2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDebbie, Nathaniel, and Hillary...The Unholy Trinity
If it walks like a duck,....
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)If Bernie kept him you'd be questioning that also.
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)There is no crime, no one was fired, and only Hillary should be blamed.
The Boss
(63 posts)Try again.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)On Sat Dec 19, 2015, 11:27 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Where does the criminal Bernie fired fit in?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=920857
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Alleging that Bernie is a criminal is way over the top.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Dec 19, 2015, 11:38 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: You are reading that wrong.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Post is a little harsh but not that big a deal. Sorry, free speech and all that. Bluejazz
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Alerter made a mistake in reading comprehension. It's not "criminal Bernie", it's the "criminal" that "Bernie fired".
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Yes, it would be over the top if the post was alleging Bernie is a criminal. But it does not. "Where does "the criminal" (that) Bernie fired fit in? Please don't be so quick to alert next time, because you are doing a disservice to DU when you failed to comprehend the sentence posted.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Although this alleges that the staffer who was fired is a "criminal," this is an OTT slam on the Sanders campaign.
(Don't bother to reply -- you're on my IL.)
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Hepburn
(21,054 posts)MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)Spot on!
LiberalArkie
(15,719 posts)On Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:26 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
I have started looking at Jill Stein as a possible "Plan B" for the first time
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=920888
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Openly advocating for a candidate from another party is against the TOS.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:29 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Shit stirring. HIDE.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Look, y'all already got Manny banned for not falling into groupthink...please stop with these frivolous alerts. It's already SupportHillaryClinton Underground as it is.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I just don't see how hiding this post accomplishes anything. I hope things cool down quickly because all this is hurting all Democrats. I just don't like hiding posts.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: After the primaries are over, yes, before, no. There is also a difference in "looking at" and "will".
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Fuck Jill Stein. And Rand Paul and any other libertarian green third party spoiler.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Geez, the primaries have not even happened yet.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)B" that might include Jill Stein.
From what I'm reading about Stein, I'm very impressed with her (not as impressed with Sanders or O'Malley, but quite impressed).
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)Both worked for Hillary. No "conspiracy" there.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)moobu2
(4,822 posts)those evil bastids!!
artislife
(9,497 posts)in_cog_ni_to
(41,600 posts)That's not even a question now. DWS came out in full support of HRH YESTERDAY and THAT is completely unethical since the DNC is there to support ALL the candidates without favoritism. She has failed miserably and needs to be FIRED, IMMEDIATELY.
PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)10-yard penalty, repeat first down!
Come on! A Facebook post as proof of collusion? The oligarchy or the people! Only two choices? OMG, really? Anyone who likes Clinton is automatically in the oligarch column? John Lewis the oligarch, enemy of the people!