2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumComparing these Sanders' and Clinton's favorability/unfavorability charts shows why Clinton loses
the general election, but we eliminate that risk by nominating Sanders:
zappaman
(20,606 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)I've explained this over and over.
Theory of Reasoned Action. Very well understood description of the connection between attitudes, and behavior.
But I would hate to stop you from posting this same set of useless charts over and over as if they actually predicted anything.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)you are right. Otherwise, you're blowing smoke:
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Bernie will not beat Hillary in the primary.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... is to ask them who they plan to vote for.
The time to ask them other questions is when you don't like the result you get when you ask them who they plan to vote for.
Oh, the bowing us totally up to you.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)And he can't.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)X Squared Plus Four Equals A Sanders WIN!
Then watch as the HRC Camp/DWS/Establishment scramble as the wheels come flying off!
Bernie is Lovable, Very Informed, and has Demonstrated Good Judgement as well as Sincere with a 50 year History of being Someone that People understand they can... TRUST!
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)I'm pretty sure you'll have been "scrambled" by then.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)The previous folks you posted about show their numbers on election day. Bernie hasn't faced Republican criticism yet. Hillary has.
If we are unlucky enough to nominate Bernie, when the Republicans get finished with him, he will be at -25 on election day.
Hillary will be pretty much where she is now or better.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)You just say this and expect us to believe you?
Bernie will garner Independents and some Republicans where Hillary has much less cross-over appeal.
I asked but you had nothing that the Republicans can throw at Bernie as an example of what will crush him.
Come on, inquiring minds want to know?
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)THAT IS THE Problem with Hillary... It IS The History of... "Clinton Incorporated!
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)So no, you dont have to believe ME.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)And the fact that Sanders hasn't been the target - and Clinton has, and yet has had consistent favorability - doesn't bode well for Sanders.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:23 PM - Edit history (1)
And the other 10% weren't nearly as devastating or serious as the RW propaganda mill made them out to be.
But Bernie's supporters happily parade the bullshit out as of it's truthful, new, relevant - or even representative of progressive ideals. And they try to justify this reprehensible behavior by claiming "we mustn't elect a real Democrat like Hillary because the Republicans might say something mean about them! Vote for the fake Democrat instead!"
Berniestas crawl into the pigsty with the pigs, then pretend they're covered on rose pedals in an attempt to convince everyone else they smell sweet. But they're really just covering themselves in the same stinking muck as the RWers they claim to oppose.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base."
Was that quote or the contrary film footage which unequivocally disproves that quote "made up of whole cloth by the GOP?" The Republicans had no hand in this -- she made this shit up herself.
I like Clinton and if she is our nominee I will forgive her errors, but let's not pretend that Clinton played no role in her well earned poor marks for dishonesty and untrustworthiness.
Shall we go one-by-one through the not-made-up-by-Republicans incidents of documented fabricated self-aggrandizement or can we please just agree that HRC has occasionally collaborated in the attacks on her honesty by making shit up from time to time?
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Last edited Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:18 AM - Edit history (1)
That have nothing really to do with the issues.
I'm not going to try to refute every RW lie that's been advertised by RW propaganda. Getting into the nitty-gritty trying to do that while they come up with some other bit of bullshit is exactly what the RW wants! The fact that supposed progressives on DU don't recognize it for what it is, and instead are helping the RW is astonishing to me. Every time.
You should have realized by now that the reason Bernie isn't a target of this RW lie machine isn't because of his inherent honesty and integrity - it's because he hasn't been a national figure for 30 yrs and isn't the front-runner for the nomination. If you want Bernie to win the nod & win the Presidency - just wait.
vkkv
(3,384 posts)Did you try posting this at Hillary Humpers ?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Mail Message
On Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:54 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
K&R
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=989546
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Hillary Humpers? Let's keep DU free of childish name-calling. Hillary supporters are not Humpers and Bernie supporters aren't Humpers either.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:59 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I can't wait until the primary season is over.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The poster s referring to a website. Websites don't have feelings.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I'm all for the free exchange of ideas but I won't allow this to turn into a feces flinging match. Poster should be ashamed. Hide It.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I am a Bernie supporter. But this language is inappropriate.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: "Name calling" of a website is hurtful? Websites have developed emotions? Alerter, do better, really.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
vkkv
(3,384 posts)the way Bernie "wags his finger"... made no points about how Bernie faces the issues, they just don't like his fingering "wagging"...
You see, now THAT'S HOW you pick a candidate!
Ask Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)With Sanders, we will win back the senate and maybe even the house. Easy choice, right?
Blue_Adept
(6,402 posts)Only voting will tell!
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)So I guess that those who "feel" differently may want to acquaint themselves with who is strategically the better choice: Sanders.