History of Feminism
Related: About this forumfemen and P riot, two orgs run by men, degrading women, claiming womans voice.
They dont have the strength of character. They dont even have the desire to be strong. Instead, they show submissiveness, spinelessness, lack of punctuality, and many other factors which prevent them from becoming political activists. These are qualities which it was essential to teach them.
Mr Svyatski insists to Ms Green that his influence on the group is positive. However, when he is asked directly whether he started Femen to get girls, he replies: Perhaps yes, somewhere in my deep subconscious.
One of the Femen campaigners talks of the relationship between the women and the movements founder as being akin to Stockholm syndrome, in which hostages feel sympathy for their captors.
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/the-man-who-made-femen-new-film-outs-victor-svyatski-as-the-mastermind-behind-the-protest-group-and-its-breastbaring-stunts-8797042.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023591267
femen that strips women down, P riot that has women using a deragatory title on themselves to be the voice.... both orgs are "men feminist" running the show. we have had conversation WHY men cannot be the leader in a womans org. hmmmmm, lets see, why men cannot be the one to "guide" women speaking out for our issues.
femen article is in GD. and of course all those supporters do not show up once it is known it is a misogynist pig that runs the org, humiliating and degrading women every. step. of the way. but, i thought we ought to know what femen truly is. all about exploiting women by a man.
BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)I always thought that P Riot was a weird name...now I know why.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)because we oppose their political stance, or accepting misogyny on our team if we think it may have a "greater" good.
universally, it will never work. so if we see, feel, that it is sexist or misogynist, it is best to call it what it is, even if we think it is on our side. then look further. i hope this will be a lesson for many otherwise smart allies.
BlueToTheBone
(3,747 posts)I'm not willing to readily justify misogyny. Are you talking about the women who let a man tell them how to be a woman (again?)
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)when i do not want to point a finger at an individual, i use we, because as a collective group, we allow. though i and you are the voice that try to address the issue, i still put me in as a "we", human experience.
Arcanetrance
(2,670 posts)and said I was trying to appease a minority here.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)huge ass .... duh.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)True but (correct me if I'm wrong here) The women in those groups & their female supporters are helping the men exploit women also.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)in every day life.
women too, are part of the patriarchy.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)it some how benefits them.
I'm gonna tread lightly here because remember I was a stay at home mother of 4 young children & thought feminism would make me have to get a job on top of that????? It took me a while to catch on. Sometimes I can be a slow learner, lol.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)many of us will admit that we grew into this. we allow the men to convince us being a feminist is being unfeminine or ugly or frigid. that is the shame of the power of the oppressor. we still have a member on du that constantly uses images of "ugly" and "old" women to humiliate or demean the woman that speaks out. yet, he claims to be a feminist. though playing a womans sexuality absolutely to shut her up. the contradiction, hypocrisy, irony of it totally fuckin' amazes me.
so progressive.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)It's bad enough this shit was even pulled in the first place, let alone that it got so much support from women who should fucking know better.
And now we find out (confirmed, more like, cause FUCKING DUH) that this shit was all run by a man. The only mystery is his campaign against... which was it? Porn? Prostitution? How much do you want to bet this asshole is making money off it now and knows if its legal he'll make less.
So yeah, again, shut the fuck up.
Little Star
(17,055 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)that is who i am and was one of the few (hof) speaking out against this shit and being attack from the supposed liberal/progressive minded on du.
so i am kinda ya, and no..... not so simple
redqueen
(115,103 posts)they are generalizing out of necessity due to the majority being blindly racist in so many ways. White people who make the constant effort to check their privilege and ensure they're not reinforcing racism know they're not the majority being referred to.
Just as when feminists say "men do x", men like Jackson Katz know they are likely not in the majority of the group being referred to.
Same principle here.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)what i saw on our very small sampling was just the opposite. when it came to sex positive, femen, p riot, it was not the middle aged/middle class white woman that was defending. we were the ones being attacked, for the most part. if you go thru the list of who we were having the conversations about.
what i am saying is i get that it is easier for the white middle class woman to speak out against things and they are seeing it from their perspective. right on. that is the part i agree with.
what i am disagreeing with is was it really the white middle class woman. i am really kinda thinking not.
and i have take a position if i think i see a wrong that may not be particularly popular at the moment, but may still very well be wrong.
and then again, maybe it is just the small sample size i am seeing that is effecting my perspective.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)love to hurl the "white middle class second wave feminist" invective because they're fucking morons.
In the real world, the big picture shows that it is mostly white, privileged liberals who take that stance. But it serves their interests to spread disinformation, so that's what they do.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)about adn that is exactly what i get to see.
i do not get to see
so, are you sure it is out there, or are we maybe creating something that is not there. cause i am not seeing the steinmans of the world creating this. again, this would be more in line of what this group truly is, HOF and learning, studying what we are talking about. i am far from being in the academic or greater picture, maybe, of feminism. or maybe i do not any longer see there is this real world. the feminism i see is the "real world" of the net movement.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)There's a piece up right now about the idea of reclaiming the word "slut"... or maybe I read it on tumblr... either way, yeah, it's there and it's consistent.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)or, are we being lazy in our accusations. the reason i am saying this is because i know in the early years it was the white middle class that had the feminist voice and thru history, and insightfulness, study, we have addressed and continue to address this.
but, it seems to me that a lot of the white middle class women are now aware of the issue, have progressed, learned and grown and are working hard not to make this misstep again, and to be more open to other voices.
if this is the case, i would rather honor the intent of right, instead of creating an illusion of wrong that is not a reality.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)And what I've seen evidence of time and time again are privileged, not necessarily middle-class, white women, pushing so hard on these issues. Not all white, not all middle class. But all coming from a position of privilege, either due to their race or their financial status.
