Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Related: About this forumBoo!
RADFems!
I've never seen such Right Wing framing being allowed on DU, than I do on this subject.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1931 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Boo! (Original Post)
boston bean
Jun 2012
OP
An Australian lesbian feminist scholar and political activist..... Fair question...
boston bean
Jun 2012
#2
is Camille Paglia representitive of the kind of lipstick fem in your forum? nt
seabeyond
Jun 2012
#7
yes. regardless of defining. rads, second, people are running scared what is that.
seabeyond
Jun 2012
#6
Whisp
(24,096 posts)1. Is Sheila Jeffreys representative of the kind of Radical Feminism in HoF.
hi and bye all.
I know I'm going to get my ass kicked out of here for even mentioning good ole Sheila and her kind ways.
boston bean
(36,223 posts)2. An Australian lesbian feminist scholar and political activist..... Fair question...
Sheila Jeffreys (born 1948) is a lesbian feminist scholar and political activist, known for her analysis of the history and politics of sexuality in Britain. She is a professor in Political Science at the University of Melbourne in Australia. Jeffreys's argument that the "sexual revolution" on men's terms contributed less to women's freedom than to their continued oppression has both commanded respect and attracted intense criticism.[1][2][3][4] Jeffreys argues that transsexuals reproduce oppressive gender roles and mutilate their bodies through sex reassignment surgery. Some of Jeffrey's other controversial positions are that lesbian culture has been negatively affected by emulating the sexist influence of the gay male subculture of dominant/submissive sexuality, and that women suffering pain in pursuit of beauty is a form of submission to patriarchal sadism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheila_Jeffreys
There are some lesbian separatists who believe this (and some straight feminists)..... I don't agree with it....
I assume the bold is the issue you want to highlight?
What say ye DU? Pipe in, speak out. I for one am very anxious to hear Whisps intellectual opinion on this subject.
Lord knows, we all want to be labeled by our sisters with the opinions of fringe groups.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)3. No, she's not, but for someone who is a host in the
feminist forum, you sure have a bug up your ass about feminists. Now go back to deriding feminist as one dimensional cartoon characters somewhere else.
boston bean
(36,223 posts)4. I know, huh?
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)5. + infinity
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)7. is Camille Paglia representitive of the kind of lipstick fem in your forum? nt
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)6. yes. regardless of defining. rads, second, people are running scared what is that.
love the picture.