2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI guess Sanders staffers are too young to think about Watergate.
Because the beginning of the end came with the break-in.
R B Garr
(17,023 posts)their arrogance at being accountable.
Berniegate!
SunSeeker
(51,884 posts)And this was not a low level staffer who did it.
jfern
(5,204 posts)information on her home servers
SunSeeker
(51,884 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)SunSeeker
(51,884 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)laughter palatable and neither do I.
I have stayed out of Emailgate for the most part because it was used by Repugs (who did the same thing) as a talking point but if you guys are going to use these dirty politics against Bernie (who had absolutely nothing to do with the breach or the subsequent viewing of data retrieved by it) then all bets are off.
And if Bernie doesn't get his access back and Hillary by some miracle become President, she will be viewed for all eternity as illegitimate as Dubya.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Do you seriously think you have tapes on Bernie? No, but you will continue to immorally denigrate him, won't you?
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Do I go straight to hell for that, or do I just have to spend a few millennia in purgatory?
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)That you apply your gift for great moral clarity to the issue of a campaign stealing data from its opponents?
SunSeeker
(51,884 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)The vendor said the access was inadvertent. And yet people get in a lot of trouble for taking top secret information out of the office. A lot.
SunSeeker
(51,884 posts)No Hillary staffer, let alone her National Data Director, used 4 accounts to search Bernie's campaign info.
jfern
(5,204 posts)A shitty DNC led by a Hillary supporter chose a shitty vendor run by a former Hillary CTO that had a bug that the Bernie campaign had reported months ago and was never fixed. That's not a Bernie problem, that's a Hillary problem.
SunSeeker
(51,884 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Not what was searched
SunSeeker
(51,884 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)And even if they searched for Hillary stuff, did they open it? Maybe they just wanted to confirm it was a bug before reporting it.
SunSeeker
(51,884 posts)Nothing innocent or inadvertent about that. They were not searching for a "bug." They knew what this was. They knew the firewall had gone down in the past. They reported it previously to the vendor/DNC.
I am sure we will know more soon. There is now an investigation.
I'm going to sign off for the night.
Try to get some sleep.
jfern
(5,204 posts)Nothing about what they searched for.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)campaign did. So either her IT staff is incompetent and never noticed the breach or, more likely, they viewed and used the data and failed to report it.
riversedge
(70,536 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Very different from some random staffer happened to open the wrong campaign's information thanks to a bug.
riversedge
(70,536 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)Those concerns that Hillary Clinton's private email server had classified intel? They're apparently well-founded. Sources for Fox News and Politico maintain that two of the messages sent to Clinton were labeled as "top secret" when fresh. One of them was eventually reduced to "secret," but critics say that's beside the point: they're worried that the email wasn't subject to tougher government security standards, and could have been compromised.
Whether or not the messages are a legal problem for Clinton and her presidential election campaign are another matter. The FBI is still investigating whether or not the politician violated the law by running her own server instead of funneling everything through official channels. Any findings of illegality may well derail Clinton's campaign, but a declaration of innocence could easily thwart further attacks.
http://www.engadget.com/2015/12/16/clinton-server-had-top-secret-email/
riversedge
(70,536 posts)SunSeeker
(51,884 posts)R B Garr
(17,023 posts)the Revolution. Clinton was not breaching Bernie's campaign files to gain an advantage.
jfern
(5,204 posts)R B Garr
(17,023 posts)Now there is an investigstion.
RandySF
(60,046 posts)they took advantage of the open door to trespass into the Clinton campaign's data?
jfern
(5,204 posts)A national data manager wouldn't have a clue.
jfern
(5,204 posts)RandySF
(60,046 posts)riversedge
(70,536 posts)Sanders campaign accesses Clinton data, gets suspended from party voter files http://cnn.it/1MkyRMC #p2 #uniteblue #feeltheBern(NOT)
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)And I let him know, and then later, I see it's still open, I have the right to go in and steal his stuff?
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)You want to compare this to Watergate? Really?
This will cause a huge chasm in the party, even more than already exists.
RandySF
(60,046 posts)Is that why the starter (and probably others) went to the effort of probing into the Clinton Campaign's data? There's a saying around here IOKIYAR (It's ok if you are Republican), and that seems to be prevalent among Sanders's people. The cause is so just, that they can do anything. The first lie, that it was a low level staffer, was rebuffed. The second lie, that only one person did it, is hig doubtful with the report that FOUR accounts were used. So what else are they lying about?
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Now it stands for Its OK If You Are A Revolutionary.
senz
(11,945 posts)Because they are showing us exactly who they are.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)A chasm might be a good thing, if that's what it takes. I welcome this war.
daybranch
(1,309 posts)the overriding issue was the coverup and there certainly does not appear one here. So quit hoping that Bernie people are crooks like Nixon. Bernie is clean and generally accepted as running a clean campaign by most people because he does. If you want some dirty tricks, look at past and present DNC actions instigated to prevent Bernie's message from getting out.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)Let's have the names of who used the other accounts that snooped at the Clonton data.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Bernie is not a crook.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Equally relevant comparison