Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton's pledge to avoid middle-class tax hikes is bad news for progressive politics (Vox)
Hillary Clinton like Barack Obama before her wants voters to know that however much she may favor defending and expanding useful federal programs, she won't be asking the 97 percent or so of American households that earn less than $250,000 a year. She's so eager to make this known, she's even made it a point of pride in her primary campaign against Bernie Sanders.
The bar on middle-class tax hikes is the perfect policy stance for a 21st-century Democrat, blending timidity in the face of the public's skepticism about tax hikes with boldness in the face of the liberal base's rage about income inequality. And directionally it's the right idea. A huge share of the income gains over the past generation have gone to a tiny minority of high-income households, so those are the ones who are going to have to pay the bulk of the tab for useful new investments.
But offered as a formal Grover Norquiststyle pledge, the way Barack Obama and Clinton have, it's also destructive of the long-term possibilities of progressive governance. The best and most effective American (and, for that matter, foreign) social programs are used and paid for by everyone, creating a virtuous cycle that keeps them reasonably effective and reasonably popular. Democratic communications professionals including people who've worked for Obama and people who currently work for Clinton swear the tax pledge is a political necessity. If that's true, it also speaks to a certain amount of intellectual bankruptcy in contemporary American liberalism. It's an ideology that stands for the creation of new government programs but won't stand up for the idea that these programs are actually sufficiently valuable to ask people to pay for them.
The bar on middle-class tax hikes is the perfect policy stance for a 21st-century Democrat, blending timidity in the face of the public's skepticism about tax hikes with boldness in the face of the liberal base's rage about income inequality. And directionally it's the right idea. A huge share of the income gains over the past generation have gone to a tiny minority of high-income households, so those are the ones who are going to have to pay the bulk of the tab for useful new investments.
But offered as a formal Grover Norquiststyle pledge, the way Barack Obama and Clinton have, it's also destructive of the long-term possibilities of progressive governance. The best and most effective American (and, for that matter, foreign) social programs are used and paid for by everyone, creating a virtuous cycle that keeps them reasonably effective and reasonably popular. Democratic communications professionals including people who've worked for Obama and people who currently work for Clinton swear the tax pledge is a political necessity. If that's true, it also speaks to a certain amount of intellectual bankruptcy in contemporary American liberalism. It's an ideology that stands for the creation of new government programs but won't stand up for the idea that these programs are actually sufficiently valuable to ask people to pay for them.
more..
http://www.vox.com/2015/11/23/9780162/clinton-middle-class-tax
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 464 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton's pledge to avoid middle-class tax hikes is bad news for progressive politics (Vox) (Original Post)
yodermon
Nov 2015
OP
djean111
(14,255 posts)1. Like I would believe a Hillary Pledge, anyway. n/t
arcane1
(38,613 posts)2. Especially since she can't be trusted to tell the truth n/t
MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)4. And there is always the possibility
that she will "evolve" on an issue.
Truprogressive85
(900 posts)3. What we knew all along a republican-lite plan from HRC
I rather pay more in taxes and see everyone have healthcare and paid family leave
Do not see why in a Democratic primary this is even an issues