Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:01 PM Nov 2015

This is totally off the wall - but listening to a clip of HRC on NPR this morning made me wonder:

has anyone ever done a study about the timbre and auditory frequency of the speaking voices of presidential campaign winners? What I mean is, is there a measurable range of vocal frequencies that electoral winners exhibit?

This would have nothing to do with the content of what any candidate has to say, this would be simply be about how the sound of their voices reaches the voters' ears.

I ask because I have never liked the sound of HRC's voice. I find it grating and unpleasant, and this has been the case throughout her tenure as Secretary of State - not just her present and former candidacies.

I will vote for her if she is the Democratic nominee, but not particularly because I like her - because I never have. And I think that one of reasons I've never liked her is because of the way her voice grates on my ears - never mind her policy positions.

How much does just the sound of a candidate's voice influence voters? When I read about polls giving Ben Carson high favorability among Republican voters it makes me wonder how much just the soothing, pleasant sound of his voice accounts for that favorability?

I think we know that how people vote often has nothing to do with rational thought but is instead predicated on all sorts of unconscious and irrational factors. Is the sound of someone's voice one of those unconscious and irrational factors?

59 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is totally off the wall - but listening to a clip of HRC on NPR this morning made me wonder: (Original Post) scarletwoman Nov 2015 OP
Oh, great question! HerbChestnut Nov 2015 #1
Thank you. I appreciate that you "get" what I'm talking about! nt scarletwoman Nov 2015 #3
I've wondered the same. Throughout eons it seems voices have been used to stir RKP5637 Nov 2015 #2
Thanks! I'd love to see an osilliscope hooked up to recordings of every president for which scarletwoman Nov 2015 #6
It's easy to do with a PC and spectrum analyzer software Fumesucker Nov 2015 #56
Ben Carson's voice is soothing, until you process the words. Hoyt Nov 2015 #4
I have to agree with that... Hepburn Nov 2015 #5
The thing is - what if people don't process the words? scarletwoman Nov 2015 #9
Yep, it's sort of hypnotic. Then, you wake up and say WTF!!! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2015 #11
usually if someone doesn't like someone they can find anything to use to justify that. boston bean Nov 2015 #7
I understand that you think this may be some sort of back door anti-female criticism, but it's not. scarletwoman Nov 2015 #13
It's a well known sexist trope. I don't know how much more nicely to put it. boston bean Nov 2015 #14
Actually, it's not. I could listen to Elizabeth Warren's voice all day long. reformist2 Nov 2015 #16
No, it is a sexist trope. I don't care whose voice you could listen to all day long. boston bean Nov 2015 #17
So how do you explain the "dulcet" sounds of Dubya or Cheney? flor-de-jasmim Nov 2015 #19
I don't explain them at all. boston bean Nov 2015 #20
No, some female AND male voices are grating. Sarah Palin's voice is like tblue37 Nov 2015 #24
Two Words -- Michelle Obama Armstead Nov 2015 #40
That you make a distinction based on the sound of someone's voice boston bean Nov 2015 #45
Did you read the damn OP? That's what the subject is Armstead Nov 2015 #47
I did read the damn OP, as you put it. boston bean Nov 2015 #48
And so have I, so let's just leave it at that Armstead Nov 2015 #53
If that's what you think then I think you are not getting what I'm talking about. scarletwoman Nov 2015 #21
It is what I think and I think it is a sexist trope that's been around for a real long time. boston bean Nov 2015 #25
re: "What is the first woman president of the United States voice suppose to sound like?" thesquanderer Nov 2015 #32
Warren's voice grates on many people's nerves - too pedantic. nt Persondem Nov 2015 #39
Everything can be considred a well-known sexist trope if you choose it to be Armstead Nov 2015 #38
Some things are. Just because some believe, as you do, that boston bean Nov 2015 #41
Not a whole lot of logic in that statement Armstead Nov 2015 #42
made perfect logical sense to me in regards to what I was responding to. boston bean Nov 2015 #44
Think of male politicians whose voices you find annoying...To me, Ted Cruze for example Armstead Nov 2015 #46
So? I have described to you a common sexist trope. boston bean Nov 2015 #50
People are relatively shallow... msrizzo Nov 2015 #57
She sounds like Charlie Brown's teacher to me tularetom Nov 2015 #8
I do agree, it often sounds like she is speaking down to her subjects from her throne. RKP5637 Nov 2015 #10
Interesting post. And since you brought it up … NurseJackie Nov 2015 #12
I get it. As the *sound* of his voice goes, it's not particularly attractive, either. scarletwoman Nov 2015 #15
Sounds about right! sorechasm Nov 2015 #18
Wow! I love your point about grade school children! scarletwoman Nov 2015 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Nov 2015 #22
Hard to find stuff about influencing others with your voice. Just about every thing LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #23
Thank you! That's very interesting. scarletwoman Nov 2015 #27
I read somewhere that Rebkeh Nov 2015 #28
Thank you! I appreciate your post. scarletwoman Nov 2015 #29
I read once that a person does not start out to be a conman, it is just that as they grow up LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #31
There is a great deal of study about such things, but none of it works the way you think it does... Bluenorthwest Nov 2015 #30
Fair point. However, what I'm really wondering about is if there is measurable auditory frequency scarletwoman Nov 2015 #33
Well there is, but those voices would all sound very different from one another and the similarity Bluenorthwest Nov 2015 #52
Except what I'm thinking of is whether there might be some way of electronically measuring voices. scarletwoman Nov 2015 #54
Consider height Rebkeh Nov 2015 #58
Interesting. I find Bernie Sanders voice and demeanor abrasive. Whether he is hard of hearing, or livetohike Nov 2015 #34
After watching last night's debate, I also began to worry about how those MBS Nov 2015 #35
Barney Frank has a speech impediment. There's a lot that goes into sufrommich Nov 2015 #36
True but Rebkeh Nov 2015 #37
I don't think so,Frank has had the impediment sufrommich Nov 2015 #49
Good to know n/t Rebkeh Nov 2015 #59
Nixon - Kennedy Debates Armstead Nov 2015 #43
Yes, that's interesting. scarletwoman Nov 2015 #51
I think you have a valid point. There are newscasters I can't stand shraby Nov 2015 #55
 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
1. Oh, great question!
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:03 PM
Nov 2015

