Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Comparing these Sanders' and Clinton's favorability/unfavorability charts shows why Clinton loses (Original Post) Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 OP
That's nice. n/t zappaman Jan 2016 #1
These abstract surveys are not predictive of anything. JoePhilly Jan 2016 #2
Not predictive?! If predictive in 8 of the last 9 presidential elections is "not predictive" then Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #3
Prepare to be wrong. JoePhilly Jan 2016 #4
Yes, we'll all bow to her highness once you crown her but don't we have to vote first? Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #5
The best way to predict how people will vote ... JoePhilly Jan 2016 #6
Yes. And in the general, more people say they'll vote for Bernie over Trump, than Hillary over Trump reformist2 Jan 2016 #17
Doesn't matter if he can't beat Hillary. JoePhilly Jan 2016 #22
Lets Talk in THREE Weeks... The Trend Clearly Favors The Senator from Vermont! KANDR! CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #24
Let's talk in 3 months. JoePhilly Jan 2016 #26
As I pointed out in another OP there is a critical problem with this post stevenleser Jan 2016 #9
As I pointed out in another OP... tecelote Jan 2016 #20
Hillary Rather Than Having Crossover appeal Has Instead Crossover Antipathy! CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #25
Someone else responded to you that Nate Silver has this on his polling tips. stevenleser Jan 2016 #27
This shows that 30 yrs of RW propaganda has had an effect. baldguy Jan 2016 #7
Hillary has collaborated by providing an awful lot of kindling to fuel that propoganda Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #8
Bullshit. 90% of those "scandals" were made up of whole cloth by the GOP. baldguy Jan 2016 #12
"I remember landing under sniper fire" in Tuzla, Bosnia and "there was supposed to be some kind of a Attorney in Texas Jan 2016 #13
That's a perfect example of all the meaningless "issues" people have with Clinton baldguy Jan 2016 #15
+1 nt Skidmore Jan 2016 #18
K&R vkkv Jan 2016 #10
Jury results merrily Jan 2016 #14
Thank you Merrily. One poster over at the Hillary "group" actually said that she doesn't like vkkv Jan 2016 #23
Dodging sniper fire lie might have had an impact on her negatives. JRLeft Jan 2016 #11
With Clinton, we risk losing the White House. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #16
Lots of people feel the complete opposite Blue_Adept Jan 2016 #19
Polls tell us he has cross-over appeal, and her coattails are negative. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #21

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
2. These abstract surveys are not predictive of anything.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 01:48 PM
Jan 2016

I've explained this over and over.

Theory of Reasoned Action. Very well understood description of the connection between attitudes, and behavior.

But I would hate to stop you from posting this same set of useless charts over and over as if they actually predicted anything.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
3. Not predictive?! If predictive in 8 of the last 9 presidential elections is "not predictive" then
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:49 PM
Jan 2016

you are right. Otherwise, you're blowing smoke:

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
6. The best way to predict how people will vote ...
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:11 PM
Jan 2016

... is to ask them who they plan to vote for.

The time to ask them other questions is when you don't like the result you get when you ask them who they plan to vote for.


Oh, the bowing us totally up to you.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
17. Yes. And in the general, more people say they'll vote for Bernie over Trump, than Hillary over Trump
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 08:37 AM
Jan 2016

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
24. Lets Talk in THREE Weeks... The Trend Clearly Favors The Senator from Vermont! KANDR!
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 01:10 PM
Jan 2016

X Squared Plus Four Equals A Sanders WIN!

Then watch as the HRC Camp/DWS/Establishment scramble as the wheels come flying off!

Bernie is Lovable, Very Informed, and has Demonstrated Good Judgement as well as Sincere with a 50 year History of being Someone that People understand they can... TRUST!

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
9. As I pointed out in another OP there is a critical problem with this post
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:36 PM
Jan 2016

The previous folks you posted about show their numbers on election day. Bernie hasn't faced Republican criticism yet. Hillary has.

If we are unlucky enough to nominate Bernie, when the Republicans get finished with him, he will be at -25 on election day.

Hillary will be pretty much where she is now or better.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
20. As I pointed out in another OP...
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:10 AM
Jan 2016

You just say this and expect us to believe you?

Bernie will garner Independents and some Republicans where Hillary has much less cross-over appeal.

I asked but you had nothing that the Republicans can throw at Bernie as an example of what will crush him.

