Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 04:37 AM Nov 2015

To those Bernie supporters who attack PoC for not supporting him right now...Stop, just STOP

Last edited Wed Nov 11, 2015, 02:21 AM - Edit history (3)

If you're doing that, for whatever reason, you aren't helping.

It's up to our campaign and our movement to make a positive case for PoC to come over and join. It isn't up to PoC to defend themselves for not coming over yet.

We need to listen, we need to change our approach, and we need to damn well clean up our act in online forums. PoC are feeling harassed and intimidated by those who purport to back this campaign and the long-term movement for the basic, strutural changes out society and our world needs.

It's some of our supporters that need to change, not PoC.

(on edit)

Oh, and despite all the smug posts from HRC supporters, their candidate has never been good on PoC issues, so no, the aren't entitled to gloat about anything in this thread.

143 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
To those Bernie supporters who attack PoC for not supporting him right now...Stop, just STOP (Original Post) Ken Burch Nov 2015 OP
No one is attacking anyone because of their race. Fearless Nov 2015 #1
Agreed Art_from_Ark Nov 2015 #2
Doing racist things, Rebkeh Nov 2015 #37
Oh!!!! Really????? There has been heaven05 Nov 2015 #78
Not even remotely true Fearless Nov 2015 #80
right heaven05 Nov 2015 #85
Yes, right. Fearless Nov 2015 #86
I never said a "vast majority " of DUers are racist. heaven05 Nov 2015 #89
Because your story breaks down you're done talking Fearless Nov 2015 #90
That is not true at all. blackspade Nov 2015 #95
You came back big JustAnotherGen Nov 2015 #118
they always speak without having heaven05 Nov 2015 #129
Yeah, I've got to agree with Fearless on this one. PatrickforO Nov 2015 #109
HRC And Her Supporters Have Created This False Narrative cantbeserious Nov 2015 #3
when bernie fails to be elected it will be his fault no one else. stonecutter357 Nov 2015 #7
False Narrative Is False Narrative - Elected Or Not cantbeserious Nov 2015 #13
The polls clearly show ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #40
What does the Isidewith poll say? bravenak Nov 2015 #53
Sorry ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #55
I had to check myself earlier too. bravenak Nov 2015 #56
FACTS!!???!!! NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #57
Those get alerted. bravenak Nov 2015 #58
Yeah, I know ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #60
They also hate my siglines. Dunno why, I think they're fine. bravenak Nov 2015 #62
No worries. NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #66
Millions of us. It affects our friends and family too. bravenak Nov 2015 #68
If Bernie fails it will be because Wall St succeeded. raouldukelives Nov 2015 #16
wall st doesn't vote vote for me. stonecutter357 Nov 2015 #20
Glad to hear that! For so many out there, it does, every dollar. nt raouldukelives Nov 2015 #22
No, but they pay enough so that others who aren't paying attention do vote for them. n/t Dawgs Nov 2015 #29
But do you vote for wall street? SwampG8r Nov 2015 #79
So you have an excuse built in? Renew Deal Nov 2015 #52
I suppose? It was the same excuse I used when Bush won. raouldukelives Nov 2015 #74
^^^THIS^^^ NorthCarolina Nov 2015 #127
Says the supporter creating false narratives one line at a time. JTFrog Nov 2015 #134
Have Only The Observed Behavior At DU To Rely Upon cantbeserious Nov 2015 #138