I don't have an answer for you, but I'm just as curious. My hunch is that you're right.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
2. I've wondered the same. Throughout eons it seems voices have been used to stir
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:06 PM
Nov 2015

emotions. The correlation of voices to presidential campaign winners would be an interesting study.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
6. Thanks! I'd love to see an osilliscope hooked up to recordings of every president for which
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:11 PM
Nov 2015

recordiings are available, and see if there's a particular frequency range within they all fall.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
9. The thing is - what if people don't process the words?
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:13 PM
Nov 2015

What if just the sound of the voice is the main influence?

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
7. usually if someone doesn't like someone they can find anything to use to justify that.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:12 PM
Nov 2015

We have never had a female president and to be quite frank with you, this type of criticism is firmly rooted in our sexist culture. sad to see this being posted here.

So, it is not totally off the wall, it's not something women who are climbing the ladder have heard throughout the ages.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
13. I understand that you think this may be some sort of back door anti-female criticism, but it's not.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:21 PM
Nov 2015

There are plenty of female voices that don't grate on my ears. Hillary's voice does, I can't help it. I'll still vote for her if she's the Democratic nominee.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
16. Actually, it's not. I could listen to Elizabeth Warren's voice all day long.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:27 PM
Nov 2015

Hillary's voice is a little grating.

tblue37

(65,487 posts)
24. No, some female AND male voices are grating. Sarah Palin's voice is like
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:48 PM
Nov 2015

fingernails on a blackboard. Although I like comedian David Spade, I think his nasal, snarky voice would turn off people in any situation in which people wanted to hear maturity, responsibility, or power.

