superpower that cannot understand why nobody loves it the way they used to.
Some of the people who constantly assure us that this reality is the only reality are just being cynical bastards and small-minded ideologues. (I dont know why this surprised me, but R.J. Cutlers 2013 documentary The World According to Dick Cheney revealed the former vice president, one of the most influential Americans of our time, as deeply incapable of introspection.) But there are plenty of other intelligent and reasonably well-meaning people who have been tube-fed the Kool-Aid of neoliberal economics and the Washington consensus since infancy, who are thoroughly convinced that center-right politics are the only viable politics, and who have effectively embraced a post-9/11 update of Francis Fukuyamas famous pronouncement that history ended with the Cold War.