2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHas Debbie Wasserman Schultz been committing election fraud?
..on behalf of the Clinton campaign? If it isn't election fraud, what is it?
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Culminating in her àttempting to drop a wrecking ball on it yesterday, and getting caught. If it isn't election fraud, what his it? Just rigging? Just old fashioned political corruption?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)O'Malley may be able to be jilted some but she'd say polls are minimum.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Or is it just plain old every day fraud?
Sign the petition! https://www.change.org/p/debbie-wasserman-schultz-a-call-for-corruption-dripping-debbie-wasserman-schultz-head-of-dnc-to-resign?recruiter=451102910
Enrique
(27,461 posts)election fraud is a crime
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Interesting...
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)And probably end with partisan.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)You guys apparently have no clue what is happening, and where it is headed. She cannot get the genie back into the bottle.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)You don't seem to have a clue either.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Schultz is under heavy pressure to resign. It's only a matter of time now. The cat is out of the bag and Bernie will now get wide exposure! DWS little stunt has had the opposite effect she desired. The end result of her actions was easily predictible, which calls her competence into question.
The genie is out of the bottle.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)But what Brrnie did has nothing to do with her.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)That's why she is the one facing pressure to resign, not Sanders!
Sign the petition! https://www.change.org/p/debbie-wasserman-schultz-a-call-for-corruption-dripping-debbie-wasserman-schultz-head-of-dnc-to-resign?recruiter=451102910
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)It's a biased poll with no basis in fact.
edgineered
(2,101 posts)Maybe put the change.org poll in its own thread?
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)RandySF
(58,936 posts)What you do with voter data has nothing to do with the conduct of an election. Please brush up.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)supporters and former campaign workers that holds the data for the entire Democratic Party...and can turn it off or on in a heartbeat?
And you're right...it does fall under a broader context. And one the Clintons have been famous for...stacking the deck in their favor and getting away with it...before our very eyes, right now it's out there in the public realm...names, positions and former alliances... because Bernie's folk reported it...twice.
Thus the first head that should roll is the IT company. If the rank and file had known this in the beginning, there would have been demands to find a neutral company
Maybe brush up on conflict of interest.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Seems the fix is in, borrowed this from another thread. Thanks SoapBox
artislife
(9,497 posts)and not one likable character.
Lars39
(26,109 posts)Barf
99Forever
(14,524 posts)But then I'm just one of those little people, put on this Earth to provide services for the 01% and their like.
What the fuck do I know?
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Judging by how fast the DNC caved and reinstated access, I'd say DWS doesn't want that lawsuit to move forward.
starroute
(12,977 posts)It's probably not a crime unless there was some other illegality involved, such as a quid pro quo. But it does seem to be outrageous favoritism.
In googling around, I found this incident from last summer. And yes, the story is from the Washington Times -- please don't hate me -- because they were the only ones to make an issue of it and go into detail. But the same basic facts are there in any report on the convention.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/aug/28/dnc-lets-clinton-break-rules-speech-summer-meeting/
The Democratic National Committee demonstrated Friday that when it comes to Hillary Rodham Clinton, the rules do not apply.
Mrs. Clinton, the front-runner for the partys presidential nomination, was allowed to break the time limit on her speech Friday to the DNCs summer convention in Minneapolis. Her speech lasted about 24 minutes, despite an announcement beforehand by DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz that speeches by presidential candidate at the meeting would be limited to seven minutes.
Afterward, Mrs. Wasserman Schultz told the crowd of party faithful that she had erred in her original announcement and that the time limit was actually 15 minutes, though Mrs. Clinton exceed that restriction by about nine minutes.
The apparent preferential treatment received by Mrs. Clinton was noted by state Democratic Party leaders at the convention.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)DWS has been pulling out all the stops to squelch Bernie and shove Hillary down our throats in the primaries.
And that's a huge breach of ethics and trust. The DNC chair is supposed to be impartial in primary races, and DWS has been everything but impartial.
DWS needs to be removed immediately.
starroute
(12,977 posts)And that was just over her refusal to back the Iran deal -- not anything to do with the campaign. (http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a37542/dnc-chairperson/) But there have been persistent questions about her leadership, and Wikipedia suggests behind-the-scenes manipulation when Obama was considering dropping her in 2013.
What also caught my eye in Pierce's piece was his offhand statement that "this is not to mention the long history that DWS has with the Fanjul family, the premier sugar dynasty in Florida."
