Bernie Sanders
Related: About this forumWell girls and boys, I think the genie may be officially out of the bottle
Last edited Wed Feb 10, 2016, 05:13 PM - Edit history (1)
Not that it's time to sit back and start counting our chickens. But I think we'll only be seeing more and more like the below.
The snowball is rolling, soon to become an unstoppable avalanche.
(EDIT: Here are typical comments from a news site this morning, that prompted me to write the above.)
I had a micro-epiphany last night.
I can't stand Clinton, and have never trusted her. Too entitled. Too arrogant. Too . . .
However, I thought Sanders unelectable. Wild, non-implementable ideas, socialist tag, etc.
But I listened to his victory speech. Amongst the twice-too-long narrative, I was hearing all of the stuff I believe also. Make banking boring. Leave none behind. Sure, most ideas will crash and burn, but we can't let Reflublican resistance make it so that we don't even TRY. Bernie will try. Clinton will not.
Also, I thought about my fears about lack of foreign policy experience. I counted back presidents, and looked for it pre-term. I came up with H-W being VP and CIA director, Eisenhower in WWII (focussed on UK and France), and then nothing back to the founding fathers. So Bernie would be status quo. He'd bring in some people.
Starting to feel the Bern . . .
LikeReplyShare
3
(Removed)
My dad watches FOX and thought Bernie was basically Hitler. He also saw the speech, and also thought Bern was speaking for him. It's amazing how easy it is to mis-characterize someone in this day in age.
retrowire
(10,345 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)The more people listen to Bernie the more they like him.
Really, it's getting boring. Bernie needs to get radical!!
<big grin>
[font color=white]
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Hitler. Anyone who listens to Fox News will be told he's like Hitler. Time for your dad to turn off Fox.
Bernin4U
(812 posts)That I think we'll be seeing more and more of.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)They were shocked because they were told by other Hillary supporters that his speeches were 100% Hillary bashing.
The media blackout was that effective.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)In fact, most of the time, he'll speak about "the establishment," but not about any one person directly.
Goes to show one should do his/her own research.
tblue37
(65,391 posts)debates he complains about questions that focus on criticizing her rather than on real issues.
tblue37
(65,391 posts)wants to can hear Bernie speak at any time online. They don't have to wait for him to be covered by the MSM. They can also watch the debate online, even if they are infrequent or inconveniently scheduled. I think one reason Bernie appeals to younger voters is that they *do* go online to hear him and to check out his website, so they know what he is about.
But I find it truly sad that so many people are so politically passive that they sit and wait for their TV pundits to tell them about a major presidential candidate.
Martin O'Malley was even worse served by the media blackout, because by the time he got into the race, the online oxygen had already been sucked up by Bernie's fire. It should not be that hard for candidates to get their message out, even without the cooperation of the corporate media, but it is because US voters are so disengaged and passive. That is who comprises the army of low-information voters--those who can't be bothered to find out information on their own but simply wait like baby birds for inevitably biased opinions to be crammed like worms down their gullets.
Bernin4U
(812 posts)Whether it's a subject of any actual interest to them or not, if it's not being covered in the MSM, then it must not be worth looking into.
Why people want to give a flying leap about what CNN, or MTV, or Academy of Motion Picture Arts want to force down our throats, is a mystery to me. 90% of it is junk food.
Really, it's just a herd mentality. People are more comfortable knowing they're in the majority. Which is why we heard so much more about HRH's polling early on, than anything of actual significance. "You should like HRH because she's the most popular." No thanks.
The flip side is that those who are quickest to jump onto a bandwagon are also the quickest to leave it. Things can remain dormant or under the radar for days, weeks, months, years. Then a switch is triggered, and it goes "viral" practically overnight. Things like popularity tend to grow exponentially much more than linearly.
Which is why it's dangerous to look at projections as a linear function. Bernie's spark has turned into a serious forest fire, and if HRH doesn't find a way to contain it immediately, her whole kingdom will be going up in smoke.
tblue37
(65,391 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)he's off Faux because it's too liberal he went to The Blaze but even that is wearing off. not sure what he watches now. Big issue with my dad he's always been anti Jew. Even if his brother married one. and like father like daughter naturally she married someone from outside the USA (Mexico) and I've told that one before he refused to go to her wedding ( I did he didn't) had a tendency when I was younger to say Hitler wasn't that bad of a guy. and neverending on Walt Disney. He's that sort of guy. Bernie will never win him over. He's tea party. He's no libertarian. They aren't the same thing. Rand Paul used to be more Tea Party but he's becoming more Libertarian as time goes on. Maybe he'll be Ron Paul someday. Ron who actually likes Bernie's stances on Wall Street
Zambero
(8,964 posts)At the end of the day, regardless of who gets the nomination, the degree to which the Democratic Party unites behind its candidate will determine whether or not a Republican gets into the White House, a scenario that is almost too grim to contemplate.
It seems Bernie's message goes over well once people have a chance to hear his message first-hand. Kudos to your Dad for being open-minded in the face of an ongoing propaganda assault. Hopefully many more will see the light as well.
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)He's an Independent, and hadn't decided yet.
One night at dinner, he announced that he didn't really care too much for "that Bernie guy". The media had named Sanders a "Socialist", and he didn't have a prayer. My only response was "How can you say that if you haven't been paying any attention to him?"
He's paying attention now. There are countless others out there like my husband. Encourage them to hear Bernie's message.
