Independent investigation of the DNC incident.
Some here are attempting to construct some sort of conspiracy theory about Kroll being hired to investigate the data breach at the DNC. This theory attempts to look at other organizations that have hired Kroll.
Here's the thing: There are only a few firms who do this type of work on a national basis. No doubt, all of them have done investigations for organizations of which many do not approve. Forensic investigations are commonly performed, in a wide variety of circumstances.
Who a forensic investigation firm has worked with in the past is pretty much irrelevant. Any of the well-known firms have worked for any number of organizations to conduct such investigations. It's very unlikely that there are any firms capable of this investigation who have not worked on investigations for organizations some people do not like.
Since the Sanders campaign has approved of this assignment, along with the Clinton campaign, I assume, it sounds like the principals believe that Kroll can do this job in an independent way.
I can't see the point of constructing a conspiracy theory about it. It's a pretty straightforward sort of investigation.
= new reply since forum marked as read
Tyson Foods, Inc. to Acme Fox & Fence Co, Inc.: There's a chicken coop down yonder that's in need of security protection. How about you go on down there, check it out, we gave 'em your business card and a glowing referral. Hush now......remember we ARE the epitome of integrity..... you just remember that.
We rub you back, you rub ours. Haha. Shhhhh.
<wink-wink>
Let's wait and see how this plays out. They could be slimey as hell but still maintain an appearance impartiality and honesty (like DWS, DNC, NGP VAN and HRC). Right? 
Btw, I agree with you.
There is a breach of the DNC database making privileged data accessible.
The Sanders campaign is able to access privileged data of the Clinton campaign. And does.
But somehow it is the Sanders campaign that should pick the firm to audit the event? (Obviously that's not what happened; it's what you seem to be arguing should happen.)
Imagine if the events had occurred the other way around. Hillary and her campaign would be virtually tarred and feathered by some here on DU. Some have been doing that all along and will likely continue doing so.
But hey, please go with your proposal. If Sanders wants to spend his campaign's money for a second audit, why not?
It makes as much sense as anything else about this situation - which really doesn't amount to much in the grand scheme of things anyway.
