Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(59,079 posts)
Sat Dec 12, 2015, 01:13 AM Dec 2015

Sanders calls for gun study funding after 1996 vote against similar research

The email came a day after 14 people were killed in a shooting in San Bernardino, California.

Congress, at the urging of gun rights supporters, put restrictions on CDC funding of gun research into the federal budget in 1996.

Sanders, then a Vermont U.S. representative, voted against an amendment, which ultimately failed, that would have authorized funding for such research, according to the website for the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives. ( 1.usa.gov/1HJAOXR)

Sanders, now a senator, is vying with front-runner Hillary Clinton and former Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley for the Democratic nomination for the November 2016 presidential election. Gun control has emerged as an issue following a recent series of mass shootings.

Sanders has been dogged by criticism from gun-control groups since entering the presidential race.

While in the House of Representatives, he supported a 2005 federal law that shielded gun manufacturers, distributors and dealers from civil liability for mass shootings, and voted against the 1993 Brady Bill that imposed mandatory background checks and waiting periods for gun purchases.


www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-sanders-guns-idUSKBN0TN06O20151204#xqV3jM9TZVfhHyXd.99

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders calls for gun study funding after 1996 vote against similar research (Original Post) RandySF Dec 2015 OP
Good, he has finally "evolved." Took him long enough. Hoyt Dec 2015 #1
So he's not always "consistent".. which makes damn sense. Cha Dec 2015 #2
He's come down to earth on this issue, finally. MADem Dec 2015 #3
That was a tiny speck buried in a massive bill AgingAmerican Dec 2015 #4
 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
4. That was a tiny speck buried in a massive bill
Sat Dec 12, 2015, 05:20 AM
Dec 2015

Which included things like mandatory minimums. More corporate dishonesty. Reuters didn't link to the actual bill for a reason.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/104th-congress/house-bill/3755/text

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders calls for gun stu...