2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumit was his fucking STAFFER, people!!
please, stop this nonsense about how bernie "got upset" about this being a foreign policy debate. its total bullshit and y'all know it. an overworked and stressed staffer may have made a snark about a schedule change. this has zero to do with bernie or his suitability for the office.
if your candidate is worthy and solid, you don't need to trot out slanderous bullshit to make a case for him or her.
so cut it out. it just makes people look petty and underconfident about their candidate
have a nice evening
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I can only imagine the posts we'd see in GDPee.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)that we're allowed to ask Hillary?
Can't leave everything to your imagination.
mcar
(42,372 posts)thucythucy
(8,086 posts)Campaigns are pressure cookers. Even my own limited experience was more stress than I could handle at times. Lack of sleep is a big factor, the constant traveling, the crap food diet---unless campaigns are hugely different now from when I was involved (and yes, it was a LONG time ago) it seems the occasional meltdown is to be expected.
I'm sure there are supporters of Secretary Clinton who have and will say some things that cross the line. This doesn't necessarily reflect on the candidate. My only exceptions to that would be a staffer who makes an obvious racist, sexist, homophobic or ableist statement which is tolerated by the campaign, or breaks a law or clearly violates widely accepted ethical standards, which aren't repudiated by the campaign and/or the candidate.
But the occasional stressed out meltdown? Let's cut these folks some slack. They're living the campaign 24-7--it's perhaps the most important thing in their lives at this moment, and though there's no harm in calling them out for an obvious gaffe, let's not let the contest between these two fine candidates suddenly hinge on the occasional poor judgment of one or two of their staffers.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Have a nice evening yourself, Restore. Any Xanax in the house by chance?
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)chocolate will have to do.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)I have never associated chocolate with having to do in that sense as if it were some sort of second choice rather than the first choice. That seems so strange.
And yes this is a silly issue. I'm sure the campaign worked hard to prepare for the debate on the existing rules and it's frustrating when something comes up to change that, coupled with a highly stressful environment and somebody might have said something impolite. I snapped at somebody at work a few years ago under much less stressful situations. Shit happens.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but i suppose pharm grade relaxants would have a more powerful effect. hopefully i am not thst stressed out....
DCBob
(24,689 posts)he/she doesn't have a right to an opinion?
do you really think comments like this aren't being made daily by all camps? the press should be ashamed of themselves presenting this as legitimate news.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)they are irrelevant
DCBob
(24,689 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)because it is meaningless.
its like if a hillary aide said she hates chocolate! who cares?
DCBob
(24,689 posts)If he isn't speaking for Bernie he should inform CBS so they will also know his comments are "meaningless" and can simply ignore the fool.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)This was supposed to be a debate focused on economics. Foreign policy was not going to be a significant part of it.
Since the DNC has limited us to so few debates, that means those economic questions will not be asked in a debate.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The entire point of their bullshit is to get you to make an OP like this one.
The problem is with only 4 debates, changing the entire content of this debate means many issues will not be covered at all in a debate.
Instead, they're hoping you'll confirm their anonymously-sourced story and its bullshit framing. Stop helping them.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)we all have our weak moments i suppose. and lying really pisses me off.
MADem
(135,425 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)hill2016
(1,772 posts)I don't think they are the ones who want to limit the amount of time spent on foreign policy ...
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)Beausoir
(7,540 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,623 posts)msrizzo
(796 posts)and accordingly, I have been shaking my head at his campaign. I have no idea what Bernie's reaction would have been had he been on the phone, but he is in charge of his campaign and his staff. That's how it works.
72DejaVu
(1,545 posts)he will assemble an administration with more care than he has taken with his amateurish campaign staff.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)hill2016
(1,772 posts)does Bernie have the necessary foreign policy and national security gravitas to be President?
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Next question.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)a 40 year politician, mayor, rep and senator has no busniess even running. hard to believe he made it this far.
heavy snark no extra charge
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)So why not Bernie?
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)MineralMan
(146,331 posts)Nothing else matters.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)refreshing.
MineralMan
(146,331 posts)The discussions are premature. After the debate, we'll know how the candidates handled this issue and can decide what we think. Until then, we have nothing to discuss.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I think he kicks her ass on how her IWR vote led to ISIS and he wins.
It's really that simple.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)something tells me it may not be a slam dunk. mods like to shit stir
DianeK
(975 posts)Bernie will kill this debate...and perhaps people will actually watch it and defeat DWS intentions! DWS and Hillary are scared to death that people will actually watch!
