Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forum'Bernie Sanders Speaks' In his most revealing interview...
In his most revealing interview, the socialist presidential candidate sets out his vision for America.
By
John Nichols
The Nation
Yesterday 6:00 am
....Big SNIP....rec clicking & reading full interview....
The Nation: Obviously, for a lot of those who have followed you, the economic issues, the populist message, is at the heart of your campaign. But when you talk about the crisis, you always include a discussion of climate change.
Sanders: Look, for those of us who believe in science, you simply cannot ignore what the scientific community is saying almost unanimously. And that is that climate change is real; its caused by human activity; its already causing devastating problems; and it will only get worse in years to come if we dont transform our energy system. You cannot ignore what is happening every day in terms of the climate and what it will meanwhat its meaning today to the folks in California and elsewherefor your kids and my kids. There is a moral responsibility that we must accept to transform our energy system. It cannot be ignored.
The Nation: As a candidate for president, would you refuse money from fossil-fuel companies?
Sanders: (laughing and speaking sarcastically) Well, let me seeits true the Koch brothers did send us a large check, and weve been debating whether to accept it or not. Of course, for us, its rather an unrealistic issue: a) I dont take corporate PAC money, and b) if, by some accident, some company sent us money, we would send it backabsolutely.
The Nation: A criticism directed toward you early in the campaign was that you were very focused on economics, but not sufficiently focused on critical issues such as police brutality and mass incarceration. Isnt this something you have to address?
Sanders: Clearly, police brutality and what goes on in African-American communities and other communities is a huge issue . The question is: How do you have police departments in this country that are part of their communities, not oppressors in their communities? How do you have police officers who, when they commit acts of crime, are held accountable and are indicted? How do you have police officers receiving the proper training that they need? How do we demilitarize our police departments? All of these are important issues. The good news is that, as a country, we are paying far more attention to this issue than we previously did. If anyone thinks that the kind of police brutality that were seeing now is something new, they are sorely mistaken. The good news, in a sense, is that its now becoming public and were seeing it and talking about it.
There has to be, I think, a significant change in police culture in terms of [the use of force]. That is a major issue that has to be dealt with. And we will deal with it, period.
The other thing, to be frank, that does trouble me is that there is so little discussion about African-American youth unemployment. How do you discuss Ferguson and not know that, in that particular community, unemployment is off the charts? How do you discuss Baltimore and not know that, in that particular community, unemployment is off the charts? African-American youth unemployment in this country is 50 percent, and one out of three African-American males born today stands the possibility of ending up in jail if present trends continue. This is a disaster. So, of course, weve got to talk about police brutality; of course, weve got to talk about reforming our criminal-justice system; of course, weve got to make sure that we are educating our kids and giving them job training and not sending them to jail. But I get a little distressed that people are not talking about what I consider to be a huge problem: How do you not talk about African-American youth unemployment at 50 percent?
The Nation: That focus on employment goes back to the historic message of the civil-rights movement. Civil-rights organizing was one of the ways into political activism for you, wasnt it?
Sanders: Civil rights was a very important part of it. I was very active in the Congress of Racial Equality at the University of Chicago. I got arrested in trying to desegregate Chicagos school system. I was very active in demanding that the University of Chicago not run segregated housing, which it was doing at that time. We were active in working with our brothers and sisters in SNCC [the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee] at that point helping them with some very modest financial help. So, yes, I was active. And I do not separate the civil-rights issue from the fact that 50 percent of African-American young people are either unemployed or underemployed. Remember the March on Washingtonwhat was it about? Jobs and Freedom. The issue that Dr. King raised all the time was: This is great if we want to desegregate restaurants or hotels, but what does it matter if people cant afford to go to them? Thats still the issue today.
...SNIP...
Full interview here~
http://www.thenation.com/article/bernie-sanders-speaks/
...Bill Clinton can also say he was active in racial inequality back in the day, just not in the PRO-active way Bernie was. Quite the opposite. Makes me wonder if the Hill Camp is putting Bernie on the defensive to subvert attention from that & of course the "hard working Americans...ahem...white Americans..." comment from Hillary in 2008.
Connecting the Dots
How Bill Clintons Welfare Reform Created a System Rife With Racial Biases
May 12, 2014
by Joshua Holland
http://billmoyers.com/2014/05/12/how-bill-clintons-welfare-reform-created-a-system-rife-with-racial-biases/
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 7, 2015, 08:10 AM - Edit history (1)
The whole article is great and explains a lot of where Sanders comes from.
marble falls
(57,093 posts)he is ignoring Black people????
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)marble falls
(57,093 posts)marble falls
(57,093 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Not to trying to feed a feud but imo it likely is partly about some people wanting Senator Sanders to not ignore them. This is politics so the concept of turf is a very real thing. You have to fight for it, you earn it with blood, sweat, and tears. You use your turf so you can advance your cause.
I think Sanders has been to the rodeo enough times that he understands the power structure of American national politics. And, if people are patient, they'll find that Sanders will respect those who've fought the good fight, and who've earned access to our candidates for office.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)We're so blessed to have Bernie, aren't we? The only thing I don't like is that Bernie won't go negative, as he talks about here. But Hillary's media group & many minions are negative against Bernie, putting him in continual defense mode, and the media doesn't bring to attention the many, many deep-rooted issues many in the Democratic party have with her candidacy that he could easily shine a light on.
That's the only fault I have with his positions. I think he's making a huge mistake.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)The media would love to make everything about Hillary Clinton. Bernie is not some stalking horse candidate whose only selling point is that he's not Clinton. Attacking her would just be a distraction.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Sort of cheapens the whole thing.
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)This is group is for supporters of Bernie Sanders.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Let it be about Bernie and not about the Clintons.
Just my opinion.
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Its a rather important contrast during the primary race. Especially when the HRC camp is trying to throw Bernie under the bus on the race issue.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Thank you, RiverLover!
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)My pleasure
Thanks for the R & K!!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)their strengths', it causes me to ask 'what were Bill and Hillary doing back then, they are of the same generation, were in college during those turbulent times and I cannot find anything to compare to Bernie's record.
I never thought of that before, but now I do. So maybe it's time to ask whether people want TALK or ACTION.
If they want ACTION, Bernie is their candidate. There is no question about that.
Jesse Jackson put it very well when he spoke about his second run for President: 'The only two White Elected officials who stood by me then were Bernie Sanders and Hightower'.
Talk is cheap. Jackson had decided at the time that economic inequality for the AA community was a huge issue and Bernie helped him get that message out. He personally took the time to introduce Jackson to his own state where Jackson eventually won.
Let them TALK but those who actually CARE know Bernie's record and will be there for him in this election as he was for them.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Very well said. Anyone can talk it, but Bernie has walked it. He didn't lead with it when he first began campaigning, but I think we'll be hearing more about it now.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)never goes anywhere and I wonder why. If I were not able to enthusiastically support my candidate I would reassess my support. It's hard for them because Hillary has been terrible on issues of great importance to this country. The only way they can deal with that apparently is to dismiss the entire Civil Rights Movement, which I actually saw today. How on earth can that help their candidate?