2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSo Cornel West dislikes Hillary. The jealous, vindictive person who called Obama
our first "n**erized President" also can't stand Hillary.
Surprise, surprise.
It's a compliment, really, to be loathed by someone this nasty.
"My dear brother Barack Obama has a certain fear of free black men. . . . He has a certain rootlessness, a deracination."
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/c/cornel_west.html#hGH6pGcbi8IbG4MS.99
Rockefeller Republican in blackface.
http://bossip.com/1021630/quote-of-the-day-cornel-west-slams-obama-were-looking-for-john-coltrane-and-got-a-black-kenny-g-43081/
http://www.thenation.com/article/cornel-west-v-barack-obama/
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Because he called the President to task, he's been ostracized by the DNC Machinists plan and simple . And fight for what he how All his life , How could he support Hillary ?
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Treat your body like a machine. Your mind like a castle.[/center][/font][hr]
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)and his comments about Obama. Might give her some mileage. Then again, it might not.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Hint: it predates the Obama administration
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Neither Obama nor West are running for president, last time I checked.
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)And West has been criticizing her, according to something that's on the home page.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)pnwmom
(108,991 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Last edited Mon Dec 14, 2015, 09:50 PM - Edit history (1)
But her continued obsession with Dr. West is rather odd.
The alert swarms are out, truth hurts I guess.
riversedge
(70,299 posts)its the silly season
Response to riversedge (Reply #29)
Post removed
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Cornel West is a divisive figure in the black community and has even gone after many black members of academia.
Calling it an obsession and saying she 'counts the dark faces' at bernie events is a personal attack and very nasty. This post is juat meant to disrupt the thread. Please hide. Please. Stop this madness and rude personal attacks.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Dec 14, 2015, 07:43 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I am not going to hide an accurate post.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Seems pretty spot on
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Did you look at the OP? I just looked results of a jury that left worse than this alone. It is GD-P. Refute it has been a juror's opinion in threads like this.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Fucking lame.
On Mon Dec 14, 2015, 06:18 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
That's quite different than the op's race baiting.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=898203
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Calling the OP a race baiter is vicious, abusive, OTT and not true. This kind of ugly accusation makes DU suck.
JURY RESULTS
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Dec 14, 2015, 06:29 PM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: How is this worthy of an alert?
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Calling this post or the poster 'race baiting' is false, disruptive and rude. That nonsense may be appropriate at a right wing site. It must end at DU.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Really? Another abuse of the alert system.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: OP was quoting Cornell West because OPer disagreed with West's words. The race baiting was West, not OPer. Hide.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)It was a apparent that the post alerted on did not violate TOS.
It's one of the worst features of the jury system.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Jury shopping and alert stalking are despicable.
And that is what was going on in this case.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)Far far more Hillary supporters get hides and most of them questionable.
Your posts are the pot-kettle syndrome.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)you can take your "pot-kettle syndrome" comment and cram it.
I don't alert stalk, and don't enable it.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)The comment (which is in a post in the Bernie Sanders Group) is not even as remotely nasty as anything that he's said about the President.
And don't forget that he has criticized Bernie as well.
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)I suggest you stay out of that group since it upsets you and you aren't able to participate.
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)Thanks anyway for your concern.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)This just more meta about Bernie's supporters from you disguised as "concern".
R B Garr
(16,975 posts)Last edited Tue Dec 15, 2015, 10:34 AM - Edit history (1)
and quit attacking people about where else on the internet they post. You are right: "WHY DO YOU CARE WHAT THEY POST IN THEIR GROUP?"
Exactly! So leave people alone yourself about what else and where they post. Right??!! Right
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I saw what was said on Hillary's Hate Site.
R B Garr
(16,975 posts)when someone was getting abused but couldn't respond in kind or get posts hidden. I was going to point it out, but didn't waste my time. So phony of you.
And over the weekend I saw.plenty of nasty references to DUers on Discussionist, but I bet those site owners won't get attacked. Wink.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)because of the Israel/Palestine issue...I would expect that someone who has been a DSA member for decades would endorse Sanders at some point, though.
JI7
(89,262 posts)About obama. Not that he was critical in itself.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)the language that he used against the president...among other things but I won't be nasty about some of the things that I feel about Dr. West.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)A lot of people don't like her.
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)of the media and sexists everywhere.
Ever since she said she wanted to do more as First Lady than bake cookies, they've been after her.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)And are a result of her own record and policy stances.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)Even without the actual investigations, the circumstances surrounding a long list of her own actions cause a legitimate questioning of her judgment, motives and values. It's not the GOP's fault she made up sniper fire or wrote a bill to ban flag burning or voted for the IWR or receives millions from Wall St. And those examples are a tiny fraction of all the situations she creates all on her own.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)marvelous job at smearing herself.
Flip-flop. Flip-flop. Flip-flop.
artislife
(9,497 posts)People have their own opinions. So what?
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)of what he has previously said about Obama, and what kind of person he is.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Really no one who has read here can escape what the h supporters post onto the GDP over and over.
Repetition. Hmm who else uses it as a tactic?
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)use repetition. How many times have I read here the same tired, recycled stories about Hillary? Could that be what you're referring to?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)Best thing in this tired thread!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)More red baiting?
Guns in checked baggage on Amtrak?
So much fake outrage about Bernie, I wonder where they get the energy.
840high
(17,196 posts)again and again and again.....
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)promote Cornel West, as if his views mean more to African Americans than President Obama's, who chose Hillary to be his Secretary of State.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Get under the bus!
artislife
(9,497 posts)I mean this meme has been going on for months. I guess it bears repeating.
