2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDem debate drew smallest audience of the primary season thus far...
A Democratic Party presidential debate on CBS drew the smallest audience thus far among the series of primary debates not much surprise given its Saturday-night slot. It scored a 1.5 rating in adults 18-49 and 7.22 million viewers. By comparison, the first Democratic debate on CNN in October brought in a 3.4 rating and more than 15 million viewers.
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2015/11/15/tv-ratings-saturday-nov-14-2015/
still it got more viewers than any other program on primetime last night.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Those are really low numbers.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)That's a horrible time.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)Wanted to see that
PatrickforO
(14,587 posts)during football season. 7.22 million is really good for a Saturday night, but the Fox Business debate with the GOP drew 13.5 million viewers.
So nothing new here, just more disgust with Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Wasserman-Schultz should be held accountable for this,but that is not going to happen. And so it goes.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)regrets agreeing to so few? and at such awkward days.
think
(11,641 posts)PatrickforO
(14,587 posts)Probably because Sanders wants to focus with single minded intensity on issues. Though O'Malley was a bit obnoxious - but he had to be that way to get any movement at all.
askew
(1,464 posts)Her team is desperately trying to clean-up her 9/11 Wall Street quote this morning and it isn't working. And most telling, Hillary only appeared onstage at her post-debate party for 3 minutes and only mentioned the debate once. Compared to her post-debate party in Nevada where she gave a long speech and talked about how well the debate went.
I think O'Malley was the clear winner even with the moderator not allowing him to talk. He had the two most memorable moments of the night - his impassioned defense of immigration and calling out Donald Trump as a carnival barker and his saying that soldiers aren't "boots on the ground". Both, were emotional moments that got huge applause.
The other memorable moment was Hillary's 9/11 Wall Street gaffe. I don't think there is any way to clean that one up.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)real debate is all about and more Americans welcome debate versus clown shows than the mass media will ever tell you.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)scheduled when people will actually WATCH them, as the GOP is doing?
Because they are political cowards. That's why. It's as bad as republicans not wanting minorities to be able to vote. They know Hillary's only chance of winning is name recognition. Her record doesn't stand up to scrutiny. We saw that last night.
Political cowardness.
frylock
(34,825 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)askew
(1,464 posts)Expect debates to continue small audiences as next two are on weekends as well.
Sanders made a mistake in not agreeing to do debates outside the DNC sanctioned ones. O'Malley tried to get him to come onboard for them and now when he needs the media exposure, he won't get it.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Hillary is a known quantity. Everybody already knows her.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)You should be very concerned for your candidate because this isn't helping her either
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)CaptainTruth
(6,601 posts)I looked at the link & didn't see anything about streaming/Internet viewers being included in the total.
Maybe I missed it? Maybe they weren't included?
I watched online.
DWS, the DNC and HRC have put a bad taste in my mouth. Small debate schedule...hiding the debates in bad time slots (freaking NFL playoff Sunday for the Feb debate). Im this close to not voting next fall if Hillary wins.
I have my reservations about some of her political positions and flip flops...but this sort of rigging and outright ignoring of what democrat voters want pisses me off. We want more debates, and we want people to view the debates.
I cannot support a candidate when deep down in my core I feel like the primary is being fixed. I cannot support that sort of "democracy".
And trust me, Im not alone in my sentiment. The DNC better get their act together.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Bernie
Because fuck this shit!
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Lochloosa
(16,068 posts)R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)That folks accusing the Dem party of trying to "fix" the debates so that Hillary is the nominee aren't facing reality. I HOPE (and this is where I could be wrong) that the Dem leadership wants the nominee to be the one who has the best chance of winning the general, be that Hillary, O'Malley or Sanders. That's what I'd like - at this point I'm probably in the O'Malley camp but I doubt he's going to be the nominee and I'll support Sanders or Hillary over any Republican, especially that "carnival barker" Trump.