Most people are not political junkies and are not paying attention eridani Nov 2015 #4
Epiphany in the cloister of cosmicone Nov 2015 #5
Latest meme. murielm99 Nov 2015 #8
Yes. Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #10
If only waldo.c Nov 2015 #11
Good one! Paka Nov 2015 #12
None of us think he's a saint. Ken Burch Nov 2015 #48
It is okay to support a person cosmicone Nov 2015 #67
Uncalled for. blackspade Nov 2015 #96
K&R! stonecutter357 Nov 2015 #6
Horseshit, Ken, just horseshit. TM99 Nov 2015 #9
Thank you TM99 PotatoChip Nov 2015 #14
I agree. LuvNewcastle Nov 2015 #17
Welcome back. You were missed. Autumn Nov 2015 #39
Thank you for this. bobbobbins01 Nov 2015 #44
Unfortunately, you just made Ken's point for him blackspade Nov 2015 #99
+1 lovemydog Nov 2015 #115
No, I did not make his point. TM99 Nov 2015 #119
link please? because I haven't seen Bernie supporters attack PoC anywhere on DU. magical thyme Nov 2015 #15
Alert stalking is an attack. blackspade Nov 2015 #97
If and this is a big if... TM99 Nov 2015 #120
It does work both ways. blackspade Nov 2015 #125
So let's add me to that list. TM99 Nov 2015 #128
Sorry, that sucks. blackspade Nov 2015 #131
It is real in a subjective sense. TM99 Nov 2015 #133
It is the swarming that sucks artislife Nov 2015 #143
Skinner and EarlG have stated Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #121
Then how would you describe the bullshit alerts and hides? blackspade Nov 2015 #126
I will when I get to my PC Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #132
The bullshit alerts and hides are a function of our jury system, not a conspiracy. Comrade Grumpy Nov 2015 #136
I've seen this claim, many times, but not the attacks. nt. polly7 Nov 2015 #18
Yeah show me the attacks as well. Puglover Nov 2015 #32
Here's a few recent comments. lovemydog Nov 2015 #73
And you responded very politely. And I thank you for it. Puglover Nov 2015 #75
Thank you Puglover. lovemydog Nov 2015 #84
You were very kind and thoughtful to do this, my friend Number23 Nov 2015 #87
Thank you for your kind words my friend. lovemydog Nov 2015 #88
SPLC is a fabulous organization. I am so happy (but not surprised) to see your support for them! Number23 Nov 2015 #140
Yes N23. lovemydog Nov 2015 #141
I'll pre-emptively say that any alerts on this post are bullshit. blackspade Nov 2015 #98
Thank you blackspade. lovemydog Nov 2015 #112
Your welcome, and you have a good rest of the week as well! blackspade Nov 2015 #123
I have seen this claim made repeatedly by a single person AgingAmerican Nov 2015 #83
Wow, you sure drank some Koolaid there Android3.14 Nov 2015 #19
Hillary camp? stonecutter357 Nov 2015 #21
Really! hootinholler Nov 2015 #43
What happens on DU time and again edgineered Nov 2015 #23
Word. beam me up scottie Nov 2015 #25
I'm just bugged that Bernie is being accused of being a racist when he clearly isn't. Vinca Nov 2015 #24
Not this shit again. n/t winter is coming Nov 2015 #26
The injury is almost entirely from the other campaign's use of such racial memes. leveymg Nov 2015 #27
Nice post. Dawgs Nov 2015 #30
Link please?? darkangel218 Nov 2015 #28
The gawddamn "attacking" I see is from ONE "PoC" on Senator Sanders. 99Forever Nov 2015 #31
Yeah, I'm pretty new here and I'm noticing this strange dynamic you speak of jack_krass Nov 2015 #63
I'm out of the loop on social media...is this common on some social media? HereSince1628 Nov 2015 #33
Yes Rebkeh Nov 2015 #35
