Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

titaniumsalute

(4,742 posts)
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 03:02 PM Sep 2012

Clinton versus Bush - The Relevant versus the Irrelevant

Last night a former President, Bill Clinton, kicked ass and took names for his extremely impactful speech. Bill Clinton was President 12 years ago. The most recent former President, GWB, has been absolutely absent from the right's campaign. No speeches, no appearances, no ads, no nothing.

So what should that simply tell Americans (especially Independents). I think we need to mention this to EVERY Republican and Independent we come across.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton versus Bush - The Relevant versus the Irrelevant (Original Post) titaniumsalute Sep 2012 OP
Clinton is at 66% approval in Gallup this Summer TroyD Sep 2012 #1
Huh. Wonder why???? titaniumsalute Sep 2012 #2
Well he did hand over a huge budget surplus to W dballance Sep 2012 #3

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
1. Clinton is at 66% approval in Gallup this Summer
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 03:04 PM
Sep 2012

Meanwhile George W. Bush polls as the most unpopular President of all.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
3. Well he did hand over a huge budget surplus to W
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 03:23 PM
Sep 2012

He also didn't start any illegal wars where thousands or our proud service members were killed.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton versus Bush - The...