2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDWS on msnbc saying she personally called Sanders yesterday and informed him
of the data breach --and said his campaign had not informed him (this would have been on Thursday). But the breach had occurred on Wednesday. She went onto say that Sanders is a good man-a man of integrity who has run a good campaign but his staff has not served him well. I am glad she said this (on msnbc just now).
This is the type of data that the Sanders camp assessed....
....
.....What was accessed
Two senior Democrats familiar with the program and the investigation told CNN that the Sanders campaign accessed turnout projections for Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, a key piece of strategy the Clinton campaign has been working on with modeling and analytics.
The Sanders team, which consisted of four people, ran multiple searches in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Carolina and about 10 March states, including Florida and Colorado. In Iowa and New Hampshire, the Clinton campaign has ranked voters on a scale of 1-100 for turnout, enthusiasm and support, the senior Democrats said. The Sanders campaign ran two searches: "Show me all the Clinton people rated higher than 60" and "Show me all the people rated less than 30." This would be a key way of knowing who Sanders should target in the final weeks before voting: Ignore those above 60, while focus on those below 30, because they are looking for a Clinton alternative and might be open to Sanders.
The investigation into what information was lifted should only take a few days as there are audit logs and trails of the activity, which took place beginning around 10:40 a.m. and lasting for about 40 minutes, the senior Democrats said.
They added that the Clinton campaign views this as a big deal but will not say so publicly because it will fan the flames of liberal groups trying to fight with the DNC.
In a statement released Friday afternoon, the Clinton campaign called for the Sanders campaign and the DNC to "work expeditiously to ensure that our data is not in the Sanders campaign's account and that the Sanders campaign only have access to their own data."................
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/18/politics/bernie-sanders-campaign-dnc-suspension/index.html
daleanime
(17,796 posts)see ya there.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Wassermann-Schultz just lied.
He said he provide info yesterday and asked if they needed more to let him know. Showed his smart phone with the e-mail to prove it and offered up to msm if they want to verify.
earthside
(6,960 posts)Wassermann Schultz should be fired or should resign.
Her peevish lecturing on MSNBC is exactly what the Democrats don't need; her bias is so obvious that it is an embarrassment to the DNC.
riversedge
(70,247 posts)on TV--full charge ahead-not giving anyone else a chance to talk. Very rude.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)So I don't know what you watched. Debbie should really cut down on her smoking, that cough really has me concerned.
riversedge
(70,247 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)And crying victim...
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)riversedge
(70,247 posts)another one in Oct that was taken care of internally. Seems the breach in Oct was noted but no one accessed the other camps date at the time. It is an asterisk compared to this one.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)She knows what she has to do, and if she doesn't do it she can answer for it in court.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)I thought it was months ago.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)Samantha
(9,314 posts)"Upon information and belief..." now isn't that interesting? I wonder why DWS did not mention that to him?
The agreement says the DNC must give The Campaign ten days' notice if they were going to make the database unavailable. No notice was issued.
Sam
riversedge
(70,247 posts)Samantha
(9,314 posts)Now it is officially in the pleading. It appears there is evidence.
Sam
mythology
(9,527 posts)I would assume that if there is an intentional breach (and running multiple queries for relevant data qualifies), then there is a clause that allows for a more immediate shut down of access.
riversedge
(70,247 posts)Samantha
(9,314 posts)I read it and I believe Sanders will get his access back.
Sanders asserts his own data was breached as well. That is in the pleading, but I am not sure if he is referring to the firewall failure 3 months ago, or something more recent. Just a simple short assertion.
Sam
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I'd like to hear what DU attorneys like berry hill (Sanders supporter) and misanthrope (clinton supporter) have to say about that.