which suggests its a problem on DU, I've miss this problem HereSince1628 Nov 2015 #36
I haven't. Ever. LWolf Nov 2015 #34
Same here. The first thing that struck me with the title and text was that ALL Bernie appalachiablue Nov 2015 #42
I've changed the title in accordance with your suggestions. Thanks. n/t. Ken Burch Nov 2015 #50
I have seen no Bernie supporters ATTACKING PoC for not supporting Bernie. Autumn Nov 2015 #38
Well, who'da thunk it? NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #41
A lot of us have always realized it. Ken Burch Nov 2015 #45
"Changed for much the better"?? Are you serious? senz Nov 2015 #46
Yes, but he's getting much better at communicating it. Ken Burch Nov 2015 #49
Now you understand what we Hillary Clinton supporters have to contend with? BlueCaliDem Nov 2015 #72
Wow Ken, I am so sorry you are getting this reaction. Thanks for trying though. bettyellen Nov 2015 #81
So in other words ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #54
I do get it. Ken Burch Nov 2015 #59
Okay, Ken ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #61
I'll offer some guesses...I wouldn't presume to "whitemansplain" PoC candidate support patterns. Ken Burch Nov 2015 #70
Right off the top ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #94
You asked him what he thought given that he is not a POC. blackspade Nov 2015 #100
Yes, I asked. NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #101
It was a potential teaching moment that you chose to ignore. blackspade Nov 2015 #103
I am not in need ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #104
He wasn't teaching, but responding to YOUR question. blackspade Nov 2015 #105
I asked Ken to explain ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #106
So why will you not answer? blackspade Nov 2015 #107
Not being an AA or PoC ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #108
That's a cop out. blackspade Nov 2015 #110
Oh, I have my opinions ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #111
I have. blackspade Nov 2015 #124
According to this whatchamacallit Nov 2015 #113
Well there's your just reward for trying to be fair and open minded. Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #64
I don't disagree with you about the 'racial issue's" origin.... blackspade Nov 2015 #102
Getting the over reaction was the whole goal. Bread and Circus Nov 2015 #130
Good post Dem2 Nov 2015 #47
Thank you Ken Burch. lovemydog Nov 2015 #51
Attacked? jack_krass Nov 2015 #65
Well said emulatorloo Nov 2015 #69
Thank you. n/t. Ken Burch Nov 2015 #71
Quit telling people what to do. Jester Messiah Nov 2015 #76
I agree with you MuseRider Nov 2015 #77
Define attack in this context? aikoaiko Nov 2015 #82
Yeah; all none of you, cut it out!! n/t winter is coming Nov 2015 #91
Speaking of "just stop"... MrMickeysMom Nov 2015 #92
Agreed. Bravenak's stalkers are a good example. blackspade Nov 2015 #93
Sure. Now just find me any Bernies supporters who are "attacking" people of color Maedhros Nov 2015 #114
I'd like to get your unbiased thoughts on this... seaglass Nov 2015 #122
I don't see an "attack" on anyone. Maedhros Nov 2015 #137
You didn't see that as an attack on Bravenak suggesting she was race nagging? Would she have to seaglass Nov 2015 #139
Bravenak likes to antagonize people to get a reaction. Maedhros Nov 2015 #142
Who are these people? ArcticFox Nov 2015 #116
glad to see us all pull together MFM008 Nov 2015 #117
For the record... Bobbie Jo Nov 2015 #135

