Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 09:47 AM Dec 2015

Bernie was right, the climate accord in Paris didn't go near far enough

Last month was the warmest November on record by an incredible margin, according to NASA measurements. The global average temperature for the month was 1.05 degrees Celsius, or about 1.9 degrees Fahrenheit, warmer than the 1951 to 1980 average. It’s also the second month in a row that Earth’s temperature exceeded 1 degree Celsius above average.

It was just in October that our planet first exceeded the 1-degree benchmark in NASA’s records, dating to 1880. Prior to that, the largest anomaly was 0.97 degrees Celsius in January 2007.

The recent measurements become even more significant in light of the recent Paris accord, in which 196 countries boldly agreed to limit the planet’s warming to “well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degree Celsius.” The extraordinary warmth of October and November helped push this year well-past the 1-degree benchmark.

We have known that 2015 is all but certain to be the warmest year on record, though we did not know by how much it would be. Given the November report, 2015 will eclipse last year as the warmest year on record by a huge margin.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2015/12/15/november-2015-was-earths-hottest-such-month-on-record-by-a-huge-margin/

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bernie was right, the climate accord in Paris didn't go near far enough (Original Post) peacebird Dec 2015 OP
I wish he told President Obama his plan to get other countries to agree to a stronger agreement. Skinner Dec 2015 #1
maybe leading by example? reddread Dec 2015 #10
Would be nice. daleanime Dec 2015 #31
it's amazing how doing what's right actually changes everything tk2kewl Dec 2015 #35
The reason certain parts of the agreement were not binding were because of the USA. JonLeibowitz Dec 2015 #23
I'm open to hearing that Bernie criticized Republicans treestar Dec 2015 #28
They are deniers, but they were not in Paris yeoman6987 Dec 2015 #30
So it didn't go far enough, Tommy2Tone Dec 2015 #2
Nope, merely stating we need to do a lot more peacebird Dec 2015 #4
we know that already treestar Dec 2015 #27
And apparently do like it.... daleanime Dec 2015 #33
Any specifics?? Historic NY Dec 2015 #32
yes more could have been done. stonecutter357 Dec 2015 #3
That's a disturbing article. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #5
The final graphic is somewhat terrifying. We need to be actively working on alternative energy peacebird Dec 2015 #8
Thanks for posting it. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #9
Agreed - Other Posts Here This A.M. Already Are Pointing To Countries That Aren't Going To Abide.... global1 Dec 2015 #13
He did say it was a step forward but I really can't fault him for being honest about the reality. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #14
It is mindful cheerleading because they are getting somewhere treestar Dec 2015 #26
It doesn't go far enough, listen to the scientists not the cheerleaders. beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #39
The issue is Bernie believes he could convince 196 country leaders better then the president could yeoman6987 Dec 2015 #34
Where did he say that? Link please. Tia! beam me up scottie Dec 2015 #38
We can only go as far as technology allows... JaneyVee Dec 2015 #6
not a technology or economic problem. it is a political problem. Agony Dec 2015 #16
We have the technology for 100% carbon-free energy, everywhere. jeff47 Dec 2015 #37
this in a nutshell is why bernie will never get anything done. drray23 Dec 2015 #7
where is he going to get the $100/b a year hill2016 Dec 2015 #11
Where are you going to find another planet to live on? peacebird Dec 2015 #12
The First Rule Of Primary Fight Club: Bernie Is Always Right Blue_Adept Dec 2015 #15
Well, not always BUT often enough that Hillary is adopting his positions...... peacebird Dec 2015 #18
no no, I've heard it here enough Blue_Adept Dec 2015 #20
I won't attempt to dissuade you. 'We came, we saw, he died' has plenty to atone for peacebird Dec 2015 #21
We all have plenty to atone for Blue_Adept Dec 2015 #22
OK....then name things Bernie has been wrong about. nt Cali_Democrat Dec 2015 #25
What the hell is Bernie talking about? Obama put a HALT to climate change. Stopped it cold! Scuba Dec 2015 #17
Love it! peacebird Dec 2015 #19
they always complain about cult comparisons, and then go full Juche MisterP Dec 2015 #40
Any agreement between sovereign nations treestar Dec 2015 #24
The US needs to lead by example AgingAmerican Dec 2015 #29
K&R for truth. Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #36
 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
10. maybe leading by example?
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 10:06 AM
Dec 2015

Last edited Wed Dec 16, 2015, 12:45 PM - Edit history (1)

pushing fracking (keystone XL) as far as they could until backing down after the fact?
not the right direction, but exactly indicative of the real trajectory.
you might believe in Santa Claus, but dont fall for
sugar free confections,
fat free salad dressing,
last minute objections to unrestrained, destructive, insane modern day fracking.
Jerry Brown is the poster child for the practice (offshore fracking in marine sanctuaries? Family tradition. Fracking inland, fracking in a drought, fracking with gumbo shrimp, fracking and pancakes, fracking in a drought, not the prohibition. What comes out of
his mouth has little bearing on what is in his heart or mind about the industry and practice.
i think we have had enough lies circulated for the sake of petrodollars by pocket pets.
Its too late anyway, lets just face reality and name the culprits who pulled this caper off.
It wasnt Exxon.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
35. it's amazing how doing what's right actually changes everything
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 12:04 PM
Dec 2015

while doing what's half right changes almost nothing

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
23. The reason certain parts of the agreement were not binding were because of the USA.
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 11:33 AM
Dec 2015

Because we wouldn't be able to pass certain things as a treaty.

