Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:49 AM Feb 2016

don't bother trying to engage hillary supporters about the supers

there was a post in hillary group about how, if it were sanders, would be just fine with rigging. i got banned by cha for saying this:


i would not be happy if the shoe was on the other foot. i would not want to see bernie win because he had to be propped up by the establishment. the winner should be the person the most people voted for. the superdelegate practice is the most UNdemocratic thing i have ever seen, and will disappear once dws and her cronies are out.

but as to the election, its a moot point. they will support the winner unless they want to lose their own jobs and see the end of the dem party.

namaste

there was nothing negative about hillary herself, just the rigged process that they are pushing to get her in.

guess i am in good company now!!

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
don't bother trying to engage hillary supporters about the supers (Original Post) restorefreedom Feb 2016 OP
Welcome.. disillusioned73 Feb 2016 #1
thx..i am 498 restorefreedom Feb 2016 #2
You committed heresy. You were critical of DWS The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2016 #3
i wondered if the dws comment would upset someone restorefreedom Feb 2016 #4
Just wondering.. disillusioned73 Feb 2016 #5
Click the "about this group" while in the group Paulie Feb 2016 #7
500 banned?? alcina Feb 2016 #8
You're the 5th ban since yesterday Paulie Feb 2016 #6
wow...its a wave! nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #9
I'm not worried about the superdelegates n2doc Feb 2016 #10
I believe, restorefreedom... postin4Bern Feb 2016 #11
its hard to lose, that is for sure. nt restorefreedom Feb 2016 #12

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,719 posts)
3. You committed heresy. You were critical of DWS
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 11:59 AM
Feb 2016

and her undemocratic cronies. You may not say these things. The process must not be described as rigged, because it benefits Hillary. If it benefits Hillary it is good.

I haven't been banned from that group but that's only because I never post there. I did get a warning early on for a very mildly critical remark and never went back. So I'm kind of self-banned.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
4. i wondered if the dws comment would upset someone
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:01 PM
Feb 2016

but since it was not she-who-must-not-be-questioned, i didn't think it would get a ban.

oh well, up to almost 500 now!

Paulie

(8,462 posts)
7. Click the "about this group" while in the group
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:06 PM
Feb 2016

Compare here to there. Especially the number of "subscribers".

alcina

(602 posts)
8. 500 banned??
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 12:44 PM
Feb 2016

And only 294 subscribers. That is some exclusive group! I wonder how many people they've cut off in real life....

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
10. I'm not worried about the superdelegates
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:09 PM
Feb 2016

If Bernie continues winning, there is no way on earth Clinton will be the nominee. She is already imploding and she ain't seen nothin yet!

 

postin4Bern

(64 posts)
11. I believe, restorefreedom...
Wed Feb 10, 2016, 01:29 PM
Feb 2016

...that the term is "sour grapes". I expect those grapes to turn to vinegar as Bernie continues to win more and more states.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»don't bother trying to en...