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
1. No one is attacking anyone because of their race.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 04:41 AM
Nov 2015

There is absolutely nothing wrong for calling people on their bull shit claims that Bernie is somehow a racist.

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
37. Doing racist things,
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 10:27 AM
Nov 2015

even accidentally, does not necessarily make one a racist. True. But... that thing, whatever it may be, does need to be called out as racist.

Too many overlook that nuance.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
78. Oh!!!! Really????? There has been
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 01:22 PM
Nov 2015

a concerted effort to SHUT DOWN any response(s) from PoC not glowingly positive about BS. Fact.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
89. I never said a "vast majority " of DUers are racist.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 09:13 PM
Nov 2015

that's your understanding dredged from where, I could never understand, I'm sure. I said there is a concerted effort to shut up certain POC on this site by certain others. I'm not going to change my words to fit your comfort zone. And I really have gotten past worrying about anyone here disagreeing with me. No BFD with me. Have a good day, done with you.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
90. Because your story breaks down you're done talking
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 10:05 PM
Nov 2015

The fact is that there IS NOT a concerted effort (which is by definition a group of more than a few) to silence people of color on this site.

There is a concerted effort however to show you that Hillary Clinton doesn't give a fuck about you.

But that falls on deaf ears.

There IS a concerted effort however to troll Bernie supporters with nonsensical straw men, ad hominem attacks, and logical leaps whose intent is to label us as racists, sexists, homophobes(?!), and so on.

Calling people out on their bull shit attacks on us is also not racist, sexists, homophobic, etc.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
95. That is not true at all.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 01:01 AM
Nov 2015

A concerted effort does not need to involve more than a few.

And the stalking of POC posters is a fact here at DU.

Clinton may not give a fuck about POC, but it is incumbent on those of us that support other candidates to show why OUR candidate does give a fuck, not lecture them about why their candidate sucks for them.
Treat them like adults and lay your case out. If they agree, awesome, if not, move on to a more receptive audience.
I think POC are fully capable of reaching their own decisions about who will work best for them and their families.

I do the same as a Sanders supporter and respect their ability to do likewise.

Sorry for the rant, but this bullshit has to end.

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
118. You came back big
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 05:37 AM
Nov 2015

The poster blw probably doesn't realize you've been to Sanders supporters Organizing (Face to Face, feet on the ground, GOTV) meetings.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
129. they always speak without having
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:03 AM
Nov 2015

a true grasp of reality with respect to the intelligence and reasoning ability of many POC and others on this site. I'm not ever going to bite my tongue again, in any instance, with them I mentioned making a concerted effort to silence the AA voice here. And that's in both protected forums, as you well know and elsewhere here. I'm totally turned off by BS. I see you've been keeping up the good fight...

PatrickforO

(14,577 posts)
109. Yeah, I've got to agree with Fearless on this one.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 03:01 AM
Nov 2015

With a few exceptions, I see a giant wedge being driven into the party to ensure a Clinton victory. Is Clinton behind it? Maybe, but someone sure is managing surrogate talking points, and I increasingly suspect money has changed hands, even with some on DU.

Sorry, but making a candidate's strength into a weakness and then repeating it and repeating and repeating and repeating it and repeating it and repeating and repeating and repeating it and repeating it and repeating and repeating and repeating it and

repeating it and repeating and repeating and repeating it and

repeating it and repeating and repeating and repeating it and

IS STRAIGHT OUT OF THE BOOK OF ROVE AND LEE ATWATER. It is. Dirty, lying politics.

But, you know, the great thing about wedge issues for the power elite? They are shiny objects that distract us from the fact that dirtbags like the Waltons, the Koch brothers, Sheldon Adelson, Trump and other less well known but more powerful billionaires are picking our pockets, ripping us off, sucking up our good wages and benefits. Cheating us out of pensions that we've bled for. Systematically undermining our government, and stealing our tax money for their forever wars.

Bernie is not a racist. Clinton is not a racist. He's white. Clinton is white. I'm white. We all have had unearned white privilege our whole lives and can never ever really understand what it is to be a person of color. But all of us can still have empathy, can still at least try to get social justice by holding our representatives and senators' feet to the fire on police reform, getting rid of the tanks and other military weapons, putting body cams on officers and de-privatizing prisons. That's a start.

But pounding those wedges? No. This is the same way they always do it. With shiny objects. Divide and conquer. That is the sure the way I see this.

Fortunately, no one really cares what wonks like us are saying anyway. Oh, the media will get around to it - wedges are already being pounded on blogs. I think this time they might not work because we all saw Clinton's no-holds-barred campaign style back in 08.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
40. The polls clearly show ...
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 09:56 PM
Nov 2015

... that BS is not getting any traction among AAs and PoCs.

Is THAT a false narrative?

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
55. Sorry ...
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 12:54 AM
Nov 2015

... I forgot.





That poll shows that Bernie Sanders will win all 50 states.





