Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Related: About this forumGender Policing the Vegan Woman
(I am not a vegan; I found this article interesting as the author very articulately points out that even in the "anti-speciesism" movement, sexism prevails. It may be very interesting to vegan feminists, I've read a number of great essays by women involved in that movement)
Advocating on behalf of other animals is a political protest that is often hugely influential to a womans self-identity. But to challenge the institution of animal use is to challenge the institution of male dominance. On one hand, women who take on masculine traits in their advocacy are met with hostility. On the other, women who perform their gender appropriately are not taken seriously due to their femininity. Many academics have been critical of PETAs sexual objectification of female advocates, but only a handful has discussed the sexism that structures the movement as a whole. Even fewer on-the-ground advocates have touched on gender discrimination and policing. For the most part, the female experience is omitted from animal liberation discourse.
Race politics, too, tend to go ignored in Nonhuman Animal rights claimsmaking. A June 6, 2013 post on an anti-speciesism website, Free From Harm, urges readers to help stop the practice of live sushi, which they call barbaric, vulgar and a shame to the Japanese people. I responded with the suggestion that such a campaign reinforces structural racism. Sensationalizing particular acts of cruelty committed by people of color encouraging prejudice and facilitates a sense of white superiority. I received a response very similar to my work against sexism. Advocates, who were mostly white, attacked me viciously, accusing me of playing the race card for intentional trouble-making. One even diagnosed me with a mental disorder.
While race plays an important role in the repertoire, people of color are often tokenized. That is, especially atrocious manifestations of racism (like slavery) are drawn upon to make a case for anti-speciesism. Yet, as Dr. Breeze Harper has theorized, the current experiences of people of color are ignored or denied in vegan outreach efforts. Major organizations pay little to no attention to the reality of environmental racism, food deserts, and ongoing human abolitionist advocacy. While Harper and other vegan women of color have been vocal about this marginalization, the Nonhuman Animal rights movement tends to operate as though in a post-racial society where enslavement and discrimination are a thing of the past. This post-racial position presumes that everyone has equal access to vegan alternatives and present-day people of color are disconnected from their history of colonization and racism.
History has shown us that women can prove a powerful force in advocating for social change. Yet, in the social movement arena, what tactics and measures are considered legitimate and helpful are still managed closely by men (and the women socialized to support them). The Nonhuman Animal rights movement has an added layer of complexity in that speciesism is an offshoot of patriarchy and the movement itself maintains a patriarchal hierarchy of command. Policing femininity and omitting feminist critique has the unfortunate consequence of reinforcing sexist stereotypes and limiting womens potential contributions. This omission makes building bridges to other social movements difficult. Ultimately, the movements conception of oppression is fragmentary and anti-speciesism is left anything but inclusive.
Race politics, too, tend to go ignored in Nonhuman Animal rights claimsmaking. A June 6, 2013 post on an anti-speciesism website, Free From Harm, urges readers to help stop the practice of live sushi, which they call barbaric, vulgar and a shame to the Japanese people. I responded with the suggestion that such a campaign reinforces structural racism. Sensationalizing particular acts of cruelty committed by people of color encouraging prejudice and facilitates a sense of white superiority. I received a response very similar to my work against sexism. Advocates, who were mostly white, attacked me viciously, accusing me of playing the race card for intentional trouble-making. One even diagnosed me with a mental disorder.
While race plays an important role in the repertoire, people of color are often tokenized. That is, especially atrocious manifestations of racism (like slavery) are drawn upon to make a case for anti-speciesism. Yet, as Dr. Breeze Harper has theorized, the current experiences of people of color are ignored or denied in vegan outreach efforts. Major organizations pay little to no attention to the reality of environmental racism, food deserts, and ongoing human abolitionist advocacy. While Harper and other vegan women of color have been vocal about this marginalization, the Nonhuman Animal rights movement tends to operate as though in a post-racial society where enslavement and discrimination are a thing of the past. This post-racial position presumes that everyone has equal access to vegan alternatives and present-day people of color are disconnected from their history of colonization and racism.
History has shown us that women can prove a powerful force in advocating for social change. Yet, in the social movement arena, what tactics and measures are considered legitimate and helpful are still managed closely by men (and the women socialized to support them). The Nonhuman Animal rights movement has an added layer of complexity in that speciesism is an offshoot of patriarchy and the movement itself maintains a patriarchal hierarchy of command. Policing femininity and omitting feminist critique has the unfortunate consequence of reinforcing sexist stereotypes and limiting womens potential contributions. This omission makes building bridges to other social movements difficult. Ultimately, the movements conception of oppression is fragmentary and anti-speciesism is left anything but inclusive.
http://thefeministwire.com/2013/06/gender-policing-the-vegan-woman/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1832 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gender Policing the Vegan Woman (Original Post)
ismnotwasm
Jun 2013
OP
BainsBane
(53,038 posts)1. I find this ad disgusting
Far more offensive than typical PETA ads, which never bothered me.
Tumbulu
(6,292 posts)2. The whole vegan thing has always
Given me the idea that it is more about devaluing the female (in all species), and the PETA campaigns really reinforce this idea for me.
ismnotwasm
(41,998 posts)3. PETA is horrid (trigger warning, very offensive photo)
The picture I posted does absolutely nothing for their ideology, and they love to use that kind of imagery
And this is just unspeakable: