Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MSNBC: Two more Sanders staffers suspended... (Original Post) brooklynite Dec 2015 OP
Good Kalidurga Dec 2015 #1
Accusing others of wrong doing with no evidence... JaneyVee Dec 2015 #4
The evidence was in the lawsuit Bernie filed Kalidurga Dec 2015 #7
Can you explain the incident? What happened? LuvLoogie Dec 2015 #19
You figure it out Kalidurga Dec 2015 #22
This is all it says: LuvLoogie Dec 2015 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Kalidurga Dec 2015 #26
This article explains it pretty well Renew Deal Dec 2015 #28
Thanks, but I was inquiring as to what evidence of Clinton malfeasance LuvLoogie Dec 2015 #29
I haven't seen evidence that data was actually read. Where was that? pnwmom Dec 2015 #31
Drip...drip....drip... JaneyVee Dec 2015 #2
I'm not jumpong to any conclusions. Bernie said they were investigating, and napi21 Dec 2015 #3
The DNC told the media what was going on before they told the Bernie campaign jfern Dec 2015 #5
Very clever to announce this on a Saturday night, right after a big debate. BlueCheese Dec 2015 #6
It also kind of had to happen after Sanders said anybody else involved would be fired mythology Dec 2015 #10
I'm sure they'll be fired if they did anything wrong jfern Dec 2015 #14
I very much believe Sanders did not know about these staffers' actions beforehand... BlueCheese Dec 2015 #16
Suspended pending investigation means they're about to be fired. RandySF Dec 2015 #8
This is turning into a good way to see how each candidate deals with a problem. Motown_Johnny Dec 2015 #9
+1000 -- Exactly!! Douglas Carpenter Dec 2015 #30
Obviously, Clinton is to blame! alcibiades_mystery Dec 2015 #11
One does not simply blame Obama.. Cha Dec 2015 #32
LOL Cha livetohike Dec 2015 #34
Hey livetohike! Cha Dec 2015 #35
No way! Early in the morning here on the East livetohike Dec 2015 #36
Yeah, it sucks to have your fate in the hands of those who can't actually Cha Dec 2015 #37
I thought there was no harm done. nt LexVegas Dec 2015 #12
There was no harm done, but that won't save them from being fired jfern Dec 2015 #15
That's the story they're trying to push but it's not working. Cha Dec 2015 #33
Anyone involved in taking the data should be. Dawson Leery Dec 2015 #13
Donna Brazille said before the debate that there R B Garr Dec 2015 #17
The vendor says that's not true. madfloridian Dec 2015 #18
Nice cherry picking. R B Garr Dec 2015 #20
The words of the vendor are cherry-picking. madfloridian Dec 2015 #21
Oh, I've heard it all, too. R B Garr Dec 2015 #23
Good, I expect the lawsuit to be dropped soon, as well. joshcryer Dec 2015 #24
From your fingers to God's ears. Number23 Dec 2015 #27
There needs to a full and complete accounting here Gothmog Dec 2015 #38

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
1. Good
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 01:47 AM
Dec 2015

He is handling it the way it should be handled. Do you wonder what happened to Hillary's people that read data that was sent to her campaign?

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
7. The evidence was in the lawsuit Bernie filed
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 01:49 AM
Dec 2015

go find it yourself since you like to accuse people so much.

LuvLoogie

(7,003 posts)
19. Can you explain the incident? What happened?
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 02:00 AM
Dec 2015

Who was involved? There was an alusion to a previous incident, but there was no evidence or statement of fact, just a "Clinton did it in 2008" equivocation in the complaint.

So Please tell me what you are talking about?

LuvLoogie

(7,003 posts)
25. This is all it says:
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 02:16 AM
Dec 2015

23) Upon information and belief, a similar security incident arose with the NGP VAN
software during the 2008 national presidential primaries, resulting in the unintentional
transmission of Confidential Information to the campaign of Democratic primary candidate
Hillary Clinton (the “Prior Incident”).

Case 1:15-cv-02211 Document 1 Filed 12/18/15 Page 5 of 11
NY_DOCS:607859.1 6

So either you have more details you know about, or the words in the complaint mean something to you beyond what they say.

Response to LuvLoogie (Reply #25)

LuvLoogie

(7,003 posts)
29. Thanks, but I was inquiring as to what evidence of Clinton malfeasance
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 02:49 AM
Dec 2015

Kalidurga was referring. He linked to the complaint filed this this week, but there is no evidence or accounting of facts against Clinton stated, only an allusion to a 2008 incident. I have to ask Kalidurga how that is relevant to what Bernie's staffers did, or how that exonerates him.

But Kalidurga deleted his/her last response to me.

napi21

(45,806 posts)
3. I'm not jumpong to any conclusions. Bernie said they were investigating, and
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 01:47 AM
Dec 2015

if other staffers were guilty in this data mess, they'd be gone. Where's the news here?

BlueCheese

(2,522 posts)
6. Very clever to announce this on a Saturday night, right after a big debate.
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 01:49 AM
Dec 2015

I'm being serious, not snarky about that. It shows political acumen.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
10. It also kind of had to happen after Sanders said anybody else involved would be fired
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 01:52 AM
Dec 2015

Although they weren't actually fired, but it was known that multiple people had been involved. Only firing one created an ethical issue for the Sanders campaign.

If all of the people involved had been suspended/fired immediately and the Sanders campaign said "yeah we screwed up and here's how we're fixing it" this would have been a non issue.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
14. I'm sure they'll be fired if they did anything wrong
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 01:55 AM
Dec 2015

They are suspended while the campaign figures that out. The DNC told the media what was going on before they told the Bernie campaign, so the DNC didn't exactly make it easy for the Bernie campaign.

BlueCheese

(2,522 posts)
16. I very much believe Sanders did not know about these staffers' actions beforehand...
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 01:56 AM
Dec 2015

... and is genuinely personally disappointed at their behavior.

He simply does not strike me as the type of person to do these kinds of things.

RandySF

(58,835 posts)
8. Suspended pending investigation means they're about to be fired.
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 01:51 AM
Dec 2015

Usually the suspension is about getting said employee out of a position to do damage. It also tells me that Bernie may be taking control of his campaign.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
9. This is turning into a good way to see how each candidate deals with a problem.
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 01:52 AM
Dec 2015

It isn't as if problems won't appear. They will and seeing how they are dealt with is important.

Hillary spent 5 months insisting that she would not turn over her server, until she did.

Bernie has fired one staffer, suspended 2 more, forced the DNC to back down on their withholding of voter information and is moving toward exposing exactly what happened. All within a few days.


Yes, this should not have happened. Guess what, stuff happens. Bernie deals with it. Hillary avoids it.

The contrast is even clearer than it had been before this happened.

Cha

(297,240 posts)
37. Yeah, it sucks to have your fate in the hands of those who can't actually
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 08:11 AM
Dec 2015

tell what's going on around them.

R B Garr

(16,954 posts)
17. Donna Brazille said before the debate that there
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 01:56 AM
Dec 2015

may have been files deleted. That's pretty serious. So far we've seen age demographic searches, files downloaded and now possible sabotage of Clinton's files.

All that had to have been planned or thought out. That's why it's funny to see his supporters talking about "discovery". LOL. As far as I know, illegal activity is a bar to a breach of contract claim. The "lawsuit' was all more of his bluster anyway. Just more of his phoniness.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
18. The vendor says that's not true.
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 02:00 AM
Dec 2015
http://blog.ngpvan.com/news/data-security-and-privacy

On Wednesday morning, there was a release of VAN code. Unfortunately, it contained a bug. For a brief window, the voter data that is always searchable across campaigns in VoteBuilder included client scores it should not have, on a specific part of the VAN system. So for voters that a user already had access to, that user was able to search by and view (but not export or save or act on) some attributes that came from another campaign.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»MSNBC: Two more Sanders s...