Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
History of Feminism
Related: About this forumThe Performance of Masculinity.
(i love this man in the video)
One of the primary reasons that boys and men gay bash and bully queers is that they need to perform masculinity in order to show the world that theyre in the Box. And since very few guys can always be in the Box for their entire lives, the trick is to act like you are in order to cover for any lapses. In effect, the performance of masculinity requires constant vigilance to make sure that nobody sees any missteps. Since the logic of the box is an either/or, youre either all the way in or youre all the way out. On the other hand, all of the words on the outside fit into one of three groups: gay, female, loser. I think that says pretty interesting things about homophobia and sexism. The way I think of it, those are the bricks that make up the Box and shame is the mortar that holds it together. The Box is one of main reasons why men harass women on the street and why catcalling and violence tends to escalate when men are in groups. Since the Box is hierarchical as well as performative, the guy at the bottom of the heap is at risk of being cast out. So each guy has to compete with the others in order to not be the one whos outside the Box. And as each ones performance becomes more vigorous, it forces the others to do the same.
*
So the notion that masculinity is fleeting and requires vigilant reinforcement isnt new to me, but theres some new research to back it up. Time Magazine has an article about a new paper, Precarious Manhood and Its Links to Action and Aggression, in which the researchers looked at the ways that men deal with the fleeting nature of manhood. Men have to constantly prove and re-prove their status, as they showed in three experiments. In the first, participants finished 25 sentences that began A real man or A real woman and they reported that:
Findings revealed that men, but not women, described a real man with more fleeting actions than enduring adjectives, and they described a real woman with more enduring adjectives than fleeting actions. Notably, this pattern emerged when we controlled for the gender-stereotypical content of the sentence completions. When men completed real man sentences with gender atypical content (e.g., A real man cooks dinner), they still used action language to do so. Thus, men define their own gender status in terms of the active things that men do rather than the ways that men are.
*
Theres a difference between having understanding and compassion for the men who are trapped in the Box and cutting them slack. After all, it isnt as if the dude in the Box is giving any slack to women, queers, transgender or genderqueer folks, or for that matter, heterosexual cisgender men who refuse to pretend to be Real Men. And cutting men slack is another way of coddling them instead of helping them learn to let go of the Box and discover the freedom that comes from being who you are. Having compassion without coddling people is fierce. Its powerful. And it requires the ability to hold onto both the fact that the Box hurts us all and that it gives heterosexual cisgender men privilege. Its also worth noting that this isnt the effect of gender. Its the effect of a limited and limiting ideas of what gender means. Its the result of rigid rules of masculinity, of fag bashing, of homophobia and sexism and gender-based violence. Its the result of kyriarchy. And yes, its the result of how weve created gender, but it isnt the effect of gender.
As this blogger said,
I dont have slack to offer men. What I have is the alternative to a life spent swallowing ones emotions and feeling a constant anxious insecurity where ones contended self-esteem should beand that seems a lot more valuable to me than slack.
http://www.charlieglickman.com/2011/05/the-performance-of-masculinty/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1385 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Performance of Masculinity. (Original Post)
seabeyond
Oct 2012
OP
ismnotwasm
(42,019 posts)1. Interesting phases in this paragraph
Unfortunately, while masculinity is pretty delicate, the construct of Box is quite resilient. When I get up in front of a group and start talking about it, I immediately put myself outside of the Box because the guy in the Box doesnt talk about it. The difference, of course, is that I reject the entire notion of the Box. Ive learned to pick and choose what aspects of masculinity work for me and which ones dont, since some of the things in the box are positive or at least dependent on ones relationship to them. In effect, Ive queered the Box but to the guy whos stuck in it, the only place he can imagine me being is outside the Box. And hes so used to not listening to those men that its hard for my message to get across. That makes the task of helping get rid of the Box really difficult.
Feminists have been saying similar things for years, it's very, very good to hear this from a male POV
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)2. i agree. more and more men are speaking otu against this restriction understanding it is as
detrimental to their health and authenticity as well as women.
i know that is how my boys see it.
i know my hubby, two brothers and father have not been able to get out of that box.
but, it is all interesting.
what i really like is:
Well, it helps explain why so many men resort to violence when they think that their masculinity is threatened- its an easy way to demonstrate that theyre in the Box. And it also shows how delicate masculinity can be. If all it takes to hurt it is braiding someones hair, it has to be pretty fragile.
i do not understand why men have such a tough time understanding this. that in their mind it is a definition of strong, masculine, but the reality that we all see is weak and fragile.