Forgive me for doubting - I have been a fool.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
60. Yeah, I know ...
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 01:27 AM
Nov 2015

... but if you're worried about "alerts", here's some timely advice:

DO NOT POST FACTS.

Too many people here don't like them.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
66. No worries.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 01:51 AM
Nov 2015

All Stockholm Syndrome sufferers should take pride in asking for their affliction to be recognized.

Especially considering how many of you there are.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
68. Millions of us. It affects our friends and family too.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 01:53 AM
Nov 2015

They suffer right along with us. Hostages of Hillary. She cooks though, so we survive in the commune.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
16. If Bernie fails it will be because Wall St succeeded.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 07:33 AM
Nov 2015

Well, that is to say, corporations and individual shareholders were successful.

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)
74. I suppose? It was the same excuse I used when Bush won.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 09:24 AM
Nov 2015

It was what shareholders and the MIC wanted.

I find, more often than not, they get what they pay for.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
4. Most people are not political junkies and are not paying attention
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 06:05 AM
Nov 2015

The supposition that most PoC are not political junkies and are not paying attention follows from the more general statement.

We should be focusing on outreach, and it does not help to assume that everyone else is a political junkie just like we are. Phoning and doorbelling is an excellent corrective--it cured me of that assumption in 2003-2003.

murielm99

(30,745 posts)
8. Latest meme.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 06:38 AM
Nov 2015

Everyone will be posting this now. This is the first of many threads instructing Bernie supporters to ease up. All of them will get a hundred or so recs.

 

waldo.c

(43 posts)
11. If only
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 06:47 AM
Nov 2015

Queen Hillary's supporters were capable of having an epiphany. Too busy swatting straw bugs I guess.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
48. None of us think he's a saint.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 12:06 AM
Nov 2015

Just the best and most principled person for the job. Why do Clinton supporters always mock the idea of people actually feeling genuine enthusiasm for the candidate they support? Is there something wrong with believing the person you back for an office might truly make a difference, might be something beyond just blandly, mundanely tolerable?

Does politics always HAVE to be "shut up and eat your spinach"?

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
67. It is okay to support a person
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 01:52 AM
Nov 2015

but "best and most principled" is laughable.

He was principled in not needing a pollster .... he hired a pollster.
He was principled to not attack Hillary ... he is attacking Hillary.

I could cite many examples of this.

Face it .. Bernie is JUST ANOTHER POLITICIAN ... some may like him, fine .. but a saint/messiah/divine entity he is not. He is JUST ANOTHER POLITICIAN after power by capitalizing on the fringe, ultra left niche market. PERIOD.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
9. Horseshit, Ken, just horseshit.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 06:39 AM
Nov 2015

Last edited Tue Nov 10, 2015, 07:16 AM - Edit history (1)

The meme has apparently worked.

Sanders and his supporters are 'racists' that must change and not PoC.

Not only is this factually wrong, it is condescending and racist. The concept of the 'magical negro' is apparently something you and many Clinton supporters are not aware of.

Look as a PoC, I can unequivocally state that there are as many low information voters who vote against their own best self-interest in the latino and AA communities as there are whites in their communities. This is an American citizen condition, not something unique to a subset by race.

There is nothing special about the color of our skin that somehow magically gives us some keen political insights.

Yes, there are a few very vocal PoC here (all Clinton supporters by the way!) who want to convince us they are embarrassed or harassed. There are PoC Sanders supporters who get just as much shit from the Clinton posse.

PoC are not a monolithic group. Some political junkies will support Sanders here and elsewhere. Some political junkies will support Clinton here and elsewhere. And the rest are low information, overwhelmed by the economic circumstances, and just plain don't give a shit about who occupies the White House.

The Sanders campaign is doing just fine and so are his supporters. Thanks for your concern though.

