2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI seriously think that only Bernie's most die hard supporters made it through his entire speech
I know I didn't listen to the whole thing. I kinda got bored part way through and moved on with my life. I came back into the room and noticed my ipad playing and then remembered I was listening to his speech. Oops! I bet not many minds were changed at all. Just my opinion.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'm sorry but it was part history lesson, part lecture, and part stump speech.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)At least you had your IPad!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)semester. Oooooohhh!!! I NEED AN IPAD PRO RIGHT NOW!!! Need it so bad.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Sleek, fast & all yours.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)LiberalArkie
(15,719 posts)I do believe in private companies that thrive and invest and grow in America, companies that create jobs here rather than companies that are shutting down in America and increasing their profits by exploiting low-wage labor abroad.
I believe that most Americans can pay lower taxes if hedge fund managers who make billions manipulating the marketplace finally start paying the taxes that they should.
I don't believe in special treatment for the top 1 percent, but I do believe in equal treatment for African Americans who are right to proclaim the moral principle that Black Lives Matter.
I despise appeals to nativism and prejudice of which we have been hearing a lot in recent months, and I do believe in immigration reform that gives Hispanics and others a pathway to citizenship and a better life.
"I am disturbed by some of what I am hearing from my Republican colleagues, and I will just say this: During these difficult times, as Americans we will not succumb to racism," he said. "We will not allow ourselves to be divided and succumb to Islamophobia. We will not turn our backs on the refugees."
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)*just like his stump speech*
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)The terms socialism and socialist poll very very badly. In the real world, real campaigns and real political operations conduct something that is called polling. Polling helps real campaigns refine their message and avoid traps. I know that the Sanders campaign considers polling to be a waste of time and money which worries me as to whether Sanders is a viable candidate. DWS is well aware of this polling
.
From Pew http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/little-change-in-publics-response-to-capitalism-socialism/
By contrast, socialism is a far more divisive word, with wide differences of opinion along racial, generational, socioeconomic and political lines. Fully nine-in-ten conservative Republicans (90%) view socialism negatively, while nearly six-in-ten liberal Democrats (59%) react positively. Low-income Americans are twice as likely as higher-income Americans to offer a positive assessment of socialism (43% among those with incomes under $30,000, 22% among those earning $75,000 or more).
From Gallop http://www.gallup.com/poll/125645/Socialism-Viewed-Positively-Americans.aspx
....Socialism
Socialism had the lowest percentage positive rating and the highest negative rating of any term tested. Still, more than a third of Americans say they have a positive image of socialism.
Exactly how Americans define "socialism" or what exactly they think of when they hear the word is not known. The research simply measures Americans' reactions when a survey interviewer reads the word to them -- an exercise that helps shed light on connotations associated with this frequently used term.
There are significant differences in reactions to "socialism" across ideological and partisan groups:
A majority of 53% of Democrats have a positive image of socialism, compared to 17% of Republicans.
Sixty-one percent of liberals say their image of socialism is positive, compared to 39% of moderates and 20% of conservatives
It will take a great deal more than one speech not carried by national media to change these views. Sanders would have to engage in a massive advertising and educational campaign to erase these type of polling numbers.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)http://www.gallup.com/poll/11770/eternal-destinations-americans-believe-heaven-hell.aspx
SO.... Based on the polls
there IS a HELL and the DEVIL is real.
Efff polls
coyote
(1,561 posts)Lol
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)An article from 2010 and another from 2012. What we pull out some Hillary polls from 2007 to complete the history lesson?
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)Here is a recent article https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/10/12/why-bernie-sanders-isnt-going-to-be-president-in-5-words/
Sanders has been known as a democratic socialist for decades. This didnt matter much to Kiley or York, or to most other Sanders supporters I met during the next few weeks; mainly, they were impressed that he hadnt shed the term. York thought that, because of Sanders and his social-media-driven fans, socialism was getting a bit of a P.R. makeover. She noted that sites like Reddit and Twitter were circulating videos of Bernie explaining why he identifies as a socialist, and what it means to him, in a really positive light. She added, The word had a retro connection to Communism and was originally thrown at him as a damning label by his opponents. But for his supporters it isnt a deterrent.
But even in that Internet survey and even among millennials, the group most inclined to see socialism favorably, capitalism is still preferred by more people. And, people who are drawn to Sanders at least so far aren't even a majority of Democrats, much less the entire country.
The simple political fact is that if Sanders did ever manage to win the Democratic presidential nomination a long shot but far from a no shot at this point Republicans would simply clip Sanders's answer to Todd above and put it in a 30-second TV ad. That would, almost certainly, be the end of Sanders's viability in a general election.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... but not every criticism of Bernie can be so easily dismissed by characterizing it as a meme. This criticism appears to be pretty accurate.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Is that a "meme" too?