That doesn't mean all white liberal feminists are doing this, just that of those who do focus on this stuff, most are white, privileged, liberal feminists. There are many white feminists and privileged feminists doing the opposite, but they don't make up the majority of those feminists the way they do the pro-porn, pro-objectification, pro-prostitution activists.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)I just try to stay aware outside my own privilege. I know you do that as well. But privileged people have to work at and be uncomfortable about certains truths or points of view to gain understanding. There are those who don't bother; and that is a problem
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)thing.
i think it was a HUGE misstep in the past, and i was not around feminism at that time so i was not walking it. further, i was a child. but.... since walking into feminism i see that it happened and there is an ABSOLUTE reason to call it out. damn straight. along with white privilege. male privilege. i get what that is about. i am all over being aware of it. and i am often reaching otu to get the perspective of the person walking it, to progress my own views since i am not walking it.
the thing. this was used as a weapon against us a couple years ago. it was not valid. we were being told we were not open, as i saw all around that is exactly what we were, open. insisting, demanding help in understanding yet just accusations and not conversation. unfortunately a whole battle was devised of them against us for exactly this argument when it did not exist.
that is what i am suggesting we honestly look at.
if you see it... damn straight. call it every. single. fuckin. time. and if i misstep? call me out please, i have to learn and grow. that is all we are asked of in life.
but... do not use it as a tool when it is not there.
and i am jsut not seeing it coming from the white privilege. that is not where i am seeing it. though, as i say, i will look.
but, as a white middle class woman, as i have an obligation, so does the accuser.
then we all move forward.
no way am i denying there is privilege. no way.
ismnotwasm
(41,984 posts)Discuss and problem solve, but don't let the growing pains of feminism allowed to be tools of divide and conquer, right?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)so it is not like he really got the issue of prostitution even if he was opposed and further, his position whatever it was, was very buried and had to be searched out. wasnt like it was a forefront of their message.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Femen, aka, CLASSICAL FEMINISM IS DEAD ALSO LOOK AT OUR BOOOOOBS, turns out to have been founded and controlled by a man named Victor Svyatski.
Outed by Australian film-maker Kitty Green, she says: Its his movement and he hand-picked the girls. He hand-picked the prettiest girls because the prettiest girls sell more papers. The prettiest girls get on the front page that became their image, that became the way they sold the brand.
I swear I dont want to go all I TOLD YOU SO SUCKERS but seriously. We talked about this.
We talked about the fact that the whole point of Femen was to capture the male gaze, thereby capturing the attention of the media. We talked about the fact that we should be skeptical anytime anyone makes reference to a new face of feminism and that face is either lingerie, something about pole dancing, or boobs. We talked about the fact that if a dude posts a photo of boobs and tells you its feminism, its not.
All feminists who are smart and unfooled by the self-objectification-is-empowerment crap and who havent come down with a bad case of burlesque-brain like the rest of the third wave also knew better than to fall for the Femen garbage. So now is the time we all join together and rub this news obnoxiously in the faces of every dumbo who fell for this crap. WE TOLD YOU AND WE ARE RIGHT AND YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT EVERYTHING FOREVER AND ALWAYS. Oh do we sound gloaty? Do you not like that? DONT CARE. Feminism needs smarty-pants gloaters more than porn-loving FEMINISM IS ABOUT LOOKING HOT AND SEXY AND DOING WHAT WE WANT FUCK YEAH mush-brains. Also! Feminism isnt here to give you a boner. If it is giving you a boner you may want to question whether or not thats because this feminism is actually porn in a very sexy nurse outfit shoddy disguise.
...
http://feministcurrent.com/7963/femen-was-founded-and-is-controlled-by-a-man-exactly-zero-people-are-surprised/
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)ya. i am all like, ya, i do want to be the one to say it.
ok, the writer clearly does not mind saying it later in the article.
WE TOLD YOU AND WE ARE RIGHT AND YOU ARE WRONG ABOUT EVERYTHING FOREVER AND ALWAYS.
bah hahahaha. i do love this writer. lol. i think i just posted this as a reply to another not long ago. lmFUCKINao
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)ah man.... now what are our selective group of feminist men gonna do....
You knew when the feminist haters were loving on FEMEN something was seriously wrong.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)in feminism.
ah... and calling women that spoke out prudes, frigid and ugly attacking our sexuality while exploiting womens sexuality was a give away also.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)How so many missed that clue, I have no idea... well, no... actually I do. It's just an ugly truth to have to recognize.
ismnotwasm
(41,984 posts)About the thousands of clothed women protesting in Tunisia, now do they?
Thousands of women.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)Was there any discussion of The Burka Avenger here?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/witw/articles/2013/08/07/the-ridiculous-burka-avenger-backlash.html
"burlesque-brain"
SUCKERS
ismnotwasm
(41,984 posts)I even went looking on-line when that whole thing started for the man behind the curtain. Couldn't find 'em.
Figgers.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)So are the minds of a lot of booby-obsessed faux-men-ists.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)the voice of women so i did not want to .... you know. i like what you posted.