Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,487 posts)
Fri Oct 27, 2023, 02:54 PM Oct 2023

Another question about jury - from DU3

There are four options: definitely broke the rules, definitely did not, and then kinds broke the rules and kinda did not.

Yes, these are my words.

So what is the difference? Are the "kinda" counted differently than the "definitely?"

Just curious


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another question about jury - from DU3 (Original Post) question everything Oct 2023 OP
Yes... the outcomes have different options getagrip_already Oct 2023 #1
My opinion intrepidity Oct 2023 #2

getagrip_already

(14,764 posts)
1. Yes... the outcomes have different options
Fri Oct 27, 2023, 02:58 PM
Oct 2023

If you answer definitely does not violate the rule, you then get to say if you think it was an honest mistake, a misunderstanding of the rules, or a blatant disregard of the rules. Something like that.

If you pick the squishy sort of answer, it ends there.

I don't remember what happens on a definitely breaks the rule case.

intrepidity

(7,307 posts)
2. My opinion
Fri Oct 27, 2023, 03:01 PM
Oct 2023

is that the "kinda" options will still result in the action, (hide or not), but may be used to evaluate future harsher penalty (suspension, ban) should enough transgressions persist.

Hopefully a mod or admin will stop by to clarify.

Latest Discussions»Help & Search»DU Community Help»Another question about ju...