Verbatim?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I cannot keep track of them all.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Perfect. lol.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)Bernie never changes, I can see how YOU would get bored.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)The lecturing us like we are bad children. The history lessons that we already know.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)And, he doesn't change his accent in every region he visits.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)EOM
treestar
(82,383 posts)with most of his supporters here. Private companies? Corporations?
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Remember when Hillary speechified
in the same hall?
Looks like A LOT of people
moved on with their lives...
even before Hillary started talking
bravenak
(34,648 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)We shouldn't pick on Charlie right now.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)It's a state of cognitive dissnance
where despite evidence to the
contrary poeple continue to cling
to easily disprovable ideas.
Hillary isn't *winning* anything,
but as a marginal lead in a few polls.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)kbaithnx
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)John Poet
(2,510 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)You can't be a real winner without that!
bravenak
(34,648 posts)That was funny.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Skidmore
(37,364 posts)international policy with the knowledge and depth that she did.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Also, I can't imagine Bernie advocating
continued destabilization of the middle east
in places like, Egypt, Libya, and Syria
like Hillary continues to do.
So there's that.
She may have *information*
but she lacks foresight and judgement.
She's not presidential material.
Apologizing after promoting a war
exemplifies horrifyingly bad judgement.
Response to Cosmic Kitten (Reply #35)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Cha
(297,323 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)He's the only politician candidate I've heard who talks openly about the overthrow of Iranian democracy by the CIA in the 50's and the other regime changes that have led to stability. To me that shows he understands much better than the others where our problems have come from.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)I'm beginning to think they don't exist in such numbers as we are told. These polls are seriously wrong.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)They don't mix with the unwashed mass of humanity
Cha
(297,323 posts)brooklynite
(94,598 posts)Care to show us a crowd with Bernie Sanders in 2014?
reformist2
(9,841 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)He started with FDR then switched to today. Basically saying we need to do what FDR did. That's what we said in 2009.
I think all three candidates are saying similar things. I wanted to hear how he was going to get it done but I didn't hear that. Maybe he said it later.
FDR had a favorable Congress I think. He was challenged in the Supreme Court and lost. The NRA was unconstitutional I think.
He tried to pack the courts but lost.
He put troops in place of I union workers during a railroad strike.
The country was isolationist but FDR wasn't
Bernie would never be a new FDR.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It was very FDR invoking but did not resonate with me.
Trying to force a 21st century world into a 1930s model.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)..same sized pants cuz I was convinced things hadn't changed that much.
They did!
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I'd like to read it.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)More people will read the headlines. It's not a campaign move of someone trying to win.
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Imo
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)That was also someone who wasn't trying to win, right?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)The comparison is laughable at best.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)At that time there was a very strong argument that a Catholic couldn't be president because they would be controlled by the pope. He gave a speech purposely to convince America that a label was no reason to prevent an American from entering the White House. The similarity is striking.
Response to Kentonio (Reply #113)
Name removed Message auto-removed
riversedge
(70,242 posts)tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)if people can't digest an idea in 140 characters it's too much work
bravenak
(34,648 posts)DianeK
(975 posts)there is no point to this thread but to provoke another pointless conflict between those who suppoert Hillary and those who support Bernie
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Are you expecting more or better
Don't get your hopes up
bravenak
(34,648 posts)you seem terrified
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It's a member of DU sharing an opinion.
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)The polling shows that the negative beliefs as to the terms "socialism" and "socialist" are deeply held and will not be easily changed without an extensive education effort. One speech not carried by the national media is not going to accomplish anything.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Changes of magnitude take alot of time in this nation. I agree, I do not see this changing anything at all.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)The whole debacle is a joke & I'm sick of listening to my son bitch about HRC's commercial's on YouTube. But at least he knows who she is & that Trump is a racist douche. I ask him about BS he just calls him the cranky old guy.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It makes some people money to keep things going so long, imo.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)between 2014 & 2016. I really don't know why people discuss the debates like it's not a bunch of zookeepers just throwing exactly what the sharks below want to be fed. It's just another dumb reality show really.
One debate in both the primary in general, 15 min, each subject on c-span moderdated by the SCOTUS. Make election day a federal holiday where everyone has to vote but there is a D. None of the above box & call it a day.
There problem solved. It would save on cost & annoyance.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)This shit is just a circus and the dems get to be the adults who keep the elephants from attacking the crowd. There will not be a revolution.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Because last I checked, that also required a revolution in the minds and hearts of America to change behaviors, laws and mindsets to create real positive change.
