2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWas any of the info Sanders staff got marked "Top Secret?"
Im sick of the DNC being Clintons water carrier.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)It was private. It was stolen. End of story!
mgcgulfcoast
(1,127 posts)Even moreso than Rubio and Bush
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)not to touch another person's property without permission. Period. Did Sanders supporters not learn this lesson as toddlers? It appears that rules are for everyone else but them.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Belonged to every campaign. The results contained additional data not requested due to the "glitch"
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)...then just coincidentally made exclusion and target lists which they coincidentally chose as their coincidental method to coincidentally prove their coincidental good behavior.
randome
(34,845 posts)That damned Debbie!
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You have to play the game to find out why you're playing the game. -Existenz[/center][/font][hr]
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Stop trying to justify theft.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)The key word is common to all democratic campaigns. They do a search and get the results from the system. This time due to the bug, the Clinton's additional data also was coming back on those searches.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)They saw that they could access Clinton's voter files by doing the query, yes. But then they used the system to pull specific voter file lists. That data was not theirs.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)That seems to be the threshold that one campaign sets. I just hope an actual independent investigation gets to the bottom of this.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The reaction to the theft of Clintons info has been mind blowing.