LuvNewcastle

(16,846 posts)
17. I agree.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 08:02 AM
Nov 2015

People who care about politics, no matter what color they are, already are aware of Bernie's stands on the issues. I don't see why there should be any special efforts to persuade people who aren't going to vote. Bernie is about substance, not appearances. Let Hillary get endorsements from this or that group; people who want real ideas without equivocation will be attracted to Bernie. Why should we worry about pleasing Hillary supporters?

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
99. Unfortunately, you just made Ken's point for him
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 01:31 AM
Nov 2015
Look as a PoC, I can unequivocally state that there are as many low information voters who vote against their own best self-interest in the latino and AA communities as there are whites in their communities. This is an American citizen condition, not something unique to a subset by race.


This may be true, but it is on us to make our candidates case that he is the real deal. Telling 'uninformed' POC that their candidate doesn't give a shit about them when respected members of their community tells them that their candidate does care is a loosing strategy.

Try telling a LIV White voter that Trump/Carson/Rubio doesn't give a fuck about them of America and see what happens.

And I'm not giving Clinton supporters a pass either. Some of the most decisive crap at DU that I have seen lately has come from her more cult-like supporters. Some have even emerged from their other website to post in this thread.

So lets get real and talk about how our candidate supports POC issues and let them decide.



 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
119. No, I did not make his point.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 06:29 AM
Nov 2015

We are discussing a meme that has been pushed in Rovian fashion across the internet. The push back against it results in a minority of Clinton PoC supporters screaming they are being disparaged, not heard, etc.

I am telling those that push that meme or are suckered in by that meme in this thread that latinos, AA, and whites all equally are ignorant out in the real world. The color of our skin DOES NOT give us magical insight into the best pol for our needs.

I don't do that offline when I am supporting my candidate, and I have not met one Sanders supporters out there (regardless of their skin color or the car they drive) doing it either. Give us all some credit and stop buying into their agenda and their narrative.

It has become nearly impossible to talk about how good Sanders really is for PoC because of this divisive Rovian smear campaign on sites like DU. Ken has fallen for it, and apparently so have you. This is how propaganda so effectively works.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
15. link please? because I haven't seen Bernie supporters attack PoC anywhere on DU.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 07:16 AM
Nov 2015

And maybe instead of a thread that the supposed offenders probably won't see, you should call them out when and where you see the attacks.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
120. If and this is a big if...
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 06:32 AM
Nov 2015

there is alert stalking on DU, it works both ways.

Hell, we actually have proof in the form of screenshots that Clinton supporters at their little funhouse plotted to goad and bait Cali into a juried hide.

Can you provide anything anywhere that suggests Sanders supporters have done or are doing the same?

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
125. It does work both ways.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 09:48 AM
Nov 2015

And for examples besides Cali.... Bravenak, 1SBM, and Heaven5 off the top of my head.
All POC, all alert stalked.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
128. So let's add me to that list.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:00 AM
Nov 2015

I am a PoC and I just came back from a month plus 'vacation' after being alert stalked by Clinton supporters.

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
133. It is real in a subjective sense.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:20 AM
Nov 2015

Objectively, the system works and Skinner & EarlG confirm this in Ask the Admin thread on this topic.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
143. It is the swarming that sucks
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 05:46 AM
Nov 2015

Maybe Bernie supporters don't get the hides as much because of the ratio of Bernie to Hillary supporters, but we get swarmed, too. As a Latina, I don't like how AAs and Latinos are used to score points against the other side. Why do I state that I am a Latina a lot? I do it, because I need for people on this site to see that Bernie does indeed speak to a few of us in a group that H supporters say is locked up for her.

In the beginning I got swarmed a lot, by a lot of posters at the same time. I had to learn how to evade it and still state my piece. I chose my words and images carefully, usually. And I have learned when there is no use to tangle.


And now I have a lot of the angery, bull shitty and some times just annoying posters on ignore. I couldn't take the malevolence of some of it.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
126. Then how would you describe the bullshit alerts and hides?
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 09:50 AM
Nov 2015

I would love to see such a statement from them, can you provide a link?