I never could stand the snickering, snarky sound of BabyBush's voice, but Jeb's voice actually has a fairly pleasant, calming sound. Of course, the John Birch Republicans don't *want* calm and rational sounding leaders, and the evangelicals who like Carson don't like Bush's position, his brother's contamination, and his wishy-washy words and demeanor, though Carson's soothing voice is married to words and ideas that *do* appeal to them.

The John Birch wing of the R Party probably responds to the bombastic sound of Trump's voice the same way Hitler's crowds responded to the tone and cadence of his demogoguery. They also like Fiorina's aggressive tone and demeanor.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
40. Two Words -- Michelle Obama
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:53 PM
Nov 2015

She is a perfect speaker and...if you want to talk presidential...she is both very strong and no-nonsense, and capable of expressing anger clearly, but also very personable, pleasant and humorous. And most important REAL.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
45. That you make a distinction based on the sound of someone's voice
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:01 PM
Nov 2015

as most important is rather telling.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
48. I did read the damn OP, as you put it.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:05 PM
Nov 2015

And I have given my opinion, based entirely on the OP's words and responses to me.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
21. If that's what you think then I think you are not getting what I'm talking about.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:42 PM
Nov 2015

The timbre and frequency of a speaking voice surely ought to be measurable - and the attractiveness or non-attractiveness of certain frequencies would therefore be measurable as well, whether the speaker is female or male.

Why does Siri have a female voice? The human ear seems to generally find female voices attractive and comforting.

Finding HRC's voice unpleasant to listen to has nothing to do with female voices in general, it has only to do with the one individual voice.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
25. It is what I think and I think it is a sexist trope that's been around for a real long time.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:52 PM
Nov 2015

What is the first woman president of the United States voice suppose to sound like?

thesquanderer

(11,991 posts)
32. re: "What is the first woman president of the United States voice suppose to sound like?"
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:26 PM
Nov 2015

Possibly something like this...

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
38. Everything can be considred a well-known sexist trope if you choose it to be
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:48 PM
Nov 2015

The same measurement applies to men as well as women.....and vice versa.

boston bean

(36,223 posts)
41. Some things are. Just because some believe, as you do, that
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:53 PM
Nov 2015

everything can be one, therefore nothing really is one, is not indicative of it not being a sexist trope.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
46. Think of male politicians whose voices you find annoying...To me, Ted Cruze for example
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:03 PM
Nov 2015

He alternates between sounding whiny and phony and sanctimonious. Even if I agreed with him on anything, that voice and inflection would drive me crazy. Last I heard, he is a male.



boston bean

(36,223 posts)
50. So? I have described to you a common sexist trope.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:07 PM
Nov 2015

That womens voices are whiny, angry, shrill etc. These things have been used against an entire group, not just one individual woman.

So pointing this out is not something I made up or that isn't true.

msrizzo

(796 posts)
57. People are relatively shallow...
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:29 PM
Nov 2015

So what you say could have some bearing. My husband didn't like Hillary's voice until he heard Sander's speak and he dislikes his voice even more to the point where he has trouble listening to him. We have no silver throated candidates this time around, and our sitting president is one of the easiest people to listen to, so the bar is pretty high.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
8. She sounds like Charlie Brown's teacher to me
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:13 PM
Nov 2015


I don't like what she says, but she seems to be talking down to her audience. Her tone is condescending and dismissive and her inflection is harsh. Even when she affects her bogus southern accent

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
10. I do agree, it often sounds like she is speaking down to her subjects from her throne.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:16 PM
Nov 2015

That said, I like all three democratic candidates for various reasons. Of all of them, I think Bernie is the most down to earth.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
12. Interesting post. And since you brought it up …
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:18 PM
Nov 2015