That's a joke.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Looks like this week's recycled theme is Cornell West is a bad bad man and the accompanying fallacy: Bernie is guilty of racism by association.
New memes are expensive.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)I will keep my hero John Lewis, thank you.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Nelson A. Rockefeller was a critical player in this story. Since the 1940s a small
group of liberal Republicans, chiefly from the Northeast, had routinely joined pro-civil
rights Democrats in Congress to sponsor civil rights legislation regarding voting rights,
segregation, and equal employment opportunity. Like their Democratic allies, they
favored a stronger role for the federal government in ensuring racial equality. Such a
position, they maintained, represented a fulfillment of the tradition of Abraham Lincoln.
It also represented good politics, for the black population of many cities in the Northeast
had grown dramatically since the 1940s. In 1960, Rockefeller, who had eyes on the
partys presidential nomination, voiced the concerns of this wing of the GOP in his fight
for a strong civil rights plank at the Republican partys convention in Chicago. He
persuaded nominee Richard Nixon to fight for a civil rights statement that expressed
support for the sit-in demonstrations that had spread across the South that spring.
Southern Republicans, who had grown in number since the mid-1950s, were predictably
outraged. So were other conservatives, who worried about the expanding reach of
government into employment matters and other areas related to private property. The
party retreated from the Nixon/Rockefeller position, but Rockefeller had established
himself as the leader of the pro-civil rights faction of the party at the presidential level.
As the civil rights movement intensified across the South during the Kennedy
administration, battle lines within the Republican party hardened. Rockefeller and other
liberals routinely criticized President Kennedy for being too timid and tardy in
responding to the crisis. During the spring of 1963, Rockefeller blasted Kennedy for
ignoring recommendations of the Civil Rights Commission regarding housing,
employment, voting rights, and education, failing to live up to promises made in the
Democrats civil rights plank of 1960, and appointing anti-civil rights judges to the
Federal bench in the South.
http://www.rockarch.org/publications/resrep/thurber.pdf
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)didn't mean that as a compliment.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)The northern Republicans used to be the good guys.
okasha
(11,573 posts)there was a conservative-moderate-liberal spectrum in both major parties. It was Reagan who polarized the parties, and the division we have now is not an improvement.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)pnwmom
(108,991 posts)MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)Growing old can fuck up your mind, but he had a really good one. Let us all hope he rediscovers it.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)That is like recruiting Noam Chomsky to get the votes of Jewish people.
pnwmom
(108,991 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)pnwmom
(108,991 posts)That's not going to win him a lot of appreciation from most Jewish people.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)cosmicone
(11,014 posts)I am making an objective, bystander comment that Cornell West is anathema to most AAs. AAs adore and exalt Obama by 93% -- getting Obama's critic as your ambassador to AAs was manifestly stupid.
Number23
(24,544 posts)MrWendel
(1,881 posts)are okay with Obama being called a nigger. As long as the perpetrator helps they're guy. Good to know.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Calling someone the N-word is different from describing someone as N*****ized. Here is what West said:
But too many black people are niggerized. I would say the first black president has become the first niggerized black president.
CNN ANCHOR: What do you mean by that?
WEST: A niggerized black person is a black person who is afraid and scared and intimidated when it comes to putting a spotlight on white supremacy and fighting against white supremacy. So when many of us said we have to fight against racism, what were we told? 'No, he can't deal with racism because he has other issues, political calculations. He's the president of all America, not just black America.' We know he's president of all America but white supremacy is American as cherry pie.
We're talking about moral issues, spiritual issues, emotional issues. White supremacy has nothing to do with just skin pigmentation, it has to be what kind of person you want to be, what kind of nation we want to be. Democrats and Republicans play on both of those parties in terms of running away from the vicious legacy of white supremacy until it hits us hard. Thank God for Ferguson. Thank God for the young folk of all colors. Thank God for Staten Island and fighting there. Thank God in Baltimore, now the precious folk in Charleston.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/06/22/cornel_west_on_obama_the_first_black_president_has_become_the_first_niggerized_black_president.html
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)In a black barbershop, that's OK.
As a way to publically address and criticize the president it is not...you may notice that black people obviously don't like what Dr. West has said even though, yes, Dyson made a somewhat similar criticism.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)or what I should be passionate about. But that's just me.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)I will only say that no black person that I know or have read supports the specific language that Dr. West has used against President Obama; only large faction of white liberals (who probably don't know any better) and some far left blacks use that language...other blacks have criticized the president on similar grounds and not used that language.
Dr. West said it to shock and he certainly did that.
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/04/27/1380705/-OK-OK-another-Dyson-West-comment-here
and that pretty much remains my view on this subject.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)Uncle Tom? Because that is what sums up Cornel West's view on Obama.But hey, there IS an election at stake so...meh.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)They're vindictive and jealous.
A shame that Mrs Clinton can't get any momentum on any issue - the only things she seems to have are her gender and lots of rich donors.
Gothmog
(145,530 posts)Sanders is hurting his chances with West serving as a surrogate
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)West has been off the rails for years & lost all credibility a long time ago. The only reason he gets the airtime he does is because certain so called liberals will use any minority when the message is convenient for them. As soon as the deviate from what they deem acceptable they will throw them under the bus. I.e. John Lewis who has a million times more credibility & character in his pinky toe then Cornell West could ever hope to have.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)I couldn't possibly care any less who or what he likes or doesn't like.