The only thing I know about the Fanjul family is the claim in an old website on Bush contributors that "The Fanjul family has such extraordinary political access that President Clinton took a call from Alfonso Fanjul while being serviced by Monica Lewinsky." (http://info.tpj.org/pioneers/wayne_berman.html)
However, I do find a lot about Schultz and the Fanjuls at Howie Kelin's Down with Tyranny blog. Klein has been going after this current flap really hard (https://twitter.com/downwithtyrannyr), but he's had Schultz in his sights for a long time. Here are a couple of posts, from 2012 and 2014, that refer both to Schultz's general support for the anti-Castro Cubans and to her specific efforts to defeat a bill that would have roll back sugar price supports that make the Fanjuls millions.
http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2012/03/how-badly-are-steve-israel-and-debbie.html
I've been told by a very good source that the Fanjul brothers-- the big bucks behind the American sugar industry and major financial players for corrupt conservative politicians on both sides of the aisle-- count on Wasserman Schultz to guarantee the political viability of their Cuban right-wing Republican protégés in increasingly Democratic South Florida. As chairman of the DCCC's red-to-blue program, Wasserman Schultz did exactly that for her pals, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Mario and Lincoln Diaz-Balart in 2008, willfully wrecking the campaigns of their 3 Democratic opponents. That earned her a nice promotion to the head of the DNC, where she's doing an even worse job... for Democrats. Wasserman Schultz enforces a hard-line anti-Cuban position for the Fanjuls and makes sure that Cuban sugar can't be imported and they can keep the price of domestic sugar artificially high. They help her build her political power inside the Democratic Party in return.
http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2014/08/is-there-democrat-in-congress-more.html
This morning I got my daily "give me your money" e-mail from one of America's most corrupt politicians, Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL). The subject line was "Petition: Clean Up Campaign Finance" and instead of deleting it unopened like I do with 90% of her spam, I opened it to examine the latest hypocrisy from the sleazy New Dem trying to accumulate as much money as she can in a push to bribe fellow Democratic House members to make her party leader when Pelosi retires or when Pelosi and Hoyer retire. . . .
Schultz was the head of the DCCC's Red to Blue program in 2008, she endorsed 3 corrupt Republican amigos-- Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Mario Diaz-Balart-- over three Democrats. Chris Van Hollen fired her a Red to Blue chair, but not before her toxicity had taken root. That year Wasserman Schultz helped beat Joe Garcia, who eventually made it to Congress anyway and helped beat Annette Taddeo, who is running for Lt. Governor today. Neither likes talking about Wasserman Schultz's corruption but both have told intimates she's lower than a snake. In Florida Democratic politics if you don't make an effort to get along with her, you can find yourself face down in a swamp, metaphorically speaking. That was when other Members of Congress first started telling me that Wasserman Schultz was a funnel for far right Cuban money to Democratic members of the House and for sugar cane money (which is behind anything that will keep the U.S. from normal relations with Cuba). . . .
Wasserman Schultz directed payments from a Big Sugar-funded right-wing front group, the US-Cuba Democracy PAC to hand over $320,000 to Democrats of her choice that cycle. Fifty-two of the 66 Democrats who voted against Rangels amendment received one or more contributions from the U.S.-Cuba Democracy PAC that year. Wasserman Schultz's own leadership PAC gave nearly a quarter million dollars to Democrats running for re-election and election in the House that year. Between the US-Cuba Democracy PAC and her own sleazy Democrats Win Seats PAC this is how much loot Wasserman Schultz was able to direct to Democratic freshmen willing to sell her their votes, even from congressmen representing agricultural districts where this amendment would have had widespread support.
starroute
(12,977 posts)A few weeks ago, AP reported on Hillary's meetings with supporters while she was Secretary of State. I don't normally trust AP because of their tendency to spin, but the facts and numbers here seem pretty straightforward.
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6b96865adeec4ecc8e9c05f87ec554ba/calendars-show-clintons-availability-supporters
Another was Alfonso Fanjul, one of four brothers who run a Florida-based sugar and real estate conglomerate and are politically active in the state's Cuban-American community.
Fanjul, whose family subsidiaries include Domino Sugar and Florida Crystals, was a Florida co-chairman for Bill Clinton's first presidential campaign in 1992, supported Hillary Clinton's 2008 run and has donated between $100,000 and $250,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Florida Crystals spent $1 million lobbying the Obama administration in 2011 and nearly that amount in 2009, 2010 and 2012 on issues related to sugar and its use as a biofuel.
Fanjul met Hillary Clinton for a half hour in October 2009. Gaston Cantens, a spokesman for the firm, said Fanjul sought the 2009 meeting because he was having "customs issues coming in and out of the country and wanted help." Cantens said Fanjul's entry and exit problems eased.
