2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie was right, the climate accord in Paris didn't go near far enough
Last month was the warmest November on record by an incredible margin, according to NASA measurements. The global average temperature for the month was 1.05 degrees Celsius, or about 1.9 degrees Fahrenheit, warmer than the 1951 to 1980 average. Its also the second month in a row that Earths temperature exceeded 1 degree Celsius above average.
It was just in October that our planet first exceeded the 1-degree benchmark in NASAs records, dating to 1880. Prior to that, the largest anomaly was 0.97 degrees Celsius in January 2007.
The recent measurements become even more significant in light of the recent Paris accord, in which 196 countries boldly agreed to limit the planets warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degree Celsius. The extraordinary warmth of October and November helped push this year well-past the 1-degree benchmark.
We have known that 2015 is all but certain to be the warmest year on record, though we did not know by how much it would be. Given the November report, 2015 will eclipse last year as the warmest year on record by a huge margin.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2015/12/15/november-2015-was-earths-hottest-such-month-on-record-by-a-huge-margin/
Skinner
(63,645 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 16, 2015, 12:45 PM - Edit history (1)
pushing fracking (keystone XL) as far as they could until backing down after the fact?
not the right direction, but exactly indicative of the real trajectory.
you might believe in Santa Claus, but dont fall for
sugar free confections,
fat free salad dressing,
last minute objections to unrestrained, destructive, insane modern day fracking.
Jerry Brown is the poster child for the practice (offshore fracking in marine sanctuaries? Family tradition. Fracking inland, fracking in a drought, fracking with gumbo shrimp, fracking and pancakes, fracking in a drought, not the prohibition. What comes out of
his mouth has little bearing on what is in his heart or mind about the industry and practice.
i think we have had enough lies circulated for the sake of petrodollars by pocket pets.
Its too late anyway, lets just face reality and name the culprits who pulled this caper off.
It wasnt Exxon.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)while doing what's half right changes almost nothing
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Because we wouldn't be able to pass certain things as a treaty.
Let's not jump to blame other countries so fast..
treestar
(82,383 posts)for this very reason. They are the deniers.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)What ever deal was made was due to the president good and bad.
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)Are Bernie and you suggesting we should not have done the deal?
peacebird
(14,195 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)Historic NY
(37,451 posts)I didn't think so.
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I don't understand why what Bernie said was so upsetting.
Considering what's happening to our planet I think I prefer honesty to mindless cheerleading.
After reading that article I don't think I could gin up outrage against him if I tried.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)And carbon sequestration at a minimum. That and coming up with viable cost effective means of producing (or purifying) water for use in food production and for drinking. I read an article last week about how slowly our underground resevoirs actually refill - and it is *much* more slowly than we pull the water out
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)They also criticised Bernie when he linked climate change to the increase in terrorism.
He's never been the kind of politician who cares about getting flak for saying what needs to be said, the issues are too important.
global1
(25,253 posts)by this agreement. Japan, South Korea and India are all stepping up to using more coal.
Bernie was right - it didn't go far enough.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 16, 2015, 11:02 AM - Edit history (1)
I think people are manufacturing reasons to be outraged.
If Bernie said water was wet we'd be subjected to a dozen ops explaining why he was wrong about that too.
treestar
(82,383 posts)You can bet most people will cheer that on. Well, except the deniers.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)How does he know that? Each of the 196 leaders has their own mind and limitations on what they accept. Bernie could have turned away some support if he demanded to much and possibly come away with no deal.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)We are not at the point yet where we could transition from oil completely. And we have to take into account other countries who lag behind in technology. I am confident we will get there.
Agony
(2,605 posts)The authors make the case that the resultant total-system costs would be lower than the business-as-usual scenario. Which is great, since BAU sucks, as most everyone agrees (except the people profiting from BAU). What they don't try to show is that the resultant system is the optimal system, i.e., the optimal balance of costs and benefits.
Insisting on 100 percent WWS excluding nuclear, biomass, cogeneration, natural gas, etc. almost certainly raises the total-system costs relative to a broader portfolio of low-carbon options. Just a little bit of nuclear or biomass power, for instance, would reduce the amount of power-plant overbuild necessary.
Lots of people are extremely skeptical of Jacobson's work for just this reason. They say, Why not accept a little bit of asthma, or some nuclear waste, in exchange for a cheaper system?
But I think that misses the point. Jacobson has set out to create a benchmark: this is what we could do if we aimed to create an entirely sustainable, pollution-free energy system. After all, the cost-benefit trade-offs of less sustainable systems almost always mean higher benefits for the already privileged and more costs for the already less privileged.
Jacobson's approach is more like political philosopher John Rawls's famous "veil of ignorance" approach. What kind of power system would you choose for society if you had no idea where you might be placed in that society? If you didn't know whether you'd be rich or poor, living in a gated suburb or right next to a power plant or waste dump? You'd probably design a system that is equitable and healthy for everyone.
That's our highest aspiration, and the one Jacobson's work speaks to. Whether we pursue our highest aspirations is up to us.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)We even have the technology to literally pull the CO2 from the atmosphere.
What we don't have is the political will to do it. Instead, we have the economic dominance that keeps spewing out more CO2.
drray23
(7,634 posts)He is very good at pointing out what he sees a problems, but never at coming up with realistic concrete solutions. Its his way or the highway. The cop21 agreement may not be perfect but its still a huge step forward. Thats how you solve big problems. You move forward as fast as you can get others to agree with. Better than complaining its no good because it did not go far enough abd end up with no agreement and zero done.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)to pay the developing countries in climate change aid?
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)Bernie is always right. Hillary is Her Royal Highness that is responsible for every ill in the world. I've gotten the message loud and clear.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Read it right here on DU.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)is a good thing. None of them are under any political pressure to agree to anything. Criticizing such an agreement as not going far enough is simply ungrateful. Any progress is progress between sovereign nations.
The people using against President Obama that he can't get Congress to go along are golden in comparison to this. President Obama is just another national President - this "leader of the free world" crap gets people believing it literally.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Which ain't happening under corporate leadership