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
136. The bullshit alerts and hides are a function of our jury system, not a conspiracy.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:43 AM
Nov 2015

The jury system is a mess, but I don't know a better method.

Jurors too often vote their sympathies and not the rules. And that's bullshit.

I see bad alerts and bad hides across the spectrum here.

The only organized alert-stalking conspiracy I am aware of is that one that came from that Hillary web site.

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
32. Yeah show me the attacks as well.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 10:03 AM
Nov 2015

It is a few posters that are not at all ashamed of putting forth patent bullshit.

Prism pens an OP with an opinion and of course it's being spun into a racist diatribe. I am so over this bullshit that 10-15 posters on this board love to spew.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
73. Here's a few recent comments.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 06:52 AM
Nov 2015

These are paraphrased, just stuff I've read here lately.

'If you don't vote for him you'll get what you deserve.'
'They call Sanders a racist.' (Who here has called Sanders a racist? Link please.)
'Maybe black voters should do more research.'
'Do black and lgbt people have Stockholm Syndrome?'
'Race nagger.'
'Race baiter.'
Presuming it's only republicans who ever do anything racist.
When someone says something is racist, taking it to mean they called you a racist.

I'm not trying to call you out specifically Puglover. I'm surprised that you & some others say you don't see it ever here. To me it's plain as day. And I don't believe it's some GOP meme. I think it's real and it's happening other places too like Facebook, twitter & other social media. There was a story about it here today, from a popular web site, but the post was hidden. I don't know why. Is it possible that you have a lot of people on ignore? Or don't read much here? Or see things differently from how I see them?

Please read the African American forum here for more examples. You'll see that many people there are not Clinton supporters. You'll also read a lot of informed voters conversing about other things too.

Note to jurors: I'm responding to someone who said 'show me the attacks.' I'm trying to respond as best I can.

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
75. And you responded very politely. And I thank you for it.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 10:16 AM
Nov 2015

I guess we have a different definition of what an attack is.

The first example you use is harsh. And I probably would not say that to anyone. But I think it about Republicans all the time. An attack however? I think it's a conclusion based on Hillary's past actions.

Who has called Sander's a racist? Please look up the loathsome OP "Not enough Bernie" OP.

I don't know the context of the "more research" comment but you're right it is never good to make a sweeping generalization. If someone said that to me I might point that out. But would I feel attacked? Hardly. It's the internets.

Stockholm Syndrome? I'm gay and I smiled at that. Sorry. I have a very thick skin.

Race nagger. Racist baiter. I think the people that throw that out need to provide examples for you.

Presuming it's only Republicans who ever do anything racist. Well it isn't only Republicans. We are ALL racists to a degree.

Which brings me to a post I made yesterday. As I predicted not a peep in response. I'll give the link so you can take a look if you wish. I simply do not think people are serious on this board about all of this. It's an internet board and what more fun could their be then scoring points with your pals and getting a gotcha on someone, or painting them as a "racist" based on one type written comment.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=790158

Again thanks. Refreshing to be addressed in a polite fashion.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
84. Thank you Puglover.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 03:38 PM
Nov 2015

I appreciate your kind response. Yes, I remember that loathsome 'Not enough Bernie' post. No excuse for that. It was over the top and unkind to supporters of Sanders. In addition, I hate it when people use one stupid or fabricated incident and try and make hay of it as though it represents all supporters of his candidacy. Another example is something that appeared yesterday about some self-proclaimed Sanders supporter who attacked a Muslim woman. I only glanced at that thread but it appeared clear the story was exaggerated (and / or parts of it were fabricated) to score some silly 'point.' I can't stand that kind of nonsense.

