Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumThree things that will make my year
01: Sanders/O'Malley ticket.
02: Warren on the SCOTUS
03: Republican self-destruction over Trump running third party when either the Rubiobot or the Canadian Cruz gets the nomination.
EmperorHasNoClothes
(4,797 posts)I would actually prefer that Trump didn't run as a third party candidate. It would just give the right an excuse as to why their candidate lost. If it's just two running head to head, the public preference will be clear.
Glamrock
(11,802 posts)He doesn't vote for losers, okay? And that Cruz is nasty guy, a nasty guy. Trump's a winner. And the RNC is in breach of their side of the pledge so...
TBF
(32,102 posts)welivetotreadonkings
(134 posts)Forgive me for taking this scenario into a slightly different direction, but I'm curious about hearing peoples' opinions on something (and haven't been a registered user here long enough to post my own thread, haha, but I've been a visitor to this site for quite some time) ...
Bernie has said he wants to work with Elizabeth Warren if he got the nomination. Pretty vague, but-- lack of endorsements aside--they're natural allies and most would assume they would coordinate with one another in some fashion. If the SCOTUS position were out of the question, what would you folks envision her doing in an ideal world alongside a President Sanders? Obviously a lot of people have dreamed of having her be V.P., that would be so amazing, if she were willing. My only concern would be a General Election perception that both of them have too much of a common forte (income inequality, Wall Street, expanding Social Security, etc.) and would therefore lose the sense of balance that might be accompanied by someone who has more of an expertise in foreign policy and global politics.
Would you prefer her to remain in the Senate? She has done a lot of great things there, and a Sanders administration I'm sure would do what it could to strengthen the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In addition to this she could be a very strong ally to have in Congress, and could pressure other Democratic Senators to get their objectives accomplished.
Or would you think she would be more effective as a member of the cabinet, and if so, which position? I would assume most people could envision her as Attorney General, Secretary of the Treasury, or maybe Secretary of Labor?
Or, am I completely wrong about the Vice President perspective? Would it in fact be the best route for them?
I guess, to be concise, among these options and ones I may have missed, where do you think she would be able to implement progressive policies most effectively?
Looking forward to any responses or critiques.
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)on the SCOTUS.
I'll take the third choice.
welivetotreadonkings
(134 posts)I'm just wondering--if being a Supreme Court Justice were out of the question--what position in government do people sense she would be able to excel at and implement the most substantial changes? Or, do ya'll think she is needed more in the Senate? I've got my own opinion, just wondering what other people are thinking of.
Apologies for taking the conversation away from the 3 things that would make your year, believe me I would be 100% down for all of those as well.
ladyVet
(1,587 posts)But I'd rather Elizabeth stay in the Senate, where she'd be far more helpful to Bernie.
I'm not sure O'Malley would be a good VP. I don't know anything about him or his term as governor. I'd never heard of him until some people here started putting his name out.
So, that's a:
01: Maybe.
02: No.
03: Yeah, it would make for some fireworks, and guarantee a Dem win due to splitting off votes for whichever loser gets the R nomination.