Check out kooky GD-P OP, "Sanders & Minorities" now; claims that he supports upper class,

[appalachiablue]

white, paternalistic males, straights, no minorities (but HRC does) and so on. Wild...

[Snotcicles]

1. It's like watching poo-flingers at the zoo. nt

[appalachiablue]

2. I guess so! One way of looking at it, although some of the charges are outrageous- HRC has had

women and minorities locked down for eons, really!

[Snotcicles]

3. Sanders is a new and better alternative, IMO. Things are changing. tick-tock. nt.

[appalachiablue]

9. Yep, and Sanders is helping with the change, for the better. Finally!

[djean111]

5. As a woman, I have always found the assertion that I must therefore be supporting Hillary

absurd. And pretty much short-sighted. More off-putting than inspirational, really. Supporting a candidate because of gender is not what Feminism was all about. Whoever thought that was a good campaign hook is not doing her any favors, IMO. I don't think demographic groups really vote in lockstep any more.

[Le Taz Hot]

6. It's actually pretty condescednding when you think about it.

Like we don't have the ability to look at ALL aspects of a candidate -- the only thing that matters is the correct plumbing.

[Snotcicles]

7. I hope your last point is correct. I wish to see an intellectual shift to your way of thinking. nt

[appalachiablue]

8. Agree-

[SoapBox]

4. I keep waiting for the claim of

illegitimate children.

Feel the Bern!