Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumwendylaroux
(2,925 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Over at Camp Weathervane, they have been calling Bernie a liar for quite some time.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)Personally, I won't ever cast my vote for anyone that hires David Brock and/or John Podesta to run their campaigns. Pure filth.
No way, no how is Hillary representative of Democratic values.
I'm forever grateful to Bernie Sanders for shining a light on the corruption in both parties.
Response to RoccoR5955 (Reply #5)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
Rebkeh
(2,450 posts)The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)I could name names, but sometimes i think they just sit out there with fingers hovering...waiting....waiting...to punce.. so sssshhhhhh
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)I know (after some careful research) who they are.
On DU I will stick to sssshhhhh.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)The Hill supporters attack on his honesty is one of the main reasons why I will never cast a vote for her.
Response to Nictuku (Original post)
Post removed
obamneycare
(40 posts)Amazon also has $600 million in contracts with the CIA, which Sanders said he wanted to abolish in 1974, and still had a lot of problems with. In the past, FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting) slammed the Washington Post for leaving out the fact that Bezos owns over $1 billion in Uber stock when reporting on the company.
nolawarlock
(1,729 posts)Bernie supporters post Fox News, Brietbart, New York Post and all sorts of other trashy right wing rags. The Washington Post certainly isn't on the level of that and has, traditionally, been a more mainstream, left-leaning paper.
obamneycare
(40 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Sun May 8, 2016, 12:24 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
I don't know ...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1280&pid=192493
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Invading a protected group to stir the pot. Isn't this what the Clinton group hollers about so loudly?
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun May 8, 2016, 12:31 AM, and the Jury voted 5-2 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This is a protected group.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Looks like it is being discussed in the thread, so I'll leave it.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Rude
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I would vote to hide crap like this even if the shoe were on the other foot.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: The WaPo. Oh please.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Had this reply been in GDP it could/would be just another post of no consequence. Had it been in the HRC group, not only would it be alerted on but have resulted in a ban. Hide the reply.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)God I miss the 5 hide timeout rule. Flagged for review at the moment.