Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 06:13 PM Aug 2012

Wow.

http://www.advicegoddess.com/archives/2011/07/08/watson_dawkins.html

When Women Confuse Being Asked Out With Being Raped At Knifepoint In An Elevator

It's amazing how an atheist can so easily make being a feminist sound like a religion.

There's been some brouhaha between a blogger who leads (and is known as) Skepchick (real name: Rebecca Watson) and Richard Dawkins that professor friends who follow me on Facebook have been asking me to comment on.

...

Men "sexualize" women. Ladies, they want to have sex with you, your sister, your sister's friend, your sister's friend's friend, the cashier, the waitress, the lady with the big luscious ass who's crossing the street, and her sister and her sister's friend. If men weren't like this, the planet would be filled with plants and cockroaches instead of human beings.

If it is troubling to you to be sexualized, stay home, or only leave the house in a big black burka.

...


So much noxious BS. So little time.

If you're curious, Google 'Dawkins muslima' and you'll see a variety of discussions on this particular example of a massive logic fail / derailing tactic / tired attempt to silence feminists.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wow. (Original Post) redqueen Aug 2012 OP
this sounded to me like it kinda made the point of my OP. to hold this up as an argument seabeyond Aug 2012 #1
Right? redqueen Aug 2012 #2
i think that larger point is, men argue sexualization or objectification doesnt even exists seabeyond Aug 2012 #3
It is messed up, redqueen Aug 2012 #4
"Advice Goddess" bongbong Aug 2012 #5
You don't say! redqueen Aug 2012 #10
Well thank god we have all those horny men around MadrasT Aug 2012 #6
It's a COMPLIMENT! redqueen Aug 2012 #9
What the fuck? ismnotwasm Aug 2012 #7
Oh trust me, most atheists and skeptics learned from the incident. redqueen Aug 2012 #8
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
1. this sounded to me like it kinda made the point of my OP. to hold this up as an argument
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 06:20 PM
Aug 2012

that there is no issues is truly inspiringly amazing, ....



redqueen

(115,103 posts)
2. Right?
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 06:25 PM
Aug 2012

This idiot thinks Dawkins's moronic 'Muslima' rant is worthy of anything... and most of her own comments are vapid and childish.

Un. Fucking. Real.

Talk about proving the point.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
3. i think that larger point is, men argue sexualization or objectification doesnt even exists
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 06:46 PM
Aug 2012

they have pretty much held their privilege up for all to see that they are clueless and an unwillingness to hear what is being said to them. so they hear an argument and can put up an article like this, full of misogyny, that a woman participates in, yes, and use it as argument. they are incapable of recognizing what they are using to make a point.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
5. "Advice Goddess"
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 07:27 PM
Aug 2012

That blogger is a libertarian. She has also shown evidence of being a racist in some of her replies to minorities.

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
6. Well thank god we have all those horny men around
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 08:34 PM
Aug 2012

to impregnate us whether we want it or not.

I mean, geez, I'd hate to think about how the species would die out and shit without those awesome mens' fierce sex drives.

ROFLMFAO.

Jesus Christ on rollerskates what a load of poppycock.

ismnotwasm

(41,980 posts)
7. What the fuck?
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 09:40 PM
Aug 2012

That was some passive aggressive shit right there. ' AdviceGoddess? Weird.

So she wants to slam some feminist skeptic she 'vaguely' knows about, but follows on twitter, who was slammed by a-sometimes-amusing-but-still-a-chronic-asshole, kind of half-ass slams the asshole, goes back to her hard to parse out, WTF critique of the skeptic feminist and ends with a Tidy little Moral of the story? Fuck that. Quotes her 'daddy' even. Clearly some major issues there. I recommend immediate therapy to wash out the self hate.

Dawkins is a self-serving prick who I don't pay attention to. His comments about what I'd expect from that creepy little man.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
8. Oh trust me, most atheists and skeptics learned from the incident.
Mon Aug 6, 2012, 09:44 PM
Aug 2012

Those who didn't have a clue before, anyway.

Sadly, a desperate and deluded few still struggle to comprehend what the words 'misogyny' and 'sexism' mean.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»Wow.