But should we believe that a revolution in racial equality is perfectly possible but a revolution in economic equality is just some naive pipe-dream? When did it become a bad thing to want to improve things?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)It just seems strange that you can believe in one equality movement but decry another as unrealistic. Why can't we have progress in all areas?
karynnj
(59,504 posts)annoying. I still wonder how she and several Republicans really think that a no fly zone to stop Assad from bombing people can be done. The fact is that he is NOT bombing the people on the Turkish border - his focus is on the rebels in places like Homs and elsewhere. Not to mention, the Russians are there flying as well. Do we really want to challenge Russian and Syrian planes flying in Syria? Not to mention --- that is NOT fighting ISIS. Just my opinion.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)Ill watch this weekend,
bravenak
(34,648 posts)No yelling.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Cute.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,828 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Piedras
(247 posts)I watched the entire speech and thought it was brilliant. Bernie thoughtfully expanded on his typical stump speech. It was much longer and filled in gaps like how help to pay for college for everyone, not just for public colleges and universities. I liked how he built up from Black Lives Matter to include Hispanics, immigration reform, and sheltering Syrian refugees. He had time to offer more solutions to problems. My support for Bernie Sanders is strengthened after watching the speech. He received enthusiastic applause many times during the speech from the students.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)It was all full of boring "issues" and "policies" and stuff.
Who cares?
Yawn.
Nothing to see there.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)I DID however watch Bernie's excellent speech, and am actually looking forward to watching it again. I like inspiring stuff.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)into the political arena, but then, I am sure,
that this would be of no interest to you.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)sadden him. I found the whole anti blm thing to be a perfect example of what you describe.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)...what with being a United States Senator, running for president, missing very few Senate votes, and introducing new legislation and amendments.
He might be a tad busy.
edit: if i was going to be really mean I'd say that the meme that he isn't really a democrat would mean he shouldn't even visit this board.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)while having his name plastered on their posts. I did not just mean here. I have a couple of letters of harassment that say Go Bernie!, that might make him decide that there are reasons he is not getting traction. Twitter. Facebook. News comments sections. All the black publications comment sections. Various places. He should look. Be a leader. Be an executive. Keep everyone in line. Otherwise, I do not feel confident that he will look in the future if he won't look now.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)When the exciting 'moderate' Hillary made a speech at Georgetown U, the hall was 3/4 empty.
They started lining up at 5 am for Bernie's 1 pm speech. America is sick and tired of corporate.
Cha
(297,323 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)We want political gamesmanship instead!
Cha
(297,323 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)4/5 empty. Apparently the exciting world of 'Moderate' (whatever that is) doesn't pack em in.
I highly doubt you have ever watched a whole Sanders speech.
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)supporters do other things with their time.
Please keep dreaming that HRC doesn't have massively more support than Bernie.
And that her supporters are all party elites.
She's winning. Deal with reality.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Response to bravenak (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Cha
(297,323 posts)I can understand that because the more I learn the less I like him.
Response to Cha (Reply #96)
Name removed Message auto-removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)and then be turned off so much by the way too many of them abused #BLM activists, that it would turn anyone against Bernie himself.
Well, I saw it happen. They're campaigning for Bernie in his name all over the net and they aren't doing him any favors. And, Surprise.. It's not really important if they believe it or not .. just more denial for them.
If someone is running for office.. they better make damn sure they have people representing them, who will make a good case for their candidate without attacking anyone.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)your policies, platforms, opinions and speeches for you.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)instead of posting anti-Sanders OPs?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)As you know I'm a nerd. Haven't watched Hillary's speech yet, have you?
And also, just thought I'd mention that you post in a conversational manner that I enjoy. It's like we're in a living room hanging out talking. The passive-aggressive or hostile posts toward you are bizarre & hilarious. I have no idea where some of these folks are coming from. Maybe they're upset or still in denial that their candidate has barely a five percent chance of winning the nomination. And that's if Hillary dies or drops out of the race. Even then, I think O'Malley would jump up in the polls. This disconnect is so strange to me. Ah well, dirt off your shoulder. I wish we had an emoji for that, lol.
coyote
(1,561 posts)found Bernie's speech boring. Can't talk about the issues because you have nothing to stand on, but will smear Bernie instead.
Cha
(297,323 posts)JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)I can't understand why anyone believes anything you say, particularly about Bernie.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Of Rubio giving a SOTU response.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I'm completely aware that these are the characteristics that his followers find to be "endearing" about him, but it's a complete turn-off for me.
Such behavior on the world stage will work against him. Rather than cooperation from allies and adversaries, his confrontational "style" and demeanor is likely to be met with an equal amount of resistance. He's no diplomat.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Was out all day living.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)they both had something to say and said it. I actually read both speeches...definitely the way to go in my opinion
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)I gotta say you are the best " former Sanders supporter turned to Hillary because.....supporters" of the lot.
Someone should trademark that
LettuceSea
(337 posts)To HRCs credit, she's going after the bigger voting pool.
Besides a few outliers, Bernie's supporters are far more verbose on this site compared to HRC supporters. Interesting pattern...