By the way, he has since decided that Bernie best represents him. I didn't even have to quit serving hot meals.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)japple
(9,828 posts)tempered husband. One day, after he had been ranting about something to her over the phone, she said, "I think we're having cereal tonight for supper." She had a cross to bear on many fronts (special needs child, insensitive boss, money woes, overbearing husband) and I applauded her for refusing to cook a hot supper for someone who never appreciated the sweet, lovely woman he'd married.
barbtries
(28,798 posts)earned you a heart
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)tblue37
(65,391 posts)Joe Nation
(963 posts)And I don't like political dynasties be they Clinton or Bush. But, someone will have to tell me which state they see Bernie winning next. I can't see one he has a shot in. He put all his efforts into Iowa and New Hampshire. Now what?
padfun
(1,786 posts)Probably most of them.
You know, a black man with a "Kenyan" name will NEVER win a state.
druidity33
(6,446 posts)Response to Joe Nation (Reply #10)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
marlakay
(11,470 posts)From WA state so they love him. CA my state Bernie folks everywhere.
I think Ohio, Penn, New York, i can think of plenty.
artislife
(9,497 posts)We have a real superdelegate problem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Democratic_Party_superdelegates,_2016#List
All Washingtonians need to flood their inboxes, post on local site to get the them to switch to undecided until WE vote on March 26th!
Suzan Del Bene
Denny Heck
Jay Inslee
Derek Kilmer
Rick Larson
Jim McDermott
Patty Murray
Adam Smith
Maria Cantwell
Bernin4U
(812 posts)Patty and Maria have endorsed her? I'm assuming so, but haven't actually seen it.
From what I've seen, it's hard to imagine HRH would win if the caucuses were next week, let alone next month. Those officials will need to get out of their bubble!
artislife
(9,497 posts)I have already slammed Patty and Maria for their TPP votes.
I actually scraped 250 together to go to a luncheon with both of them and Al Frankin. This was not cheap for my purse. So I told them I was rethinking my automatic votes for them.
Bernin4U
(812 posts)Bernie is only the first step.
Live I've said elsewhere, you don't bring a superstar athlete into your team and expect them to fit right in and work miracles. You have to reconfigure a new system around them. It often means that some veterans may no longer fit in. So sorry, we appreciate your years of dedication, but this is not about you, it's about the team.
If Bernie represents the will of the people, whoever still have trouble to get behind him are only showing themselves to be no longer a good fit.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Paulie
(8,462 posts)His team has been in the ground for quite a while in the next two. Keep at it and he can win.
http://www.msnbc.com/andrea-mitchell-reports/watch/rep-clyburn-on-clinton-v-sanders-race-620320323606
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/videos/2016-02-05/tad-devine-sanders-has-a-chance-to-win-in-nevada
greymouse
(872 posts)I was listening to someone or other on some radio station today (long long drive home refer to Hillary's time as Secretary of State as part of her experience. Here is a clue, unknown lady: Reducing a basically middle class country like Libya to a civil war hellhole overrun by ISIS is not on the positive side of the ledger.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)That's why we NEED to nominate Bernie. He has crossover appeal. Hillary is a repellent.
.
tblue37
(65,391 posts)process in frustration and hopelessness, while also attracting independents, many of who were once Democrats but left the party because of its rightward drift. He also doesn't motivate the RW base to come out against him the way Hillary would.
His ability to give hope to ordinary people that their concerns might be listened to could bring a lot of new and/or lapsed voters out, as Obama did, which can also help with downticket races, especially since he usually emphasizes the need to get Dems into office to cooperate with him in enacting his agenda.
Meanwhile, most Republican voters don't trust Trump, but his 27% seems not only solid but actively hostile to the other candidates, epecially those favored by the establishment Republicans. If Trump is nominated, many relatively sane Republicans won't vote for him, and some would actually vote Dem to prevent Trump from becoming president. But at least part of Trump's fanatical base would probably refuse to vote for an establishment approved candidate if they think Trump was cheated out of the nomination.
However, the split in the Repub voter base is likely to disappear if Hillary is our nominee, because they are united in their virulent hatred of her, which has been stoked endlessly over the past 25 years. If it is Hillary, even Trump's fans will hasten to the polls to vote agsinst her. Hatred and rage are among their most powerful motivators, and Hillary provokes those emotions in them like no one else.
Lorien
(31,935 posts)"As the token conservative of the group, I want to tip my hat and congratulate Sanders and all of you. You guys picked a good-hearted man and you backed him early and with conviction.
For somewhat self-serving reasons I want him to win the nomination (Clinton has a much better chance at beating kasich or Rubio). But I also want him to win because it's always good when sincerity and transparency beats the machine. Therefore, congratulations on your victory.
I'm still not feeling the bern, but I am feeling a rash that's starting to spread and itch."
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)as I felt during BHO's speeches during his campaigns.
I definitely want to hear more of them.
Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)Exactly. I'm NOT voting for the 'No we can't' candidate.
I never thought I'd see the day when a candidate ran, in the DEMOCRATIC primary, who came out against education and healthcare being rights for everybody, not just for the elites like them.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Myth one:
"Only younger, uninformed voters like Bernie"
I had breakfast with a group of retirees last week. Out of the 9 older, white male retirees, 8 expressed support for Sanders.
Myth two:
"women" are HRC supporters"
I have not yet found an HRC supporter among any females that I know. All are talking about Sanders.
Myth three:
"what Sanders proposes will never pass"
The same thing was said about female suffrage, and civil rights, and marriage equality, and many other issues.
Bluzmann57
(12,336 posts)I am 58 yrs. old. My elderly mother is a Sanders supporter as is my dad. They are 85 and 82. And last I heard, my mom is a woman. So that puts lie to the myth that Sanders has no older people or older women supporting him.
Very simply put, what we all want is a better America. This is still the greatest country in the world with potential to become even greater. That's why people are hearing Bernie.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)But the rallies, the donations, the votes say otherwise.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Exactly