… I find it difficult to listen to Bernie speak. He's got an abrupt style that reminds me of an angry and gravelly Regis Philbin. Perhaps such things are unfair criticisms, but I find it to be distracting and annoying. I think he'd be awkward and out of place on the world stage, and that would be a disadvantage.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
15. I get it. As the *sound* of his voice goes, it's not particularly attractive, either.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:26 PM
Nov 2015

I can appreciate many of his positions, but I'm not convinced that he'd be an effective president.

sorechasm

(631 posts)
18. Sounds about right!
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:32 PM
Nov 2015

Would be a great study. It would explain why grade school children are generally better at picking Presidential election winners than the rest of us. They like story teller's voices. May also explain the Ben Carson appeal.

Regarding HRC's voice and her delivery, my wife and I agree 100%. Her voice is about as inspirational as desert sand.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
26. Wow! I love your point about grade school children!
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:53 PM
Nov 2015

Yes, the "story teller's" voice! That totally explains Reagan, for sure!

Thank you for getting what I'm saying - I'd love to see a study like that!

Response to scarletwoman (Original post)

LiberalArkie

(15,728 posts)
23. Hard to find stuff about influencing others with your voice. Just about every thing
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:43 PM
Nov 2015

says how to do it, not which voice type influence others. But that being said I did find this.

http://www.impactcommunicationsinc.com/telephone-communication-skills/your-tone-of-voice-affects-how-people-respond-to-you/

Practice speaking at a slightly lower octave. Deeper voices have more credibility than higher pitched voices. It will take getting used to pitching your voice down an octave, but it will be worth the effort. It is also what on-air radio personalities have had to learn to do.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
27. Thank you! That's very interesting.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:58 PM
Nov 2015

One thing I've been thinking about is how people train to be opera singers - where in their body their voice needs to come from.

When I hear Hillary speak, her voice sounds like it comes from no lower than her throat. A good singer's voice comes from their belly - Hillary's voice never gets that far down.

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
28. I read somewhere that
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:05 PM
Nov 2015

Female voices tend to trigger or be processed in the emotional processing sections of the brain, especially for men. Likewise, male voices process more 'logically'. The claim was that female voices are filtered emotionally and this tends to not sit well with our culture's standards of authoritative speech.

If there's any truth to this claim, and I'm not convinced there is, it's got to be strictly cultural.

As for Hillary's voice, I'm hard of hearing so I hear it differently than most, and I too find it kind of unsettling and annoying. Especially her laugh, it sounds/feels insincere.

Bernie's voice has a grating quality but it's warm -like a grumpy but endearing grandfather.

MOM sounds like a salesman, which is off putting too.

Elizabeth Warren sounds like a beloved professor. So does Barack Obama, actually.

Interesting OP, giving me food for thought.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
29. Thank you! I appreciate your post.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:16 PM
Nov 2015

This is interesting, if true:

Female voices tend to trigger or be processed in the emotional processing sections of the brain, especially for men. Likewise, male voices process more 'logically'. The claim was that female voices are filtered emotionally and this tends to not sit well with our culture's standards of authoritative speech.

I agree with you, that if it's true, it's "cultural".

Your post has also given me food for thought - thank you!

LiberalArkie

(15,728 posts)
31. I read once that a person does not start out to be a conman, it is just that as they grow up
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:22 PM
Nov 2015

people always believe them. So there has to be something in the voice that makes people believe in someone just by listening to them. And I say voice because before TV was radio and outdoor speeches and sermons that caused people to fork over a lot of money.

For some reason Obama turns me off when he is speaking because I feel his is talking down to me, but only when I am watching him. I can just listen and not watch him and I am fine. He just seems to project an "air of superiority".