Come on, inquiring minds want to know?

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
25. Hillary Rather Than Having Crossover appeal Has Instead Crossover Antipathy!
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 01:11 PM
Jan 2016

THAT IS THE Problem with Hillary... It IS The History of... "Clinton Incorporated!

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
27. Someone else responded to you that Nate Silver has this on his polling tips.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 01:43 PM
Jan 2016

So no, you dont have to believe ME.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
7. This shows that 30 yrs of RW propaganda has had an effect.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:16 PM
Jan 2016

And the fact that Sanders hasn't been the target - and Clinton has, and yet has had consistent favorability - doesn't bode well for Sanders.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
12. Bullshit. 90% of those "scandals" were made up of whole cloth by the GOP.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 10:30 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:23 PM - Edit history (1)

And the other 10% weren't nearly as devastating or serious as the RW propaganda mill made them out to be.

But Bernie's supporters happily parade the bullshit out as of it's truthful, new, relevant - or even representative of progressive ideals. And they try to justify this reprehensible behavior by claiming "we mustn't elect a real Democrat like Hillary because the Republicans might say something mean about them! Vote for the fake Democrat instead!"

Berniestas crawl into the pigsty with the pigs, then pretend they're covered on rose pedals in an attempt to convince everyone else they smell sweet. But they're really just covering themselves in the same stinking muck as the RWers they claim to oppose.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
13. "I remember landing under sniper fire" in Tuzla, Bosnia and "there was supposed to be some kind of a
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 03:47 AM
Jan 2016

greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base."

Was that quote or the contrary film footage which unequivocally disproves that quote "made up of whole cloth by the GOP?" The Republicans had no hand in this -- she made this shit up herself.

I like Clinton and if she is our nominee I will forgive her errors, but let's not pretend that Clinton played no role in her well earned poor marks for dishonesty and untrustworthiness.

Shall we go one-by-one through the not-made-up-by-Republicans incidents of documented fabricated self-aggrandizement or can we please just agree that HRC has occasionally collaborated in the attacks on her honesty by making shit up from time to time?

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
15. That's a perfect example of all the meaningless "issues" people have with Clinton
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 08:13 AM
Jan 2016

Last edited Sun Jan 10, 2016, 09:18 AM - Edit history (1)

That have nothing really to do with the issues.

I'm not going to try to refute every RW lie that's been advertised by RW propaganda. Getting into the nitty-gritty trying to do that while they come up with some other bit of bullshit is exactly what the RW wants! The fact that supposed progressives on DU don't recognize it for what it is, and instead are helping the RW is astonishing to me. Every time.

You should have realized by now that the reason Bernie isn't a target of this RW lie machine isn't because of his inherent honesty and integrity - it's because he hasn't been a national figure for 30 yrs and isn't the front-runner for the nomination. If you want Bernie to win the nod & win the Presidency - just wait.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
14. Jury results
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 04:01 AM
Jan 2016

Mail Message
On Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:54 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

K&R
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=989546

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

Hillary Humpers? Let's keep DU free of childish name-calling. Hillary supporters are not Humpers and Bernie supporters aren't Humpers either.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Jan 10, 2016, 02:59 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I can't wait until the primary season is over.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The poster s referring to a website. Websites don't have feelings.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I'm all for the free exchange of ideas but I won't allow this to turn into a feces flinging match. Poster should be ashamed. Hide It.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I am a Bernie supporter. But this language is inappropriate.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: "Name calling" of a website is hurtful? Websites have developed emotions? Alerter, do better, really.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

 

vkkv

(3,384 posts)
23. Thank you Merrily. One poster over at the Hillary "group" actually said that she doesn't like
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 01:03 PM
Jan 2016

the way Bernie "wags his finger"... made no points about how Bernie faces the issues, they just don't like his fingering "wagging"...

You see, now THAT'S HOW you pick a candidate!

Ask Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
16. With Clinton, we risk losing the White House.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 08:17 AM
Jan 2016

With Sanders, we will win back the senate and maybe even the house. Easy choice, right?

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
21. Polls tell us he has cross-over appeal, and her coattails are negative.
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 12:29 PM
Jan 2016

So I guess that those who "feel" differently may want to acquaint themselves with who is strategically the better choice: Sanders.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Comparing these Sanders' ...