Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
1. yes. an already a "i dont see it". not sexist. i saw you in the thread with obama eye roll
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 06:25 PM
Jan 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2251143

to see what was said. once you heard it, it was clear it was sexist and reason for eye roll. i have too many men tell me, just a joke. not offensive. not sexist.

we hear this bullshit all our lives. we arent laughing. just the men. chuckle, chuckle, wink and a jab in the ribs.

pretty damn clear.

i really do not think hillary is running, though. just putting it out. i know others are talking about it.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
2. Not surprised about the denial
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 06:28 PM
Jan 2013

I hadn't seen that thread, but I knew I didn't want to post this one in GD. I knew what I'd get.

I hope Clinton does run for the Presidency. She's be amazing.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
4. again, i appreciated that post. it gave me insight. copy and paste last post.
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 06:43 PM
Jan 2013

actually, you know what that OP did for me. hearing the realities of a month of shit....

it made me understand more what the general was saying, leaving women out of combat puts them in more danger. women in the middle of that shit and lack of hygiene along with men totally makes more sense in reducing sexual assault. psychologically, i can see the respect factor and one and the same, as a group, as they all go thru it.


WASHINGTON (AP) — The nation’s top military officer says he believes the rise in sexual assaults in the military is linked to a longstanding ban on women serving in combat roles — a ban the Pentagon is now eliminating.

Gen. Martin Dempsey is chairman of the Joint Chiefs. He said Thursday the assault problem is due partly to the military’s separate classes of personnel — male ‘warriors’ versus the rest of the force, including women.

Dempsey says the sexual assault problem is more complicated than that, but he indicates the disparity between the roles of men and women in the military has created a psychology that lends itself to disrespect for women.

Treating the genders equally, he says, is more likely to lead people to treat each other equally.



http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014379679

monmouth3

(3,871 posts)
5. Maybe after this "hearing" it will give her incentive to run anyway. 2016 is a long way off in
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 07:04 PM
Jan 2013

politics, she'll be rested, feisty, and hopefully ready to take it on..

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
6. it will be the same ride as obama and i personally feel
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 07:34 PM
Jan 2013

though we do not get everything we want, obama has done well and will continue on the right path. she will be the same, i believe. would be easy to walk into. she would be an easy win too, i think. biden is there also. how old is he? he is 70. that would put him at 74. 80 after 2nd term. doable.

but we have so many dems....

edit... i would go hillary. dont know if i would do biden for pres. well, i would if he is what is up. totally

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)
7. It won't really work this time.
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 07:40 PM
Jan 2013

They can try but because of the War on Women a lot of previously passive women (and some men) have finally noticed that there is a problem.

auntsue

(277 posts)
11. I was PO'd by
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 09:09 PM
Jan 2013

the headline I saw: "Hillary flips out"................damn...........I saw the thing............she was merely assertive...................scared of strong women....that's what they are!!!!

ismnotwasm

(41,986 posts)
15. Yup
Thu Jan 24, 2013, 11:07 PM
Jan 2013

Saw this piece at Shakesvile, with that picture.

(At the end of the article)

After months of claiming that Clinton was avoiding them, and using those dishonest claims to justify their ridiculous screaming about a "cover up!", Clinton showed her integrity by calling their bluff. She appeared before them to testify like they purportedly wanted all along—and when the pitiful facade of some massive government cover-up was crushed into little pieces, all they had left was their standard fallback: Misogyny.



http://www.shakesville.com/2013/01/gop-caught-off-guard-by-clintons.html?m=1


Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»History of Feminism»So it starts again