Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
3. Well the SOS never said directly whether he would or wouldn't allow him on the ballot
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 02:28 PM
Nov 2015

There was legitimate cause for concern, but nothing conspiratorial.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
5. There was never cause for concern.
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 02:30 PM
Nov 2015

The moment his photo showed up on the DNC website, he was a Democratic primary candidate. The NH SoS was not about to keep him off the ballot. It was a manufactured issue, completely.

Now, there are some states where the requirements for a ballot appearance can be hard to meet. Candidates' organizations are dealing with those states, as they always have to.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
9. I never said there was an effort to keep him off the ballot.
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 02:37 PM
Nov 2015

The SOS never ruled out that he would be excluded, despite multiple direct questions to that effect. Therefore, cause for concern.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
4. I always thought it was wierd. But could never figure out what purpose it served
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 02:28 PM
Nov 2015

to manufacture it in the first place. Sympathy? Publicity?

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
6. It's the martyr thing.
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 02:31 PM
Nov 2015

Poor Bernie might not get on the New Hampshire ballot. Isn't that outrageous? That's why.

Omaha Steve

(99,660 posts)
12. It was a Republican POTUS candidate that filed the complaint
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 02:55 PM
Nov 2015

http://andyforpresident.blogspot.com/

And he is taking it to court now: Also, because of the fact that I am preparing to file a court challenge to the hearing, I would like to make a record that I have made a good faith effort to narrow the legal and factual disputes before the Commission, before going to court, particularly since the court challenge will be filed momentarily.

The commission was similarly unanimous in rejecting a complaint by Andy Martin, a presidential hopeful from Manchester, that Sanders was ineligible because he was elected to the U.S. Senate as an Independent from Vermont. - See more at: http://www.unionleader.com/Primary_Ballot_Commission_upholds_candidates#sthash.qi3ApBDW.dpuf

Gothmog

(145,321 posts)
7. The DNC and the Clinton campaign each told NH to let Sanders on the ballot
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 02:34 PM
Nov 2015

As a supporter of Hillary Clinton I am glad that this issue was resolved. It would be stupid to exclude Sanders from the ballot and I am personally glad that this issue has gone away

Gothmog

(145,321 posts)
13. The Clinton Campaign is the only party with standing to complain and they waived that claim
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 03:09 PM
Nov 2015

The only parties adversly affected in theory by allowing Sanders on the ballot are the Clinton and the O'Malley campaigns and they are in effect waiving this conflict. If the Clinton campaign took this court, there is a technical argument that could be used to keep Sanders off the ballot but such action would not be consistent with the ideals of the Clinton campaign (i.e. to win fairly in such a fashion that she can united the party following the nomination process)

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
11. Too bad, really.
Tue Nov 24, 2015, 02:39 PM
Nov 2015

Then, you can't see this, either. That sort of makes DU an echo chamber for you, I guess.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie is on the New Hamp...