2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOverheard at the bar
(Aka as a "pub", but for folks that can't afford 10 bucks for a beer)
"I ain't voting for no socialist"
Rest of bar patrons: "Me neither"
Cleita
(75,480 posts)referring to?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Where "the people" go to drink normal priced beer and hang out. True story, and I wouldn't have mentioned it except I saw the cute anecdote about the "pub" conversation.
Heartwarming, don't you think?
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)than I hear anything bad about Bernie.
And, I inserted the meaning. They say the word.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)LOL!
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I hear that everywhere.
But, you see, I'm not especially bothered by that word. I happen to think female dogs are cool. Comparing me to one is not sweat off my brow.
someone who would say that I'm sure absolutely loves Hillary. Guys in pubs drinking a Budweiser - oh yeah, they love Hillary almost as much as they love the NFL.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Is that the vote we are supposed to be courting?
Just curious.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)$1 a pull hanging out at the public house doing nothing? The socialists are out canvassing and attending city council meetings, going to meet ups with like minded socialists to get our country to again be a place for the middle class to prosper, including you and the guy who is making a lot of money off of you with his cheap beer.
Have fun.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Bernie supporters apparently hang out in "pubs". Now here's a pro tip - the beer in pubs tastes the same as beer in bars. They just charge twice as much for it.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)who hate socialists. I don't know any Bernie supporters that hang out in either bars or "pubs". I don't think you know any either. The Bernie supporters in my area are organizing and working for him. The strongest drink imbibed is coffee and most don't even drink that.
840high
(17,196 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Just because your friends hang out at fancy pubs.
840high
(17,196 posts)place for democrats. I don't drink - but loved going there for the discussions.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Yes, they like to have their salons in pubs. Bars aren't hip enough.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)"Hurr hurr, your candidate is dumb 'cause you say pop instead of soda!"
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)why just last week I was speaking with some rough and tumble reg'lar workin' folks at a Hillary Clinton $60,000 a plate fundraiser, and indeed they all agreed that the effete snobs supporting the Sanders campaign were much too elitist for their rough-hewn and workaday sensibilities.
840high
(17,196 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)I suppose a big speech explaining the differences might help...
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Why didn't Bernie think of that. LOL!
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)It actually *is* a problem. I found, to my dismay, explaining the difference on more than occasion when Senator Sanders was mentioned. Not that I made any difference to those types of thinkers.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)If you make a big speech and nobody really noticed did it really happen?
One could make a koan out of that statement
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I'm zen like that. Interesting to ponder.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)But, it's still breaking through.
SunSeeker
(51,571 posts)The same old stuff about how he just wants to be like Denmark. Except of course Denmark is not a democratic socialist country, as its leader recently said, correcting Bernie.
If Bernie was going to do that, it is hard to understand why he waited so long--even putting off the speech. Odd.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/national/bernie-sanderss-socialism-speech-in-less-than-3-minutes/2015/11/19/1b8e4620-8efc-11e5-934c-a369c80822c2_video.html
CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/19/politics/bernie-sanders-democratic-socialist-speech/
USA Today: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2015/11/18/sen-bernie-sanders-explain-his-embrace-democratic-socialism/75987572/
many many more
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Not only would we lose the White House, but most every state would go solid red downticket, and the Nader SCOTUS would be extended an extra thirty years, minimum.
I think you're exactly right.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)by nominating someone who has no cross-over appeal and is considered a liar by more than half the population.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I have to concede that Bernie might take VT.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)But then Sanders votes with the Republicans on gun issues so maybe they will consider him a Republican.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Would be swept into office on Bernie's coat tails
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Ok, that was funny!
MFrohike
(1,980 posts)Last I checked, 2/3 of the elected seats in the country have gone red since 2010. 30 some odd governors and legislatures, both chambers on the federal level, and tons of judicial seats have gone to the right.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Rather than try to understand a pretty wide array of causation.
MFrohike
(1,980 posts)Last I checked, I undermined a stupid argument and did nothing else. There's plenty of reasons to support or dislike any of the Democratic candidates, but bullshit arguments easily disproven by reality aren't among those reasons. You may not like the reality, but that's ok. After all, reality doesn't care if you believe it.
As for causation, I didn't speak to it. The only thing I will note is that the supposed realignment that was celebrated in 2006 and 2008 is toast. Rather than trade ideological talking points that simply display a lack of thought, it'd be wiser to examine what actually happened and why it happened. I have no illusions that it will happen, but I can hope.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Thank you that was a thing of beauty
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)His cross-over appeal is way larger than Clinton's, you see? It's the youth vote.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Haven't seen that type in our local bar.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)True that.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)It seems to be full of racist, homophobic, misogynists.
This one sounds much nicer.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Real Dems hang out at bars. Just ask your Union friends.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I thought that would be understood, but apparently not.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)a bunch of bullshit.
tech3149
(4,452 posts)What did you do to open the discussion and broaden their understanding of what any form of socialism is? What we do in this next election cycle really does matter so you are either working for positive change or more of the same.
It's a question that has been asked before and drawn blood too many times.
