2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNo longer on the fence
I have been on the fence and asking questions on this site this last week looking for answers that would help me decide whom I should support, the feed back has been very helpful most of the feedback has been thoughtful. A post today has helped me make up my mind
http://www.democraticunderground.com/128091263
The post had a link to this article
Link: http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/29/politics/bernie-sanders-on-a-plane/
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)I am looking forward to seeing Bernie bringing us together
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)We have cookies:
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Great idea for a house party!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The kid's got skills!
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)awake
(3,226 posts)Reading some of your responses to my questions help me know that not everyone on this site takes this election as seriously as I do.
Have fun and enjoy yourself
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)That's kind of a lot for someone on the fence.
awake
(3,226 posts)but was Locked out when I suggested that going after another candidates family would not be helpful to Hillary
I offen post to others posts based on what is listed on the "Latest Threads" or "Greatest Threads" with out taking note of what group the OP was started in.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)I don't look at which forum the post is in. I just respond to lastest and best posts. I got banned on the Hillary forum for daring to suggest presidential power is NOT for conservatives only.
When I dare asked one of the host of the Hillary forum why she banned me, she ridiculed me and laughed at me. She made a big old joke about me wanting to know why I was banned. First time in 14 years that I've ever been banned on DU.
Anyway Hillary supporters will ban you and ridicule you just because. So I'm never, ever going to vote for that woman or any of her minions, even if she gets the Democratic nomination. Before they banned me and ridiculed me, I might have.
Bullies are there own worse enimies.
ish of the hammer
(444 posts)the intertubes is pretty shallow - which i am sure was your point, fasttense.
thanks for pointing it out.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)I on the other hand have facts to prove a definitive attitude among Hillary supporters on the internet or on the television or in other public forums.
Bullies are their own worse enimies. They turn possible supporters into enimies.
I will never vote for Hillary because her supporters in any venue are well like her. Make assertions without regard to facts.
ish of the hammer
(444 posts)but you are correct - some of Clintons supporters are not nice.
Duval
(4,280 posts)fasttense
(17,301 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)"We won't vote for Sanders cuz his supporters!1!!"
thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)They tend to cross-post everything in GDP and the AA forum anyway, so
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)I will likely vote for him in our primary, but being locked out of a DU echo chamber is no great loss.
artislife
(9,497 posts)I haven't been banned by the h group.
But I have never posted in it.
And I stopped scanning it.
Actually, it is like that tree in the forrest that no ones hears.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)... cannot abide criticism about their precious.
By the way, you cannot be blocked from a group where you never post.
artislife
(9,497 posts)That is what the GDP is for. But some people like to make a mess in someone else's house. I think they should be shown the door.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)They don't have to even tell the person why. If that isn't cowardly, I don't know what is. I don't agree with Buzz Kill, er click er what ever, very often but banning is cowardly. If I could change the policy I would make it a requirement that you can't ban a person without a fair and impartial reason.
I got banned because I thought power was NOT a conservative thing. And then the Hillary group founder ridiculed me about asking why I got banned. I think yeah if you are going to be inappropriate you should get banned but if you merely want to talk about the perception that power is conservative that should NOT be the bases for your being banned.
Anyway, if you were a RepubliCON and wanted to make a mess of DU, you would start a forum and arbitrarily ban people. Since almost 80 percent of DU members are Bernie supporters, starting a Hillary group then arbitrarily banning people would be a good way to create chaos and piss everyone off. I suspect something like this is now going on.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Look at how they think it is a badge of honor.
Like this is the highest achievement to get. It just tells me how little they do in real life if they get off on being banned.
I think the GDP is where to hash out any debate. The only way I don't get upset by what is posted in any group I am not associated with is by not reading it. I used to read the AA group, because as a Latina I felt some kinship with them. My people's struggle in not the same or as hostile as theirs is, but they really help us all by being so pro active. I found, imo that it was filled with a huge anti Bernie sentiment, so I thought better of posting there with my avatar. I posted less than four times and it was very respectful of the group. I was a guest.
The Hillary group is out of bounds for me. Why would I even want to argue a point there? I believe in spaces for like minded people to gather and talk amongst themselves. If you want to read and learn what they think, go ahead. But it is like going into the Atheist group (I am an atheist) and arguing about our lack of faith in a Christian God. We get it, there are Christians out there. We want to hang out and talk without defending.