Let's not jump to blame other countries so fast..

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
30. They are deniers, but they were not in Paris
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 11:43 AM
Dec 2015

What ever deal was made was due to the president good and bad.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
5. That's a disturbing article.
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 09:56 AM
Dec 2015

I don't understand why what Bernie said was so upsetting.

Considering what's happening to our planet I think I prefer honesty to mindless cheerleading.

After reading that article I don't think I could gin up outrage against him if I tried.


peacebird

(14,195 posts)
8. The final graphic is somewhat terrifying. We need to be actively working on alternative energy
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 10:00 AM
Dec 2015

And carbon sequestration at a minimum. That and coming up with viable cost effective means of producing (or purifying) water for use in food production and for drinking. I read an article last week about how slowly our underground resevoirs actually refill - and it is *much* more slowly than we pull the water out

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
9. Thanks for posting it.
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 10:05 AM
Dec 2015

They also criticised Bernie when he linked climate change to the increase in terrorism.

He's never been the kind of politician who cares about getting flak for saying what needs to be said, the issues are too important.

global1

(25,253 posts)
13. Agreed - Other Posts Here This A.M. Already Are Pointing To Countries That Aren't Going To Abide....
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 10:14 AM
Dec 2015

by this agreement. Japan, South Korea and India are all stepping up to using more coal.

Bernie was right - it didn't go far enough.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
14. He did say it was a step forward but I really can't fault him for being honest about the reality.
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 10:17 AM
Dec 2015

Last edited Wed Dec 16, 2015, 11:02 AM - Edit history (1)

I think people are manufacturing reasons to be outraged.

If Bernie said water was wet we'd be subjected to a dozen ops explaining why he was wrong about that too.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
26. It is mindful cheerleading because they are getting somewhere
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 11:36 AM
Dec 2015

You can bet most people will cheer that on. Well, except the deniers.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
34. The issue is Bernie believes he could convince 196 country leaders better then the president could
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 11:47 AM
Dec 2015

How does he know that? Each of the 196 leaders has their own mind and limitations on what they accept. Bernie could have turned away some support if he demanded to much and possibly come away with no deal.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
6. We can only go as far as technology allows...
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 09:59 AM
Dec 2015

We are not at the point yet where we could transition from oil completely. And we have to take into account other countries who lag behind in technology. I am confident we will get there.

Agony

(2,605 posts)
16. not a technology or economic problem. it is a political problem.
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 10:58 AM
Dec 2015
http://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/WWS-50-USState-plans.html

The authors make the case that the resultant total-system costs would be lower than the business-as-usual scenario. Which is great, since BAU sucks, as most everyone agrees (except the people profiting from BAU). What they don't try to show is that the resultant system is the optimal system, i.e., the optimal balance of costs and benefits.

Insisting on 100 percent WWS — excluding nuclear, biomass, cogeneration, natural gas, etc. — almost certainly raises the total-system costs relative to a broader portfolio of low-carbon options. Just a little bit of nuclear or biomass power, for instance, would reduce the amount of power-plant overbuild necessary.

Lots of people are extremely skeptical of Jacobson's work for just this reason. They say, Why not accept a little bit of asthma, or some nuclear waste, in exchange for a cheaper system?

But I think that misses the point. Jacobson has set out to create a benchmark: this is what we could do if we aimed to create an entirely sustainable, pollution-free energy system. After all, the cost-benefit trade-offs of less sustainable systems almost always mean higher benefits for the already privileged and more costs for the already less privileged.

Jacobson's approach is more like political philosopher John Rawls's famous "veil of ignorance" approach. What kind of power system would you choose for society if you had no idea where you might be placed in that society? If you didn't know whether you'd be rich or poor, living in a gated suburb or right next to a power plant or waste dump? You'd probably design a system that is equitable and healthy for everyone.

That's our highest aspiration, and the one Jacobson's work speaks to. Whether we pursue our highest aspirations is up to us.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
37. We have the technology for 100% carbon-free energy, everywhere.
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 12:46 PM
Dec 2015

We even have the technology to literally pull the CO2 from the atmosphere.

What we don't have is the political will to do it. Instead, we have the economic dominance that keeps spewing out more CO2.

drray23

(7,634 posts)
7. this in a nutshell is why bernie will never get anything done.
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 10:00 AM
Dec 2015

He is very good at pointing out what he sees a problems, but never at coming up with realistic concrete solutions. Its his way or the highway. The cop21 agreement may not be perfect but its still a huge step forward. Thats how you solve big problems. You move forward as fast as you can get others to agree with. Better than complaining its no good because it did not go far enough abd end up with no agreement and zero done.


Blue_Adept

(6,399 posts)
20. no no, I've heard it here enough
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 11:28 AM
Dec 2015

Bernie is always right. Hillary is Her Royal Highness that is responsible for every ill in the world. I've gotten the message loud and clear.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
17. What the hell is Bernie talking about? Obama put a HALT to climate change. Stopped it cold!
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 11:21 AM
Dec 2015

Read it right here on DU.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
24. Any agreement between sovereign nations
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 11:34 AM
Dec 2015

is a good thing. None of them are under any political pressure to agree to anything. Criticizing such an agreement as not going far enough is simply ungrateful. Any progress is progress between sovereign nations.

The people using against President Obama that he can't get Congress to go along are golden in comparison to this. President Obama is just another national President - this "leader of the free world" crap gets people believing it literally.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie was right, the cli...