2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHere is a link the should bring some discussion
election results Hillary as candidate versus Bernie as candidate.
http://rightwingstories.blogspot.com/2015/12/the-general-election-electoral-vote-map.html
tecelote
(5,122 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)Dukakis got 40% of the white vote, 89% of the African American vote, and 70% of the Hispanic vote:
http://ropercenter.cornell.edu/polls/us-elections/how-groups-voted/how-groups-voted-1988/
If Hillary gets that she wins in a laugher.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)... All my friends LOVE Bernie so all polling and evidence to the contrary of my post are just wrong!1!1
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,714 posts)Inferential statistics might lie bur descriptive statistics never do.
wyldwolf
(43,870 posts)However, you know as well as I do facts to the contrary of narratives like the OP's link are too often discounted.
I've just quit trying to reason with historical facts and current polling data. But I am looking forward to all the conspiracy theories after Clinton wins.
longship
(40,416 posts)When one considers such a messy thing like polling, elections, etc. there is little rhyme or reason to it. The polling organizations try to get it right, but previous polling vs. election results have zero correlation to current polling vs. election results. Each stands on its own.
That's why I don't worry too much about these things. At best one can look at them as a guideline. How did my candidate change in the polls? Instead of, how are my candidate's numbers doing in the absolute sense? Plus, one has to factor in the Internet, which I am not sure the pollsters have right even now. We'll see about that.
My advice. Keep working for your candidate. That will do the most good. Pretend that the polls don't exist. That's what I am doing, and I am going to vote for Bernie.
Keep fighting the fight. We're going to beat the GOP in November no matter who wins the nomination.
Happy happy to you!
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)within the last 4 weeks or so (limited by what polls are available)
Respectfully, I think their presentation is over the top. The gap isn't nearly that large. But I am comfortable in saying when I assessed it that Bernie did better against the GOP on a state by state basis than Hillary did and the difference was Rubio (who looked to be their best) would beat Hillary somewhat comfortably but lose to Bernie in a fairly tight contest.
4 week later. That could have changed. But not to the extreme they're displaying.
And the (oversimplifying?) reason seems to be that he does better with Independents and Republicans than she does.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Hillary will do a bit better than they're showing if she is the nominee, but it would be an uphill battle. Bernie would have a much easier time. No one is excited about Hillary, and if she gets the nomination, a large portion of very active voters will tune out(I know I'll lose interest), and a large portion of hateful republicans would tune in. Bernie counteracts both of those.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)And I think that is right.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)We lose the Youth vote and the House and Senate for the next 10 years
msongs
(67,453 posts)then one cannot actually say everyone knows when some don't. and the OP is quoting an anonymous source lol
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Of course DWS and Hillary aren't talking about it but already there have been several pundits and well respected columnist discussing it
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Bottom line, if Clinton wins the primary then the establishment wins period, regardless of which party prevails in the GE; and once again the people lose. It's as simple as that.
earthside
(6,960 posts)Let's face it, all Hillary Clinton has going for her is that she is a woman (and that is problematic since she has only been a credible candidate for the nomination because her husband has already been president).
Her position on issues is center-right, she is a pedestrian speech-maker, she is boring, she has a train load of political baggage.
Sen. Sanders is a crusader for working, poor and middle Americans -- he is taking the progressive agenda foursquare to the nation.
I'm in Colorado ... no doubt Hillary Clinton would lose here. Sanders, however, changes the dynamic and he could win.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)What does that make Bernie?
frylock
(34,825 posts)Who cares that they both voted to rename a post office?
Alittleliberal
(528 posts)On the issues Bernie is the only adult in the room.
santafe52
(57 posts)This might be the dumbest thing I've ever seen on DU.
Karl Rove
.is that you?
DocMac
(1,628 posts)for 4 1/2 years. And, while you have been a member for a long time, I am wondering what is stopping me from alerting your post. Are you not saying that a member here is in fact one of the craziest Republicans known to man?
FailureToCommunicate
(14,025 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)And the rightwing hasn't even run a single ad against him. He will get creamed.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)Because the DNC/DWS is making sure we get the least electable democratic candidate in the general.