Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RDANGELO

(3,433 posts)
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 02:27 PM Feb 2016

The Capehart photo thing - leave it alone.

No one is questioning the fact that Bernie was involved in the segregated housing issue in Chicago; therefore the spat over who is in the photo is meaningless, and Caphart is smart enough to know that. This is a Clinton trick to portray people beating up on a gay black man. Please just leave it alone.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

sarge43

(28,941 posts)
2. Sorry, but a label is not a shield
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 02:39 PM
Feb 2016

If a gay black man kites a shabby attempt at swiftboating, then he should be called out. Anyone who tries that should be called. This is one of the reasons people are so fed up with Rovian style politics.

As for questioning the fact, Congressman Lewis did imply it, else why did he walk it back Two major news outlets, WaPo and Time questioned it.

DaveT

(687 posts)
4. We are running against Hillary Clinton
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 03:03 PM
Feb 2016

not some guy nobody ever heard of.

I think that is what the OP is getting at and I agree.

Capehart is a tool, and deserves any amount of razzing -- but that does not do the campaign any good.

mak3cats

(1,573 posts)
5. The flap over who is in the photo is NOT meaningless...
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 03:06 PM
Feb 2016

...when it is being insinuated that Bernie is being dishonest or deceitful. And the insinuation is deliberate, and being flogged to death on the M$M. Capehart is a tool, and the fact that he is a gay black man has nothing to do with our contempt of him.

TTUBatfan2008

(3,623 posts)
9. I agree in a sense
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 03:42 PM
Feb 2016

No need to personally attack Capehart. But I also think it is 100% fair to ask him why he didn't talk to the photographer in the first place? It is a good question. I think he failed Journalism 101 in his initial reporting of this story.

LiberalArkie

(15,719 posts)
10. He cooked his own goose and that of MSNBC and WaPo.
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 03:47 PM
Feb 2016

I think the major spat will be between Capehart and the person who talked him into ruining his career.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
11. a gay black man
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 04:08 PM
Feb 2016

either we are working for equality and people being judged on the content of their character and not a particular label or we are not.

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
12. some of this stuff goes without saying
Sun Feb 14, 2016, 04:10 PM
Feb 2016

A Rovian trick is to make people protest too much , remember the Clintons are good at this crap .

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»The Capehart photo thing ...