Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 04:52 PM Nov 2015

Why Hillary Clinton Is Right About Pfizer







http://time.com/4125662/hillary-clinton-pfizer/


Why Hillary Clinton Is Right About Pfizer


Rana Foroohar @RanaForoohar

10:14 AM ET
The problem with tax "inversion" deals


Three cheers for Hillary Clinton and other politicians who are decrying Pfizer’s tax “inversion” deal that would allow it to take over an Irish pharma company and relocate there, thus saving $21 billion in American taxes. Tax inversion deals—mergers done pretty much for the sole purpose of saving tax money by moving to a foreign tax jurisdiction—have been on the rise for a while now. One of the many reasons they are so egregious is that the very firms that are most able to do them—including pharmaceutical and tech companies that have most of their value in intellectual property that can be easily relocated elsewhere—have also been the biggest beneficiaries of government help.

Pfizer and other such firms will argue that they need to pay lower taxes to fund the research that results in miracle drugs. But that is a myth. We credit the private sector for the innovation and growth in our economy. But a number of academics and policy thinkers, including University of Sussex economist Mariana Mazzucato, author of The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths, argue powerfully that it is the government (and thus taxpayers) rather than the private sector that deserves the credit for such innovation. “Every major technological change in recent years traces most of its funding back to the state,” says Mazzucato, who backs the claim up with powerful statistics and anecdotes in her book. Most parts of the smartphone that make it smart–GPS, touchscreens, the Internet–were advanced by the Defense Department. Tesla’s batteries came out of a Department of Energy grant. Google’s search algorithm was boosted by a National Science Foundation innovation.

Likewise, many new drugs that have made big money for firms like Pfizer have come out of NIH research. The National Institutes of Health have spent almost a trillion dollars since its founding on the research that created both the pharmaceutical and the biotech sectors—with venture capitalists only entering biotech once the red carpet was laid down in the 1980s.

So why the mythology that the private sector deserves all the profits and the credit for innovation? ...............
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Hillary Clinton Is Right About Pfizer (Original Post) riversedge Nov 2015 OP
Because she is Hillary.... daleanime Nov 2015 #1
LOL! I got it! It was amusing! NurseJackie Nov 2015 #3
ok. the dems agree that it sucks restorefreedom Nov 2015 #2

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
1. Because she is Hillary....
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 04:59 PM
Nov 2015

and is right about all things?



Sorry, you have no idea how hard I tried to keep a straight face. Oh well, carry on.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Hillary Clinton Is Ri...