What a poutrage!

[Xipe Totec]

Accusing Hillary of saying Bernie was not qualified to be President, when she merely implied it!

And besides, she said Bernie was slightly better than Ted or Donald, so that makes it all better.

Now chill.

[daleanime]

1. Yeahup.....

[notadmblnd]

2. She's so clever. Sander's supporters are so young and dumb.

They're too naive, inexperienced and unsophisticated to understand the nuances of dirty politicking. They're so clueless that they'll never catch on to her low life tactics.

[MrChuck]

3. The Washington Post said it implicitly

Based on their interpretation of her responses to that direct question.

It's clear but we should be aware of the origin of the argument against Senator Sanders.

Carry on.

[MrChuck]

7. You're absolutely correct.

I'm only pointing out that the WaPo article is still the only source I've seen that uses that very specific language. Everything else has been couched in something or other.
I don't see another way to interpret her responses on MJ. She clearly meant that his transcribed words proved that he was unqualified.

[winter is coming]

4. Poutrage with purpose. It gave the media something to talk about other than the Panama Papers. n/t

[Xipe Totec]

6. ...

[corbettkroehler]

8. Dellamaide: "Hillary Clinton’s ‘insurmountable’ lead is fuzzy math"

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511679841