So if you behave badly according to the host, you get shown the door. It is their house.
merrily
(45,251 posts)The disconnect between the way some posters post and their statements about their voting plans is just amazing.
modestybl
(458 posts)... based on nothing but pointing out her record. They have a weak candidate and they know despite all the institutional and super PAC backing.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,176 posts)Didn't notice I was in the Hillary Group. Just posted what I thought was quite a moderate post on how we should all get along. Maybe it was my sig image.
They are quite a frightened little group of circled wagons in there.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)Don't take it too hard, they ban anyone that doesn't post fan mail as if it were discussion.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)It is not necessary to doubt someone's integrity based on a cursory glance at their posting history. Someone did that to me when I finally got off the fence and decided for Hillary, and I just find it so unnecessary to attack people and basically accuse them of lying. What is the purpose of that?
To the OP, when I got off the fence I went the other direction, but I'm glad for you that you made your choice. Go vote with a clear conscience and may we all unite next November behind the winning candidate so we can kick some Republican ass!
awake
(3,226 posts)After hearing HRC handle the Republicans 9 hours of throwing crap at her I knew she could handle the job if she gets it.
We have a long time before next November and I too hope that whom ever wins our primary we will all be able to get behind them.
Good Luck
Yallow
(1,926 posts)I am a Bernie Guy but I like Hillary, and Bill.
They made mistakes, but are real good people.
The Republican attacks that family has had to endure turns my stomach.
Someday I will make a top 10 list of reasons why I hate ALL Republicans.
Their flying monkey attacks on the Clintons is in the top 5.
ish of the hammer
(444 posts)never ask a question you don't already know the answer to.
so an entire committee full of lawyers and staff with assistant lawyers with months to prepare
9 hrs worth of questions and they ALL forgot the first thing taught in law school?
I don't know what's worse - to believe that it actually happened, or that it really actually did happen!
either way, it says a lot about the level of governance in this good ole usa.
TM99
(8,352 posts)There are lots of posts on policies, positions, speeches, and his history.
On the other side, there are memes, neoliberal talking points, and attacks on Sanders supporters.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)It is full of lies, scandals, being on the wrong side of social and historical issues, pandering, and neoconservative war mongering.
I guess when you have to decide whether to justify and support that or attack your opponents and their supporters, we know which has been chosen here at DU.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)Please be specific with sources cited. Thanks.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Just for the sake of it.
A real Democrat that can take all sides of an issue.
And hate every side.
A real low flyer.
TM99
(8,352 posts)I also know I will not get any answers either.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)I'll refresh your memory:
It is full of lies, scandals, the wrong side of social and historical issues, pandering, and neoconservative war mongering.
I guess when you have to decide whether to justify and support that or attack your opponents and their supporters, we know which has been chosen here at DU.
The "lies" to which I'm referring are the so-called "lies" in your post!
Not only are you deeply hypocritical and unintentionally ironic within your own posts, you cannot remember what you posted. Then, you have the bizarre audacity to dare me to justify your words.
I cannot decide whether to laugh or weep, recognizing that this is our base.
TM99
(8,352 posts)And instead of replying as requested, you bloviate instead.
1) Clinton has a history of lying from Chelsea at 9/11 to Bosnian sniper to the 'loss' of the Rose Law Firm documents.
2) Clinton has a history of scandals from Whitewater to her husband's affairs to having an email server in her personal residence.
3) Clinton was on the wrong side of history with regards to LGBT civil rights. She supported DADT & DOMA. She said marriage is a sacred bond between a man and a woman. This only changed in 2013, a mere two years ago.
4) Her social networking campaign this year is full of pandering from Rosa Parks logos to mi Abuela to fucking Kwanza logos.
5) She supports the neocon agendas from her cheerleading for Bush's Iraq War to the 'lets attack Iran' amendment support to her 'we came, we saw, he died' Libyan policies to her 'regime change' in Syria.
So I ask you again, which of these are lies. None of them. So weep for yourself. You are the 'base' that wants to elect this woman as our next president.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Most of which is a litany of points in favor of Sanders.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Why wouldn't he/she?
Yallow
(1,926 posts)Kinda sums it up.
Bernie is for sensible solutions to gun violence. Like full on background checks.
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-votes-for-background-checks-assault-weapons-ban
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)... this place is a great beacon of enlightenment for the curious and those seeking objective knowledge?
I generally like your posts, so no need to take this personally, but there is as much disinformation, wrong information, and emotion drenched bickering as any place on the Internet.
