Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:23 AM Nov 2015

Winners and Losers from the the Second Presidential Democratic Debate (Washington Post)

Oh dear Hillary was the loser!

Losers
* Hillary Clinton: No, the former secretary of state wasn't bad. In fact, she was quite good for much of the debate. The problem was that Clinton made a few verbal and/or policy mistakes that will likely haunt her in the days to come. The biggest was her attempt to downplay the number of donations she receives from Wall Street by citing the work she did to help rebuild the financial sector of New York City following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. That's, um, not a very good response


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/11/14/winners-and-losers-from-the-second-democratic-presidential-debate/?tid=pm_politics_pop_b

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Winners and Losers from the the Second Presidential Democratic Debate (Washington Post) (Original Post) Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2015 OP
Bernie's opening remarks were terrible. Kalidurga Nov 2015 #1
They mentioned that as another Loser tammywammy Nov 2015 #2
Yes he earned that mark. Kalidurga Nov 2015 #3
Holy cripes top O'Malley staffer smacked down Hillary Clinton on Twitter Cheese Sandwich Nov 2015 #4

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
1. Bernie's opening remarks were terrible.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:28 AM
Nov 2015

I seriously cringed. I am not by far the only one. But, then he proceeded to dominate the debate like nothing I have ever seen before. I almost forgot about the stinker at the beginning of the debate. I have a better idea how he will handle foreign policy now and I am all in favor of making this more of a thing where we spend more than 10% MIC budget to fight terrorism. That was the winning foreign policy position IMO.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
2. They mentioned that as another Loser
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:35 AM
Nov 2015
Foreign policy Bernie Sanders: Sanders knew that the first question in the debate was going to be about the attacks in Paris — and what America should be saying and doing about them. And yet, he simply offered condolences to the people of France before moving on to his standard stump speech excoriating the "millionaires and billionaires." It felt very off. Sanders regained his footing somewhat when the topic turned to the vote on the Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) in Iraq (he opposed it, Clinton supported it). But, the moment had passed, and Sanders had swung and missed at a chance to show that he could be a statesman as opposed to simply a domestic policy revolutionary.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
3. Yes he earned that mark.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 02:37 AM
Nov 2015

But, he also earned being the overall big winner. I won't shy away from that assessment it wasn't just me either 30 other people deeply inhaled when he made his opening remarks, this was in real time.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
4. Holy cripes top O'Malley staffer smacked down Hillary Clinton on Twitter
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 03:08 AM
Nov 2015
Lis Smith ?@Lis_Smith

My dad worked in WTC from the day it was built to the day it went down. @HillaryClinton, never invoke 9/11 to justify your Wall St positions
https://twitter.com/Lis_Smith/status/665727911085797376

Lis Smith ?@Lis_Smith

Deeply, deeply offensive to families--including mine--that were forever changed by that tragedy.
https://twitter.com/Lis_Smith/status/665731029936685056
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Winners and Losers from t...