Which side are you on?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I don't want Bernie as president either.
tech3149
(4,452 posts)Must be working well for you.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Yes.
tech3149
(4,452 posts)Back when Obama was the hot new thing there were indications that he was a true believer in the free market capitalist fantasy. Most people didn't see it for the fine rhetoric masking the meat in the sandwich. That was proven by his appointments after his election. I don't expect anything less or more from Ms Clinton.
More of the same is not enough for this old man.
Sanders is the best alternative to really change the system to work for all of us from my perspective.
He may not win the nomination but whatever the outcome he is the tip of the spear of political change that might lead to truly representative government.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)We need a progressive realist in the presidency. Not a pie in the sky fabulist like Sanders. Dude has accomplished nothing in 25 years except yelling at people. He has zero ability to create change, as he has amply demonstrated over and over again.
He lost me years ago when he dissed Obama and called for a primary of him. He is the epitome of the circular firing squad that prevents the Dems from advancing our agenda.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)at this point what you're saying is either willful ignorance or political hackery.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)gwheezie
(3,580 posts)I spent a week with a variety of ages and political viewpoints and all of them said Hillary would be the best choice against the GOP in the GE.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)I don't know about the Dems, but the Repubs would LOVE Hillary to win, because she would be so easily beat.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)In your real world. Here in the bubble HRC is the essence of evil. In my state I'm afraid Bernie will not fare well.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I was born and raised in a union town, by union patents. Steeped in politics since I was a little kid. I know "real" Dems when I see them. I only know one socialist though. Unfortunately she can't vote because she's not a citizen.
840high
(17,196 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Instead of that fancy "pub" beer your friends drink? LOL!
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)In a Seattle district called Fremont. It was the real deal, bullets holes, fights, drug dealing, loud music--about a hundred Harley's out front on a good night. Lots of good times. When the area was gentrified, and I kid you not--they turned it into an "Ale House" Ugh.
The rest of the story is the building got historic landmark status and was moved elsewhere-- but what a way to ruin a great bar.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)My neighborhood has one working class bar left. The rest are the pubs filled with hipsters. On the other hand, Fremont has the statue of Lenin. Or did the move that?
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)Someone painted his hand red last I saw it
oasis
(49,389 posts)I was in Vegas this weekend and mentioned the name "Bernie Sanders" on three separate occasions; one to a cabbie; one to a hotel desk clerk and one more to a cafe waitress. Each reacted with a blank look as if to say "Who the hell is that?". I had to explain to these folks that he was a candidate for president.
I never brought up the subject of him being a "socialist" since they didn't have a clue he even existed.
Bernie supporters have a really tough sales job ahead of them. "Double" tough.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)oasis
(49,389 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)The conversations go something like this...
What do you think of Bernie Sanders?
Who? Oh you mean the socialist?
Yeah, they have work to do...
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)In that very same "bar", six months from now if HRC is the nominee, all your friends who won't vote for socialist Sanders will be ranting and ravings about Clinton being a Marxist, Commie, Socialist, or the like.
They might be your allies now that they are against Sanders, but I sincerely doubt many of them will be voting for Clinton.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)They don't actually sit around smearing Dems all day.
They only sit around using socialist as an invective. Hardly consistent with what I find from most Democrats.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)That's quite an accomplishment! Congrats!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Oh, sorry, wrong bar.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)sorry, just thinking that was what this thread was missing.
silenttigersong
(957 posts)Did you do a poll?
silenttigersong
(957 posts)Bill and Val
MFrohike
(1,980 posts)You can always tell the primary populists; they don't know the price of beer.
The act would be more convincing without the discussion of zen koans upthread. In the future, if you really want to play anti-intellectual, commit to it. It's a rookie mistake.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)MFrohike
(1,980 posts)This whole thread reads like a lazy hipster's ode to pointlessness.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)"Overheard in the PUB" thread. LOL!
Response to MaggieD (Reply #86)
MFrohike This message was self-deleted by its author.
ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)I'll just sit back with my 40 and watch.
Response to ismnotwasm (Reply #89)
MFrohike This message was self-deleted by its author.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Rightly or wrongly, the word and label "socialist" will be the Achilles' Heel of Bernie's campaign. The GOP money machine would exploit it with great success. (This will be compounded by the fact that Bernie insists on running a campaign financed only by "small donors", knowing that the GOP will not do the same ... a foolish mistake, and another sign of a weak campaign.)
In the minds of many ill-informed voters, the word "socialist" is equivalent to "communist". (But, out in the real world, you can count on me to not dissuade others of that notion. I'll just smile in agreement.)
Cleita
(75,480 posts)first time for a President don't see socialism and communism as the evil system that we who were raised during the Cold War do. Those who equate socialism as the same thing as Soviet Russia are dinosaurs politically and are becoming fewer and fewer in number.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)It's a comforting thought and I'm sure that will help when Bernie runs again for the 2020 nomination.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I am betting decades.
marlakay
(11,473 posts)I went to one on Monday and when I mentioned I was for Bernie bartender fist bumped me, I get a lot of that when I mention his name and all the people working there smiled.
Everyone else at bar heard me talking and not a single person felt the need to pipe in anything negative.