2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDid Howard Dean Explain Why he set up the 6 Debate Schedule ?
maybe he is biased against it since he didn't do well in debates when he was running and without them he thinks he would have won the nomination.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)It would make Sanders even stronger for when he faces the Republicans in November.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Sanders stronger, in fact debates has brought to the fore front Sanders weakness in the area of foreign affairs. He has had several opportunities to redeem himself in talk shows and again he leaves the foreign affairs subject and deflects to his financial statements.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)If Sanders had weakness in the area of foreign affairs then he would be the one that made a disastrous blunder in invading Iraq. But wait, that was Clinton (who according to you has superior knowledge in foreign affairs). And Libya. Oh wait, that was Clinton. Since when have Democrats considered the Monroe doctrine of foreign policy to be a weakness?
As to deflections to financial statements, the occurrences to which you refer he was asked a dual question about national security as well as his vision for the country. So he answered both in the same question. Not a deflection
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)I do listen to Sanders speak, I do not like his position on several issues.
Midnight Writer
(21,786 posts)Howard Dean had nothing to do with setting up the debates, the schedules or the participant qualifications.
Howard Dean is not the Chair of the Democratic National Committee and has not been since 2008.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the current Chair of the Democratic Committee and it is she and her staff who negotiated the debate schedule with the news networks.
djean111
(14,255 posts)DWS said the SHE created the debate schedule. And the debate rules clearly state that any debating each other outside of those six debates would be excluded from further DNC debates. Bernie did not take O'Malley's invitation to debate outside of the DNC schedule, and Bernie did publicly call for more DNC debates. The spin, eagerly lapped up and swallowed here by non-Bernie followers, is that Bernie just did not want for debates. Which is bullshit.
Looks like I will be voting for Bernie come hell or high water. What a duplicitous field. IMO and all that.
Tanuki
(14,920 posts)brooklynite
(94,698 posts)...he was referring to the 2008 Primary when there were six debates sponsored by the DNC; other debates were sponsored by other entities.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,402 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)think he is.
If you're going to hang your hopes on a single focus group (not "all" -- I only saw one that favored him at all, and I think it was run by everyone's favorite bewigged wingnut, Frank -cough/bullshit- Luntz) and those Reddit-run "Bernie Brigaded" online polls, you just go on ahead and do that.
Rest upon those laurels, now!
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)And we needn't even speak about Hillary's.
MADem
(135,425 posts)He is misrepresenting his conversation with Sanders?
That the staffers in the NYT article were lying?
What ARE you saying, precisely? Everyone fibs, even Sanders' staff--and the only one truth-telling is Bernie?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Are you sure you know the definition of truth?
MADem
(135,425 posts)It's not terribly difficult to read. Here, I'll give you the link yet again:
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/12/29/top-bernie-sanders-aide-rankles-those-in-and-out-of-campaign/
Uncle Joe
(58,402 posts)If the corporate media has held focus groups since, they've been hidden.
Bernie overwhelmingly won the Internet, when CNN used real time viewers of Facebook to grade the first debate and they realized that Bernie was kicking ass, they immediately denigrated the people on Facebook by referring to them as "kids" five times in under one minute and thirty nine seconds, before and while releasing the results, now that took some effort.
The vast majority of people on Facebook are over 25 years of age and probably older than Don Lemon.
Bernie has repeatedly called for more debates and that the schedule of them was rigged as well, Bernie has also stated that he won't participate in unsanctioned debates, that was the question that Dean put forth and O'Malley at best spoke a half truth with his answer.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Well if his 'staffed' said that it must be gospel!
MADem
(135,425 posts)It is gospel. They're quoted as saying so -- his "staffers" that is. Ooooh--and Martin O'Malley as well--unless we want to throw him on the "Big Old Liar" pile, too...?
Here--let me give you a LINK to PROVE what I said:
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/12/29/top-bernie-sanders-aide-rankles-those-in-and-out-of-campaign/?_r=0
As for the Sanders campaigns approach to the party committee, people briefed on the flap about the number of debates believe that Mr. Sanders has fed on outrage against the D.N.C. that was created by others, not his own team, in efforts to deal with the data issue. These people described Mr. Sanders team as decidedly less emphatic in private discussions about having more primary debates than they have been in public, realizing that debates are not his strength.
Mr. Briggs denied that claim. But in an interview on MSNBC on Tuesday morning, Martin OMalley, the low-polling Democrat who has pushed the hardest for more debates, seemed to confirm that Mr. Sanders had not been aggressively seeking to buck the party establishment.
I asked Senator Sanders to do more, said Mr. OMalley. Senator Sanders didnt want to do more debates either. He kind of liked where it is.
Sounds like Sanders' supporters are, once again, not doing their candidate any favors.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)I guess the people whining that he did are now out of a job, eh? They'll have to find something else to complain about!
Do go on and keep making it about "me" though--it proves a point I've made off and on for a long while.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)regardless.
MADem
(135,425 posts)The one on cancer was particularly elucidating. As was the one on child-rearing.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Do you really think you're changing hearts and minds with that kind of commentary? Holding the "high ground" with that sort of snark?
Live and Learn
25. You probably need to do some soul searching, if it is still possible. nt
If your goal is to bring people TO your candidate, you're doing a ghastly job of it, you know! Then again, in the context of the attitudes on display in that NYT article, you're just a happy member of the pack, it would appear...
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/12/29/top-bernie-sanders-aide-rankles-those-in-and-out-of-campaign/
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)He doesn't seem to realize that most adults are capable of reading it in context and understanding it was about gender stereotypes.
He hasn't convinced one person to stop supporting Bernie but that doesn't stop him from posting it over and over again
I don't know one intelligent person who read that essay and was scandalized by it. Some people should read more I guess.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)It's a story based on anonymous sources and entirely unreliable. I would say I am shocked to see it in the NY Times, but then I really am not anymore.
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)However, he may have won the nomination had he not been rat-fucked by a number of his Democratic opponents that year.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)As a former Deniac, I am greatly disappointed.
jfern
(5,204 posts)In 2008, there were 6 DNC sponsored debates, and 20 other debates.
GeorgeGist
(25,322 posts)Everything he says publicly, regarding Hillary, is to benefit Hillary.