Let me just remind all the crows, the FBI has an active criminal investigation

[morningfog]

into one candidate's computer practices. And it is not Bernie Sanders.

[JaneyVee]

1. Sorry, but its not a criminal investigation.

[Purveyor]

7. Care to share with us what it is then? Last I knew the FBI didn't

investigate 'civil' matters.

[morningfog]

8. You must not understand who the FBI is. Lol.

[Thinkingabout]

2. This will probably change soon.

[morningfog]

9. How so? Think about it.

[Thinkingabout]

10. it just might turn into a criminal investigation, morningfog.

[workinclasszero]

16. Yup cover ups have a nasty

tendency to blow up in politicians faces.

[morningfog]

17. Where's the crime? At least you concede Hillary's liability.

[Thinkingabout]

22. Hillary is not responsible for the deeds of Sanders staff and furthermore Sanders is not

Responsible for the deeds unless he ordered this to happen. This is a problem in which Sanders realized the staff member overstepped himself and Sanders acted and fired the guy. The one who will be hurt in this matter is Sanders. Now Hillary's group complied the data, it does not put the responsibility on Hilary.

[morningfog]

25. You still haven't pointed to a crime.

Which is in contrast to Hillary's boy invoking the 5th to protect against criminal liability and the FBI's investigation.

[Thinkingabout]

27. Point out the crime and liability Hillary has in this incidence. Where is the

"criminal" investigation, it is an investigation. There will probably be an investigation in this matter and if criminal charges are needed then it will probably occur. Surely you don't expect for Sanders to be charged. This guy did a terrible deed, I dint think Sanders sees this as a nothing or he would not have fired him and the guy is accepting responsibility. You can't use evidence in court of someone else's activity as defense of a crime, doesn't work that way.

[morningfog]

28. Dude. The FBI investigates crimes.

The staffer invoked the 5th, which protects against incrimination of criminal liability. Duh. Think about it.

[awake]

3. with HRC history with IT problems now is not the time to raise computer hacking issues

This will backfire and the Emails of HRC now soon to be back in play.

[Thinkingabout]

12. It will backfire on Sanders campaign.

[Metric System]

4. LOOK OVER THERE!!! I guess you're accepting that Sanders staffers did wrong.

[morningfog]

11. No Sanders staffer has invoked the 5th.

But a Hillary staffer has.

[Thinkingabout]

13. Yet.

[ismnotwasm]

5. ...

[WillyT]

6. I Wonder Who Was In Charge Of Her Private Server... Anybody Know ???

& Rec !!!

[Thinkingabout]

14. Maybe the one who got into her database

[seabeyond]

15. Ya, two decades of nothing in the investigation Little less than a day, the OTHER is firing people.

shifting the blame to others, and threatening law suits against our party cause his people fucked up.

Tell me about it.

[morningfog]

18. You don't understand. The FBI has not been investigating Hillary for two decades.

What the fuck? The FBI has just started it's criminal investigation into Hillary.

There are no such investigations into Bernie.

[seabeyond]

21. I do understand. I understand Sanders has done nothing but attack Dems. Now his people hack

into Clinton's info. And Sanders and his people blame everyone except take ownership. I understand before a GE, Sanders is causing a ruckus for his own personal ego, and not taking responsibility. Damn straight I understand.

All the while using Democratic resources asking for the Democratic base vote.

[morningfog]

23. I assume you had a point in that rambling, but I didn't get it.

[JoePhilly]

19. SQUIRREL!!!!

[morningfog]

20. 5th Amendment and criminal liability!

[JoePhilly]

24. Holy shit ... a herd of squirrels!!!!

[morningfog]

26. FB FUCKING I!!

Haunting Hillary day in day out.

[mhatrw]

29. It's like the exposed classified info calling the investigatory query breached. nt