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)a mummy movie watcher might catch that quote...but i do like the confidence! it helps
jkbRN
(850 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)According to an unnamed source, the changes did not sit well with a representative for Bernie Sanders' campaign.
Hmmm, I wonder which unnamed campaign from which an unnamed source, is trying to make an issue out of this?
George II
(67,782 posts)And It wasn't just any staffer it was his top strategist, Mark Longabaugh.
https://www.yahoo.com/politics/sanders-aide-pushes-back-against-cbs-switch-to-215805298.html
http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/14/politics/paris-terror-attacks-bernie-sanders-democratic-debate/index.html
It was during a conference call that several people were involved with. I'm sure the full story will come out by tomorrow.
thebighobgoblin
(179 posts)Bernie's a one-trick pony. "Let's talk about Citizens United."
Is that what his presidency's based on? Overturning a Supreme Court case? LOL!
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)you should check it out
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)They grasp at straws...'cause they have nothing else.
Lame.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)And the hypocritical Clintonites claimed I was calling her a nasty name. So describing her foreign policy is name calling? I'm really beginning to actually hate these people and find them disgusting, petty, selfish and generally full of it. Good luck bringing people together. You cant even face the truth.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Last edited Sun Nov 15, 2015, 12:38 AM - Edit history (1)
But censorship??? Thats the only card they have to play? They cannot deny that not only republicans are neocons. Did they not witness what liberal democrat Tony Blair did??? He is a neocon. And Hillary supported all the same war mongering policies. These people just cannot face the truth and live in a magic bubble. It blows my mind that all the things they accused Bush followers of doing when tuning out reality they do EXACTLY the same. Bernie is the only fresh air we have seen in decades. And they want to wish him away for their own petty reasons? Politics is just a sport to these people. They must not have any real life or death situations to face. If they cared at all about our country they would step back and let Bernie do what they cannot.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)the folly and danger of identity and cult personality politics.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)But how can they be so dumbed down to be fooled by cult of personality politics? I thought they were educated. I'm ashamed of any corporate stooge that pretends to care about protecting our democracy while doing the opposite and voting for Wall St selected tools. Trust is the basis for any relationship. Everyone knows this. And yet they still support Hillary when everyone definitely TRUSTS Bernie while most people wince in pain at how untrustworthy Hillary appears. She cant even hide it...she exudes it with every breath. These followers of hers are in for a rude awakening when they discover that if half her party cannot stand her then she stands no chance in a general where the other side already hates her too.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i am also mystified by people who say they believe in progressive ideas and support a candidate who obviously is antithetical to those principles.
it is especially stunning because most here were strongly against the iwr, cu, and for single payer health care.
i will never get it.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)You gotta walk the walk. Are people so dumb and foolish here they dont understand that little law of nature? Do they not recall in 2000 when Bush ran as a compassionate, moderate? Anyone can say anything. You have to prove it.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Duval
(4,280 posts)thebighobgoblin
(179 posts)He proved himself incapable.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)don't know what you were watching
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)He was spectacular and if you don't like it, why don't you just weigh in with the Time and Fox polls. Sanders is easily winning this debate in the high 80 percentile.
thebighobgoblin
(179 posts)But not Bernie.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)... reality has a way of clearing out what we want to believe.
Yes, O'Malley did well.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)It was the "camp", you see. When I asked how the whole camp was on speaker phone, they didn't connect the lunacy of this whole assumption.
So, I guess they were not having a nice evening. Now that the 2nd debate is over, they're REALLY not having a nice evening...
Go figure...
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i am not upset about it anymore, but at that moment, the lies that bernie himself was saying that really pissed me off.
feeling better after seeing the debate
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)or couldn't handle being president when he had nothing to do with the comment.
dirty pool.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)Sanders refuses to spend more time talking about terrorism
as President you do not get to ignore national emergencies just because you're not prepared for them
If Bernie can't handle the sudden change....
then he's clearly not ready to be president.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Refusing to spend more time talking about something? Is THAT your definition of a lie?
If so, you need to look up the definition of a LIE.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)have a nice evening.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Yeah... G'Nite. Get some sleep.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)makes me suspect that Hill ran the table again.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)this all happened much earlier
Eko
(7,351 posts)has nothing to do with what she said as it does with what someone on her staff said. So turn about is fair play.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but politics is nasty all around i suppose