Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:12 PM Feb 2016

WaPo: "Sorry, Hillary: You are the establishment"

By Danielle Allen February 5 at 4:41 PM

Danielle Allen is a political theorist at Harvard University and a contributing columnist for The Post.

After Thursday night’s debate, I’ve got a piece of unsolicited advice for Hillary Clinton. Don’t use this line again: “Senator Sanders is the only person who I think would characterize me, a woman running to be the first woman president, as exemplifying the establishment.”

The problem with the remark is obvious. Clinton does not merely exemplify the establishment. She and her husband, former president Bill Clinton, are the Democratic Party establishment. We’re in the realm of description, not characterization. That candidate Clinton could deliver her line with a straight face goes to the heart of her trustworthiness problem.

She really believes she can put a line like that over on us?

Bernie Sanders is right that Clinton’s long list of endorsements represents her muscle within the Democratic Party.

So ’fess up, Madame Secretary. You are the establishment. Playing the gender card can’t get you out of it. If anything, it only makes the disavowals weirder. My guess is that, despite this year’s anti-establishment waves, voters will ultimately tolerate your establishment status. It’s certainly more tolerable than a straight-faced claim that the pearls don’t fit.

Full column: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/sorry-hillary-you-are-the-establishment/2016/02/05/0aa7cf80-cc27-11e5-a7b2-5a2f824b02c9_story.html
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo: "Sorry, Hillary: You are the establishment" (Original Post) Mufaddal Feb 2016 OP
And apologize to Geraldine Ferrara for Usurping first woman to run for President, never accurate . orpupilofnature57 Feb 2016 #1
Ferraro was Mondale's running mate. sarge43 Feb 2016 #4
thanks for this list hopemountain Feb 2016 #17
You're welcome sarge43 Feb 2016 #18
Sorry, and Thanks . orpupilofnature57 Feb 2016 #21
No--first woman to run for president was Shirley Chisholm n/t eridani Feb 2016 #20
Thank You For Sharing These Truths cantbeserious Feb 2016 #2
"I can't be apart of the establishment! I'm a woman!" retrowire Feb 2016 #3
+ 1000000000000 !!!!!!!!!!! orpupilofnature57 Feb 2016 #5
And said with a straight face. passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #11
Well, if the gender card does not work, there is always the 9/11 card. Helen Borg Feb 2016 #6
Belly laugh, thanks. eom Got it Feb 2016 #9
Margaret Thatcher... SoLeftIAmRight Feb 2016 #7
It's not WaPo. It's a WaPo columnistt/op-ed. Editorially, WaPo is Hillary all the way. thesquanderer Feb 2016 #8
It was run on WaPo Mufaddal Feb 2016 #12
K&R nt Duval Feb 2016 #10
Carly Fiorina is a woman too Hillary. ErikJ Feb 2016 #13
If she thinks Sanders is the only one who calls her "establishment"... AlbertCat Feb 2016 #14
K&R nt Live and Learn Feb 2016 #15
Claire McCaskill is also claiming to be stunned to be called the establishment, she was opposed to Bluenorthwest Feb 2016 #16
My understanding is that McCaskil is one of the richest US senators. avaistheone1 Feb 2016 #19

sarge43

(28,941 posts)
4. Ferraro was Mondale's running mate.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 04:42 PM
Feb 2016

The first woman to run for the Democratic Party's nomination was Cora Wilson Stewart in 1920. The first woman to make a significant run was Shirley Chisholm in 1972.

Margaret Chase Smith was the first Republican woman, 1952

Many women have made third party runs.

Yeah, Clinton should apologize to Stewart and Chisholm

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
17. thanks for this list
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 11:37 PM
Feb 2016

been trying to remember shirley chisholm's name and could not.

shame on hillary. she believe's she is all that and a bag of chips?

thesquanderer

(11,990 posts)
8. It's not WaPo. It's a WaPo columnistt/op-ed. Editorially, WaPo is Hillary all the way.
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:20 PM
Feb 2016

It would be like taking a Krugman headline and attributing it to the NY Times.

Mufaddal

(1,021 posts)
12. It was run on WaPo
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 05:54 PM
Feb 2016

I was just trying to attribute it correctly, not suggest that this is the view of their editorial board.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
14. If she thinks Sanders is the only one who calls her "establishment"...
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 06:08 PM
Feb 2016

.... she's much further out of touch than anyone guesses!

This seems the same as thinking quoting her and mentioning her record is an "attack".


God, she's so fake!

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
16. Claire McCaskill is also claiming to be stunned to be called the establishment, she was opposed to
Sat Feb 6, 2016, 06:34 PM
Feb 2016

LGBT equality until about 20 minutes ago, she's worth about 20 million bucks, she's a US Senator and she can't figure out why she's seen as the establishment?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Bernie Sanders»WaPo: "Sorry, Hillary: Yo...