Clinton met Fanjul again at a 10-minute "pull-aside" during a Brookings Institution luncheon in June 2012. The event honored Saban and his wife, Cheryl, who both bundled donations to Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign and whose family foundation has donated between $5 million and $10 million to the Clinton Foundation.
starroute
(12,977 posts)The four Fanjul brothers have an outsize presence in both the Dominican Republic and the United States. In the DR, their American company, Central Romana, produces most of the countrys sugar. In the U.S., the Fanjuls also grow cane and spend heavily in Washington, ranking among the sugar industrys top political donors and biggest spenders on lobbying. As big players in both countries, they benefit from a highly profitable combination of factors: In the DR, Central Romana pays some of the lowest wages in the country, produces most of the countrys allotment of sugar exported to the U.S. and, thanks to CAFTA-DR, pays dwindling tariffs for those exports. Meanwhile, in the U.S., the Fanjuls sell their sugar at sometimes two to three times the global market price, thanks to import limits and price supports. . . .
Ahead of the 2008 presidential elections, Andres directly contributed almost three times as much as Alfy did to Hillary Clintons campaign, but Alfonsos relationship with the Clintons is more well-known. The Alfonso Fanjul-Bill Clinton friendship dates to Clintons first run for president in 1992, when Fanjul co-chaired his campaign in Florida. And after Fanjul visited Cuba in 2012 and 2013, he reportedly told then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that his views once staunchly pro-embargo were changing. Alfy and Andres also signed letters to President Barack Obama over the past year, urging increased engagement with Cuba. . . .
In January, Bill and Hillary Clinton visited their old friend and campaign donor Alfy at Casa de Campo, the Fanjuls 7,000-acre residential resort in the DR, where the Fanjuls have a second home. The resorts website says that over dinner they chatted about Hillarys possible presidential run.
starroute
(12,977 posts)My apologies for posting so much -- but I think this could turn out to be important.
http://dominicanwatchdog.org/page-Fanjuls_cash_in_while_U.S._taxpayers_foot_$1.8_billion_bill_for_destruction_of_the_Everglades
Despite being behind every packet of Domino sugar in every diner in the country, the name Fanjul is little-known outside of Florida. Alfy and Pepe Fanjul run Flo-Sun, Inc., the mega-corporation that, alongside U.S. Sugar, dominates the American sugar industry and wields substantial political influence in Washington and around the country. Flo-Suns subsidiaries include Domino, Florida Crystals, C&H and Redpath Sugar, but the companys legacy is its alleged stranglehold on sugar-industry policy in the United States. The Fanjuls sugar empire benefits from environmental efforts that give them a green image as taxpayers foot the bill and from federal subsidies that American consumers pay for both at the grocery store and on tax day.
Floridas Everglades Forever Act of 1994 drives one of the major environmental cleanup efforts in the state. Everglades Forever implementation so far has cost the state of Florida $1.8 billion. Of that, Florida sugar companies have pledged to contribute $300 million in tax revenue. (The Fanjuls own 40 percent of Floridas sugar industry, though no hard numbers exist on how much each company has offered to the effort.) Put another way, the industry that is almost entirely responsible for both the historical destruction of the Everglades and continual pollution of the ecosystem thanks to fertilizer runoff is footing less than 20 percent of the bill to clean up the mess. . . .
The Fanjul familys political connections and, it could be said, the Florida sugar industrys diminished role in paying for the Everglades reconstruction projects that were crafted in the 90s become rather more open when it comes to Alfy Fanjuls longstanding ties to the Clinton family. The campaign donation records of Alfy Fanjul, a Democrat, show he gave extensively to both the Senate and presidential campaigns of Hillary Clinton. He has also given money to the William J. Clinton Foundation, was the co-chair of Bill Clintons 1992 Florida campaign and has hosted Clinton fundraisers in the past.
Alfy Fanjuls Clinton association received outsized attention during the Kenneth Starr investigation of Clinton; Bill Clintons breakup speech with Monica Lewinsky was cut short by a phone call from Alfy Fanjul. While White House records dont document the content of phone calls, Alfys call, made on Presidents Day in 1996, could very well have been in reference to an announcement that Vice President Gore had made just hours before that hed be pursuing a tax of a penny per pound on sugar producers. Fanjul could not have been happy about this as evidenced by the millions spent by the sugar industry (PDF) in pre-election day advertising once the tax was put on the ballot in Florida. Ultimately, Big Sugar ads claiming the tax would be a job killer won out and Florida voters killed the measure. Bill Clinton quietly shelved it on the federal level against Gores wishes.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)the obvious answer is no.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)What are they then?
I think you are confusing voting fraud with election fraud. Rigging an election is fraud.