Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumA Dark Legacy: Hillary Clinton’s Role in the Mexican Drug War
Mexico, John M. Ackerman wrote recently for Foreign Policy, is not a functional democracy. Instead, its a repressive and corrupt oligarchy propped up by a blank check from Washington.
Since 2008, that blank check has come to over $2.5 billion appropriated in security aid through the Mérida Initiative, a drug war security assistance program funded by Washington. Negotiated behind closed doors in the last years of the Bush administration, the plan was originally proposed as a three-year program. Yet Hillary Clintons State Department pushed aggressively to extend it, overseeing a drastic increase of the initiative that continues today.
Much of this aid goes to U.S.-based security, information, and technology contracting firms, who make millions peddling everything from helicopter training to communications equipment to night-vision goggles, surveillance aircrafts, and satellites.
This aid comes in addition to the direct sales of arms and other equipment to Mexico authorized by the State Department, as Christy Thorton pointed out in a 2014 New York Times op-ed. Those sales reached $1.2 billion in 2012 alone, the last full year of Clintons tenure. Indeed, as the Mérida Initiative has grown, Mexico has become one of the worlds biggest purchasers of U.S. military arms and equipment.
But while sales have boomed for U.S.-based contractors, the situation in Mexico has badly deteriorated. The escalation of U.S. counter-drug assistance in the country has paralleled a drastic increase in violence, fueling a drug war thats killed more than 100,000 people since 2006.
State Complicity
High-profile human rights cases such as.............................................snip
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/03/a-dark-legacy-hillarys-clintons-role-in-the-mexican-drug-war/
The $1 trillion War on Drugs launched by President Nixon in 1971 created the Mexican drug cartels, now legalizing weed is killing them.
The Mexican drug cartels are finally meeting their match as a wave of cannabis legalization efforts drastically reshapes the drug trafficking landscape in the United States. It turns out that as states legalize cannabis use and cultivation, the volume of weed brought across the border by Mexican drug cartels dramatically decreases and is putting a dent in their cash flow.
A newly-released statistical report from the U.S. Border Patrol shows a sharp drop-off in cannabis captured at the border between the United States and Mexico. The reduction in weed trafficking coincides with dozens of states embracing cannabis use for both medical and recreational purposes.
In fact, as the Washington Post reports, cannabis confiscations at the southern border have stumbled to the lowest point in over a decade to only 1.5 million pounds. Thats down from a peak of four million pounds in 2009.
Speaking to Anti-Media, Amir Zendehnam, host of the popular cannabis show, In the Clear with Amir on Z420.tv, told us what he thinks of these new statistics:
Colorado, for example, is experiencing an economic boom .......................................snip
http://theantimedia.org/legalizing-weed-done-1-trillion-dollars-40-year-war-couldnt/
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Way to go, Ichingcarpenter!
Mbrow
(1,090 posts)It proves what has been said all along by the pro legalization people, "the best way to fight the war on drugs is to legalize it" This just makes the point in Spades.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign is holding fundraisers in Mexico on Wednesday, expanding its offshore money operation one day after the New Hampshire primary.
Two events hosted by the Clinton campaign treasurer Jose Villarreal will be held in Mexico City. Clinton herself will not be attending. One of the co-hosts of the fundraising dinner is Wal-Mart lobbyist Ivan Zapien, who relocated to Mexico with the company in 2015. Clinton served on the board of Wal-Mart from 1986-1992.
Overseas fundraisers are relatively common for leading presidential candidates, though Mexico City is not itself a common destination. Donors attending must assert that they are U.S. citizens or lawfully admitted permanent residents of the United States.http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/fundraising/268782-clinton-campaign-hosting-fundraisers-in-mexico
When it comes to funneling campaign contributions through donors, it's pretty damn easy, as Hillary has managed to do in NYC's Chinatown in her 2008 campaign. All donors, even those at Hill's multiple overseas fundraisers, must "assert" they are U.S. citizens. But the campaign organizations are on an honor system (LOL) to verify those assertions.
And while U.S. journalists tracked down the Clinton campaign's questionable donors in 2008 in NYC, what investigative reporters have the backing/financing/personal bodyguards necessary to track down the alleged donors in crime-riddled Mexico City? Pretty sweet deal for Hillary.
Hillary Clinton's Chinatown Tangle
Last June, Hillary Clinton's campaign gave back $7,000 to Chinese restaurant workers who contributed $1,000 apiece for a political fund-raiser. It was her campaign's token effort to stop a common campaign-finance abuse: the use of proxies by well-heeled donors trying to get around the $1,000 limit on campaign contributions. But however well intentioned, the effort points up the difficulty all of the presidential campaigns have in trying to police their political contributions.
The problem was that the low-paid restaurant workers did not seem capable of affording $1,000 donations and thus, it appeared likely, may have been used as proxies by other big donors. Yet the Clinton campaign did not reimburse another 15 restaurant workers including cooks, waiters, a dishwasher and cashier who also wrote checks for the April 13 event in New York's Chinatown. Nor did it send back money from a garment worker and phone card clerk, not to mention 15 donors who had failed to list any occupations or register to vote.
Few Chinese-American workers in New York City's several Chinatowns will reveal how much they really make. At the same time, it is not uncommon to see waiters and dishwashers among other so called menial workers who are capable of paying for cars, plunking down large initial premiums for insurance policies or making sizable down payments on homes or apartments in cash. The banks of Chinatown centered in Canal Street in Manhattan have combined deposits of $6 billion, behind only the ritzy Upper East Side ($8 billion) among New York City neighborhood.
That creates a particular problem in trying to figure out which donations are being funneled through proxies. Fund-raisers face pressure to gather large numbers of checks but have no responsibility to screen them. Fugitive businessman Norman Hsu drew attention to the $850,000 he bundled for Clinton because of some of the donations came from people of modest means.
http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1679979,00.html
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)We also wonder why we now have a heroin epidemic problem in the States and that branch goes to what the US did in Afghanistan. But its all from the same tree.
The Mena airport CIA dropoff for Coke into Arkansas during Bill's governorship in the 80s was a real deal and couldn't have happened without State and Federal clandestine support.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)No figures in history have had the Clintons' midas touch when it comes to turning disasters, tragedies, etc., into gold. They lay the foundations, and plant the seeds during their respective times in office and then reap the bounty via speeches and the Family Foundation's "facilitation" fees when either of them is out of office.
She says evolving, he says facilitating - let's call the whole thing off!