2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumthis if probably going to get me flamed from both sides, but hang singly, we die
LOOK!
I don't like Hillary, that's ok, she's left of US center of political spectrum
I do like Bernie, he's very left of US center of political spectrum
here is my point
have you seen the opposition?
trump
carson
rubio
and we are fighting each other?
can we all spell 'we are too stoopid to figgure out how to win'?
can we all spell 'this is how we loose'?
i'd prefer Bernie or O'm to win, i'll deal with H
but fighting internally NOW only helps 'R'
so if you want to
cool, go join the R light crowd and jump up and down at being a happy looser!
hang alone, hang as a small group, revolutionize as an army!
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)and that pretty much nails it...because the other night we tried to find someone further to the Left of Bernie....all we could find was poor poor Socialist Eugene Debs...who Bernie apparently models himself after....
TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)It provides you ALL the datapoints that it measures..those datapoints...public record.
TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts).
There are various social and economic issues that drive both parties.
Just read, for just a simple Progressive view, Teddy Roosevelt's Osawatomie speech that Obama modeled one of his after. Without going into a political science breakdown of it's interpretation--suffice it to say that the simplistic chart provided does everyone injury!
https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/12/06/archives-president-teddy-roosevelts-new-nationalism-speech
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/12/06/remarks-president-economy-osawatomie-kansas
Nate Silver - really? He's what you use to describe the aspects of politics and their intersections? He's a great statistician...
.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Politics in the United States...
and Nate Silver is a Statistician...its what he does for a living...and not just for politics.....I think I will take his OPINION of the data that chart represents....and that is what it is based on their public record.
Can YOU name ANYONE who was to the Left of Bernie Sanders that ran for President?
TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts).
That's what I was posting, not the antithesis.
I was trying to convey that Conservatives ALSO have social issues and Liberals ALSO have economic ones.
That crazy chart implies polar extremes.
Just because no one is left of Sanders, does not place him at the 100% left aspect of any chart, there is room to go!
I think that my favorite politican, Shirley Chisholm, comes close.
.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)So has Nate Silver... Have YOU???
TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts).
Nate Silver is a great statistician, but that chart shows political ignorance, especially the way you presented it.
.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)But that is one of the main reasons I'm voting for him.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Now tell me...WHO has run for President that is to the Left of Bernie Sanders....
TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)He's on the left, I'm right there with him...however many people are further left is irrelevant to this race.
Plus your chart is flawed anyway, if he's that far left, how could he possibly be to the right of Clinton on guns? That alone would mean there is still room to move left, but your graph doesn't allow for that.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)It's when we discuss differences between the Democratic Presidential candidates. Welcome to politics.
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)i agree it's a primary
but a primary that makes people say "Ef it..i won't if it's not my rep" <<---this is bad
we can should work as a unit, or just toss shit at the glass and act like chimps and expect to get bfed by the scientists
oh and politics...i only spent 32 years doing that shit in europe...you guys don't do politics, you do mudslinging and bribing
prove me wrong this election!
artislife
(9,497 posts)If we fight amongst ourselves for the best candidate to lead the charge, good
OPs like this celebrate obedience for the sake of obedience and not for anything good.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]No squirrels were harmed in the making of this post. Yet.[/center][/font][hr]
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)i didn't hurt any squirrels making the post either...so far
i did support a few squadrons of them that were rabid! *Jk*
aidbo
(2,328 posts)You will definitely be flamed for this.
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)out over five or ten percentage points of ideological difference between candidates.
We'll get past it. A few die-hard dickweeds on one side or the other will have to get booted but the rest of us will brush ourselves off and get on with the next part of the job.
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)of the vote possibly doesn't worry you Codeine? (i normally read your posts with respect but...? )
Codeine
(25,586 posts)We're the liberal subset of the political junkie population. We're the subset of THAT population that argues online, with the complete sentences, proper punctuation, and organized thoughts entailed therein. And we're the subset of THAT population that uses DU.
I'm not altogether too worried about the idea that we're going to lose any significant number of votes to this argument. President Obama did fine without the handful of PUMAs that flatly refused to support him, and Clinton/Sanders will do fine without the die-hard BernieBros/Clintonistas that blindly refuse to support our candidate in the general.
delrem
(9,688 posts)She's very much to the right of Obama on matters of war and foreign policy, and I daresay she's to the right of Obama on economic policy as well. In her recent Brookings speech she vowed to govern to the right of Ronald Reagan in matters to do with the ME and elsewhere - or at any rate, she applauded Reagan's outlook and vowed to add more stridency to it. She vows to embrace Israel and Netanyahu ("Bibi", to her), the two of which she seems to identify, and to do a reset after the Obama setback, bringing her administration into solid Republican alignment. Exactly how is that different than Rubio?
She says that she'll govern in a "purple space" where her bipartisan skills will allow her to negotiate with Republicans, and all we see from her is how she likes to punch down. She disrespects "progressives" and brushes off concerns for economic justice, claiming instead to be a paragon for racial and social justice abstract from such inelegant concerns.
That's not "left of center" except in a wonky Alice in Wonderland kind of way.
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)please read though this thread, and try to figure out why D's have a hard time winning
we...are...our...own...worst...enemies...
and proud of it!
delrem
(9,688 posts)Your OP is only one step removed from being yet another "loyalty oath" OP, saying "my way or the highway, loser!", as if that's the only argument capable of being said.
But no. People will insist on discussing issues, regardless.
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)good on you
and you prove my point thanks
this is the work together we get
'i'll fuck you over as hard as i can' <<--woooohoooo impressed on left loyalty
delrem
(9,688 posts)That's a new one.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)Coalitions are vital to meaningful progressive change.
No flame from me wOnderer.
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)A lot of people seem really pissed off.
You could post 'the sky is blue where I'm living' and you'd get a bunch of people saying you're a liar because it's not blue at night.
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)ummm yes it is, however less light shows it at black!
ooh lovemydog...thanks!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Philosophically, of course, you are correct.
However, primary season is always a series of clusterfucks and barroom brawls around here.
Ignore the shit-flinging, it'll be over eventually.
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)lose vs loose
my bad..3rd language apologies
I'd love to talk spelling if I can learn from it
second line
i wonder how many real "du members" would join in cf and BB here?
i'd love to see the blood?
wilco Warren..thank for calm down bro
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)w0nderer
(1,937 posts)and figure (and it was intentional)
we all should work together!
now read the thread again
sad isn't it?
how people won't agree
so so sad
they can win because they have a TEAM
or we can win because we have a ...T...umm no can't stand T how bout x...no..how.
......dammit!
Raster
(20,998 posts)...I will do whatever it takes to make sure a Republican is not elected the next POTUS. Whatever it takes, period. There is far, far too much riding on this next POTUS election: it is all about the SCOTUS, period. Whatever it takes.
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)this is the 'cooperation' that's available on the 'left'
and we expect to win?
will someone please clue in
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)w0nderer
(1,937 posts)yes hillary is left of centrum
in the rest of the world she'd be right wing fanatic