Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Three things that will make my year (Original Post) Feeling the Bern Feb 2016 OP
One thing EmperorHasNoClothes Feb 2016 #1
As if Trump gives a damn what you think! Glamrock Feb 2016 #2
I'd be good w/all 3 of those :) nt TBF Feb 2016 #3
That would be amazing! Question about Warren: welivetotreadonkings Feb 2016 #4
Eight years in a cabinet position, eight years in a do nothing VP job or at least 25 years Feeling the Bern Feb 2016 #5
Of course, no doubts there. welivetotreadonkings Feb 2016 #6
I can agree with #3. ladyVet Feb 2016 #7

EmperorHasNoClothes

(4,797 posts)
1. One thing
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 09:13 PM
Feb 2016

I would actually prefer that Trump didn't run as a third party candidate. It would just give the right an excuse as to why their candidate lost. If it's just two running head to head, the public preference will be clear.

Glamrock

(11,802 posts)
2. As if Trump gives a damn what you think!
Tue Feb 16, 2016, 09:28 PM
Feb 2016

He doesn't vote for losers, okay? And that Cruz is nasty guy, a nasty guy. Trump's a winner. And the RNC is in breach of their side of the pledge so...

4. That would be amazing! Question about Warren:
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 01:33 AM
Feb 2016

Forgive me for taking this scenario into a slightly different direction, but I'm curious about hearing peoples' opinions on something (and haven't been a registered user here long enough to post my own thread, haha, but I've been a visitor to this site for quite some time) ...
Bernie has said he wants to work with Elizabeth Warren if he got the nomination. Pretty vague, but-- lack of endorsements aside--they're natural allies and most would assume they would coordinate with one another in some fashion. If the SCOTUS position were out of the question, what would you folks envision her doing in an ideal world alongside a President Sanders? Obviously a lot of people have dreamed of having her be V.P., that would be so amazing, if she were willing. My only concern would be a General Election perception that both of them have too much of a common forte (income inequality, Wall Street, expanding Social Security, etc.) and would therefore lose the sense of balance that might be accompanied by someone who has more of an expertise in foreign policy and global politics.

Would you prefer her to remain in the Senate? She has done a lot of great things there, and a Sanders administration I'm sure would do what it could to strengthen the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In addition to this she could be a very strong ally to have in Congress, and could pressure other Democratic Senators to get their objectives accomplished.

Or would you think she would be more effective as a member of the cabinet, and if so, which position? I would assume most people could envision her as Attorney General, Secretary of the Treasury, or maybe Secretary of Labor?

Or, am I completely wrong about the Vice President perspective? Would it in fact be the best route for them?


I guess, to be concise, among these options and ones I may have missed, where do you think she would be able to implement progressive policies most effectively?

Looking forward to any responses or critiques.

 

Feeling the Bern

(3,839 posts)
5. Eight years in a cabinet position, eight years in a do nothing VP job or at least 25 years
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 03:28 AM
Feb 2016

on the SCOTUS.

I'll take the third choice.

6. Of course, no doubts there.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 04:22 AM
Feb 2016

I'm just wondering--if being a Supreme Court Justice were out of the question--what position in government do people sense she would be able to excel at and implement the most substantial changes? Or, do ya'll think she is needed more in the Senate? I've got my own opinion, just wondering what other people are thinking of.

Apologies for taking the conversation away from the 3 things that would make your year, believe me I would be 100% down for all of those as well.

ladyVet

(1,587 posts)
7. I can agree with #3.
Wed Feb 17, 2016, 07:32 AM
Feb 2016

But I'd rather Elizabeth stay in the Senate, where she'd be far more helpful to Bernie.

I'm not sure O'Malley would be a good VP. I don't know anything about him or his term as governor. I'd never heard of him until some people here started putting his name out.

So, that's a:

01: Maybe.
02: No.
03: Yeah, it would make for some fireworks, and guarantee a Dem win due to splitting off votes for whichever loser gets the R nomination.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»Three things that will ma...