But to answer your question, I come here to pick up a few nuggets from people I trust and vent about rank crap I encounter on a regular basis.
brooklynite
(94,703 posts)You'll be here in November, right?
The future is too important not to show up and vote
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)What a curious question to ask a person expressing their decision for a primary vote.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)And visit it if you start to waver
Welcome aboard
stage left
(2,965 posts)you made a good choice.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)1. Sanders has served as an elected official for over 34 years. Clinton & most Republicans have not.
2. Sanders has supported gay rights since 40 years ago. Clinton and Republicans have not.
3. Sanders wants to end the prohibition of marijuana. Clinton & The Republicans do not.
4. Sanders wants to end the death penalty. Clinton and Th Republicans do not.
5. Sanders wants to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour. Clinton and the Republicans do not.
6. Sanders wants to break up the biggest banks. Clinton and The Republicans do not.
7. Sanders voted against the Wall Street bailout. Clinton and the Republicans (and too many "Democrats) did not.
8. Sanders introduced legislation to overturn Citizens United. Clinton and The Republicans did not.
9. Sanders refuses to accept money from super PACs. Clinton and the Republicans do not.
10. Sanders supports a single-payer healthcare system. Clinton and The Republicans do not.
11. Sanders refrains from waging personal attacks for political gains. Clinton and The Republicans do not.
12. Sanders considers climate change our nation's biggest threat. Clinton and The Republicans do not.
13. Sanders opposed the Keystone XL Pipeline since day one. Clinton and the Republicans do not.
14. Sanders voted against the Patriot Act. Clinton and the Republicans did not.
15. Sanders voted against the war in Iraq. Clinton and The Republicans did not.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=957245
Hillary sure seems to agree with Republicans a lot.
I don't,
that is why I am a Democrat, and voting for a Democrat....Bernie!
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)F Yeah!
Bernie is what I call a Real Democrat.
My kind of Democrat.
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)Says a lot that he'd go in the middle seat - my chump ass has a hard time sitting in the middle.
Paka
(2,760 posts)It matters not what the determining factor actually was. It matters most that the right decision was made.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)plane I fly on, my knees touch the seat in front of me. So I pay the small extra fee for the emergency exit row or bulkhead row. Failing that I have to sit in the aisle so I can lean because having your knees touch the seat of you for 3 hours is no good.
I'm 6'2", Bernie is apparently 6'0".
bvf
(6,604 posts)mountain grammy
(26,644 posts)Being sorry about voting to authorize an incompetent and reckless administration to invade a sovereign nation just doesn't cut it for me any more.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,210 posts)We even have our own DU donor page!
Chemisse
(30,816 posts)I am leaning Sanders at this point, but one post in your group and I am insta-banned. No questions, no discussion, no response to my pm.
It's not very welcoming.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)sonofspy777
(360 posts)also :awake:
and welcome to the revolution!
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)Vote for who you like in the primary. Everyone pulls together in the general. That's the rule. Anyone who doesn't follow it gets the ejector seat, not the middle seat Or they get the middle finger, not the middle seat.... something like that.....
awake
(3,226 posts)Not sure where the attitude is coming from your post seem a bit harsh. Maybe I am miss reading your post if so sorry.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Hillary says 'i'
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)Bernie will be the President of WE THE PEOPLE, the 99%.
Just knowing he respects us enough to spend our campaign donation money wisely/frugally and flies COACH, says everything. He's the real deal.
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)You're gonna LOVE feelin'thebern. Welcome!
K&R
awake
(3,226 posts)Takes me back to the summer of love, nice to be backing a candidate that attacks the problems not the other candidate.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)He doesn't care about optics or focus groups. He gets grumpy and doesn't care if people know he thinks they are being ridiculous. Sometimes he looks like he is wearing his fathers suit, but not before objecting that there is no real need to dress up. He is a lot like me and I trust me.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)please check out the sanders group if you haven't yet.
lots of issues and gotv strategies to discuss!
another informed citizen feelingthebern who hooooo
Duval
(4,280 posts)jalan48
(13,881 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Make sure to check out the BernieSanders.com site and check the events to find fun ways to help and meet some great people.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)but politically savvy.
I hope to all that is holy he will be our nominee.
Duckfan
(1,268 posts)Now would you like to see our desert menu?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Also if you are in the top 10%, but are not insatiably greedy.
gordyfl
(598 posts):large
awake
(3,226 posts)If Bernie got a 10th of the free press that MAin $tream Media gives Trump there would be no contest.