Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernie Sanders

choie

(4,111 posts) Tue Apr 5, 2016, 09:42 PM Apr 2016

okay I admit I can be a conspiracy theorist

but according to the Times, it's now 52.4 to 47.4 (Bernie) - why did the media call it for Bernie so soon? It think it's a set up to paint Clinton as coming from behind and beating Sanders (if god forbid she wins...) There was no reason for them to call a winner so soon...

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

okay I admit I can be a conspiracy theorist (Original Post) choie Apr 2016 OP

Exit polls? nt dflprincess Apr 2016 #1

Didn't they learn anything choie Apr 2016 #2

The 2000 exit polls were proof of the fraud being committed dflprincess Apr 2016 #3

He's up by 8 with 35% reporting Depaysement Apr 2016 #4

dflprincess

(28,082 posts)

1. Exit polls? nt

Reply to choie (Original post)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 09:44 PM

Apr 2016

choie

(4,111 posts)

2. Didn't they learn anything

Reply to dflprincess (Reply #1)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 09:45 PM

Apr 2016

from the 2000 debacle?

dflprincess

(28,082 posts)

3. The 2000 exit polls were proof of the fraud being committed

Reply to choie (Reply #2)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 09:50 PM

Apr 2016

In countries where the elections have been monitored by the exit polls are used to determine if the elections were honest.

We need U.N. observers at our polls.

Depaysement

(1,835 posts)

4. He's up by 8 with 35% reporting

Reply to choie (Original post)

Tue Apr 5, 2016, 10:17 PM

Apr 2016

It's the same margin Emerson predicted yesterday.

Reply to this discussion