2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFriend says Clinton tried to join Marines as exercise in women's rights
http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/12/politics/hillary-clinton-marines/index.htmlRead before commenting.
And article from 1994 with friends making the same claim then: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1994/06/15/hillary-clinton-not-fit-for-the-few-the-proud/1ea062a0-34ec-40eb-bc66-dc4e5e1760eb/
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Then why did she leave that part out? If that was the point of the exercise she would have led with that when telling the story. Such bullshit.
mcar
(42,334 posts)"This whole idea that she is fabricating certain things, I am sorry, she has done a lot of things in her life that most women have not done," Henry said. "She was a trailblazer."
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)He must have missed the part where she was campaigning for Barry Goldwater!
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)student when she said she was a Goldwater girl . Then you missed the part were her teacher got her to take the side of Lyndon Johnson in a high school debate. You forgot that she studied for a long time to learn Johnson's positions for the debate. You forgot that she became a Democrat in college and has been ever since
This one's for you
mcar
(42,334 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Hepburn
(21,054 posts)Wow......I had to defend the death penalty when I was in high school debate.
That means nothing.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Your not running for President thank god
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)You aren't a trailblazer if you pretend to be interested in signing up 56 years later.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)that's what it is.
Response to berni_mccoy (Reply #3)
Post removed
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)No one needs to lie about this stupid claim of Hillary's. On it's face, it is bunk.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)She claims she told the recruiter in 1975 she was 26, about to be 27. She turned 28 in 1975.
Her own story has her lying about her age.
riversedge
(70,239 posts)Earlier the guest made a rather snarky comment--why would she want to join the service. just graduated-she is lawyer.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Segami
(14,923 posts)- "...Clinton has never described her visit to the Marine recruiting office in this context..."
Now lets go back to the NYT 1994 story:
She was 27 then, she said, and the Marine recruiter was about 21. She was interested in joining either the active forces or the reserves, she recalled, but was swiftly rebuffed by the recruiter, who took a dim view of her age and her thick glasses. 'Not Very Encouraging'
"You're too old, you can't see and you're a woman," Mrs. Clinton said she was told, adding that the recruiter dismissed her by suggesting she try the Army. "Maybe the dogs would take you," she recalled the recruiter saying.
"It was not a very encouraging conversation," she said. "I decided maybe I'll look for another way to serve my country."
http://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/15/us/hillary-clinton-says-she-once-tried-to-be-marine.html
Now where did she claim back in 1975 (as her friend has stated) that she is "just testing the way military treated women"?
Even if that were the case, it would mean that Hillary's intention was NEVER about enlisting into the Marines but rather to expose how the military treated women interested in enlisting. Why haven't we heard her voice that story version?
After the Marine Corp rejected her, what exactly did she do as "another way to serve my country."?
Take the stink test.......if it smells like sh*t, looks like sh*t, feels like sh*t.....maybe its really sh*t!
tularetom
(23,664 posts)Convenient how this friend pops up and "explains" the story immediately after it gets national attention and looks like yet another fabrication.
BTW, that quote was from the article that you instructed us to read before commenting.
TM99
(8,352 posts)Here is her story --
Nothing about women or the recruiter pointing out she was a woman, only a comment on her age, which is bogus. For decades the oldest age for 1st time enlistment has been 30 years old. If she was telling the truth, yes, a recruiter would have jumped on getting her a commission with her law degree at 27.
Besides, she has already been caught in the age lie (in 1975, she would have been 27 going on 28), the timing lie (her wedding to Bill in October of that year having moved there that summer), and really the worst lie of all.
She is trying to make Veterans Day about her! Is she talking about vets? No, she is telling a story about her self. And when called out on this fabrication, she doubles down now with the help of her sycophant friends and supporters on the fucking sexism line.
No Hillary, this isn't about you. It isn't about women or sexism. It is about you telling a fucking lie on Veterans Day to try impress someone who you thought needed to be impressed just like you told the Bosnian sniper lie in the last election.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Wouldn't it be a little important to at least draw attention to the recruiter at the time? Especially if she actually was a trailblazer?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)At the time, according to the Times report, Clinton's spokesman chalked the story up to the first lady "exploring all her options."
"I'm never surprised when Mrs. Clinton is doing something service oriented," Neal Lattimore told the paper. "She was just taking in all her options, saying 'This is where I am in my life, this is what fits into my life right now.'"
Bill Clinton, too, has used a similar story about his wife's desire to join the military.
The former president told an audience in Columbus, Indiana during the 2008 election that his then girlfriend "went down and tried to join the Army and they said 'Your eyes are so bad, nobody will take you.'"
http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/11/politics/hillary-clinton-marine-army-recruit-2016-election/index.html
If it was simply an "exercise" why did Hillary say she would look for another way to serve her country?
Nice spin from her friend but no cigar.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)LOL.
Wonder if the MSM will pick up on this one.
We should email the author.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The op's truthiness questions about Bernie marching with MLK doesn't help her credibility either.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Youre just pulling poor Bill into it, arent you? ARENT YOU??????????
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)So why are people immediately defaulting to the belief that Hillary Clinton is lying about this, when there's no evidence to support that?
It's simply disgusting.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Bernie claims he marched with MLK and no one here questions his claim.
BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)That was published in the 1990s.
It's not the first time she's said this. She said it 20 years ago publicly. She also told her friends 40 years ago.
People--Democrats-- are calling her a liar based on no evidence at all, and with evidence to the contrary.
I think a lot of people on here need to take a deep breath. All we have to do is see the huge response to that one thread in which some anonymous Reddit poster claimed to have been a paid Clinton troll to see that. People are believing what they want, despite the facts and evidence.
We're supposed to be a reality-based community here.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Or Bill's version which I cited above.
Bernie has a history of civil rights activism from that time which makes your truther claims absurd. Hillary lied about coming under sniper fire so she has a history of making up stories to make herself seem brave.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)that Sanders being at MLK's march and Clinton's bunk story about joining the military (and many others), then there is really no hope for her. She's only going to get the fringe.
Response to berni_mccoy (Reply #32)
Cali_Democrat This message was self-deleted by its author.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)Which do you think is more likely?
Clinton told a lie to her friends 40 years ago, for no plausible reason, and just decided to keep repeating it over the next four decades...
or
Clinton is telling the truth.
Are we in some weird place now where we can call Clinton a liar without any evidence at all?
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)For me, personally, the Bosnian sniper fire story means that Hillary doesn't get the benefit of a doubt on things that don't pass the smell test.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)your own post
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)LOL at people who checks recs.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)don't matter and no one should look?? Deception at it's finest, just like when you saw Bernie tweet about the meeting with Sandra Bland's mother. Boy gotta love it...
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)That's like Hillary taking a poll of her own friends...
Wait a MINUTE!
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Another op described what is being done against Clinton as just that.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)Im fine with a canidate who has been in the military. Im fine with one who has not. I just dont care if somebody was almost in the military.
Im going to almost vote for Hilary, but then choose bearnie instead.
I like the way you think!