Bernie indeed presents the "grandfather" image.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
30. There is a great deal of study about such things, but none of it works the way you think it does...
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:20 PM
Nov 2015

Missing key to your vocal theory is that it is a two part process, the speaker and the listener, the physical bodies of each, the mental state of each. There are reasons that one person likes the sound of a voice while others do not. Those reasons tend to lie in the listener.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
33. Fair point. However, what I'm really wondering about is if there is measurable auditory frequency
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:26 PM
Nov 2015

that winners of presidential elections have in common. Is there a specific, measurable range of vocal timbre and tone that seems to be generally more attractive to the human ear?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
52. Well there is, but those voices would all sound very different from one another and the similarity
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:07 PM
Nov 2015

would not be discerned by the casual listener nor predicted by the nature of the other voices. Voices that have those attractive qualities sound very different from one another, and no voice is perceived by all listeners in the same way.
I think what I am not saying clearly is that it is a physical process and a body experience, similar to taste or smell. Our likes and dislikes are simply the way our bodies and minds respond to say, broccoli. I can't stand the smell, I have friends who breath it in, yummmmmmm. We are both correct about the smell of broccoli. Our opinions are based on our bodies, not on the smell itself but on the smell in us.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
54. Except what I'm thinking of is whether there might be some way of electronically measuring voices.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:17 PM
Nov 2015

Like, picking up radio waves or something. Obviously the human ear is a completely subjective measurement. But surely there are machines that can measure tone and pitch, etc - just as decibels can be measured.

Anyway, that's what I'm trying to get at - not how people hear something, but how a machine of some sort might measure it.

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
58. Consider height
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 03:45 PM
Nov 2015

Studies have shown taller men have a distinct advantage to win, that's less about individual perception than most would think.

If voices follow a similar pattern is a legitimate question.

livetohike

(22,163 posts)
34. Interesting. I find Bernie Sanders voice and demeanor abrasive. Whether he is hard of hearing, or
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:31 PM
Nov 2015

thinks he needs to talk loudly to make his point, it is extremely annoying. He seems constantly on the edge of throwing a tantrum.

MBS

(9,688 posts)
35. After watching last night's debate, I also began to worry about how those
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:37 PM
Nov 2015

nebulous (and, yes, irrational) qualities -- add to the voice issue the emphatic, angry finger-pointing as well as the defensive tone that I also witnessed last night-- will play in the general election.

Fair or not, voters make judgment on these things.
I personally did not feel that HRC "won" the debate last night.
Nor (IMHO) did any other individual candidate, each of whom had both high and low moments.

The Democratic Party did come off well, though, in presenting -- and in stark contrast to the Republican circus - 3 candidates of substance and experience.


sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
36. Barney Frank has a speech impediment. There's a lot that goes into
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:41 PM
Nov 2015

a successful politician,their voice is the least of it.

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
37. True but
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:48 PM
Nov 2015

In Barnie Frank's case, I'm told he sounds like someone talking without his dentures in. As a lip reader myself, I don't think I've ever seen any teeth so that would make sense.

Funny because Barnie Frank to me sounds abrasive but in a warm, endearing way.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
43. Nixon - Kennedy Debates
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:58 PM
Nov 2015

Supposedly those who heard them of radio thought Nixon did better. Those who saw them on TV thought Kennedy did better.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
51. Yes, that's interesting.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:07 PM
Nov 2015

Actually, Nixon had a very good voice, just yesterday I heard a clip of him speaking. Kennedy's voice was sort of nasal and not as deeply pitched as Nixon's. I can see why radio listeners would favor Nixon, just going by the comparative sound quality of the voices.

shraby

(21,946 posts)
55. I think you have a valid point. There are newscasters I can't stand
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:28 PM
Nov 2015

to listen to. Their voice seems to go on and on and becomes extremely irritating, no matter what they are saying. Like Mr. Shraby says, "when are they going to shut up?"
I find in my case at least, the higher pitched female voices are the most abrasive. Probably why I don't find the male voices as irritating for the most part.
I agree, Cruz has a whiny voice and that one grates on the nerves. Don't like that kind of male voice.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»This is totally off the w...