I also agree with you about 'we are all racists to a degree.' And about also developing a thicker skin. It can be fun and games and it can be scoring points. However I also want there to be a very comfortable dialogue going on here where gay people, black people, all types of people feel very comfortable posting here at DU. If you get a chance to check out the AA forum, you may see that sadly that is not at present the case. We can all do better at making it a less hostile environment here. And much agree with you that having a sense of humor helps a lot!

Your post brings me to an interesting observation. When you treat another poster as a human being, you can be pleasantly surprised that when they give a response like yours. You often find there's a real compassionate thoughtful person behind the screen name and post. Much appreciated.

Again, thanks. I hope our dialogue continues. Hope you enjoy a great day too.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
87. You were very kind and thoughtful to do this, my friend
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 06:36 PM
Nov 2015

The idea that because black people are not talking about specific issues that white people think we should be talking about makes our concerns about racism and racial oppression "fake" is something that says far, FAR more about the people espousing that bigotry than the people its aimed at.

I appreciate your attempt at civility and find your attempt at dialogue here to be one of the many reasons that you will always be welcomed into the AA forum and I suspect anywhere else you want to go. Hopefully your intelligence and thoughtfulness will be an inspiration to others in desperate need of such though the cynic in me doubts that entirely.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
88. Thank you for your kind words my friend.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 07:35 PM
Nov 2015

You know that I respect you and feel that everything you write here merits considerable thought and attention. I don't always reply but I read everything you write and it often provokes me into thinking in new avenues that I apply offline. You also have a wonderful sense of humor that I admire & appreciate.

The cynic in me doubts it also. The glass is half empty part says 'we will never get through to everyone, why bother, let's just remain angry and pissed off.' The glass is half full part is inspired by your posts and all the other regular contributors to the AA forum here. And by posters here who want to talk about these valuable issues and learn and grow both here and in all other aspects of our lives. I'm truly inspired by the Southern Poverty Law Center as well. I receive their newsletter and have been involved with some of their work, teaching tolerance. One of the things that I've learned most this past year is that racism is a white person's problem. And it hurts like hell. If we can reach even one person, and start addressing them as brothers and sisters rather than as screen names we hate, then we are making some progress. It's tiny progress maybe. But it's significant I think. I know that it helps make me a more relaxed person. Less fearful. More well-rounded. Thank you.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
140. SPLC is a fabulous organization. I am so happy (but not surprised) to see your support for them!
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 06:33 PM
Nov 2015
One of the things that I've learned most this past year is that racism is a white person's problem.

When black people say this, we are called "race baiters" or accused of hurling the "race card." So what you're saying is bang on, spot on true but you will probably not see very many poc saying something similar because when we do, we are skewered for it.

You also nailed another important point in one of your other posts in this thread about talking to people "as though they are human beings" which also relates to your comment about treating posters here like "brothers and sisters." One of the reasons many poc may not respond when certain individuals bring up issues of race is because we already feel that this is someone who is hostile/ignorant/deluded on race issues. People who have chased after black posters on this web site for years, have minimized or dismissed our issues, or have accused black posters of being "homophobe zombie trolls" are not the ones many of us feel are best positioned to discuss race matters with nor do we have any desire to do so. And I find it highly amusing that anyone would be surprised that any of us feel this way.

I think some here fail to realize that even though this is a web site, black folks have dealt with subtle and in your face racism for (more than likely) most of our entire lives and we know it when we see it. And a general lack of engagement with people we feel are hostile to our communities is usually the first response. People like you will be the ones to lessen that burden though let's be real, we won't see the end of racism in our lifetimes. Not even our grandchildren's. But maybe one day.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
141. Yes N23.
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 03:07 AM
Nov 2015

If something about race is said super carefully it seems acceptable. If it's said directly (as other topics are discussed, no sugar coating) then it's all 'Oh wow stop the world that person is being personal and mean!' Another example of racism being a white person problem imho.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
112. Thank you blackspade.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 03:41 AM
Nov 2015

It looks like it hasn't been alerted on, to my knowledge. It's tough knowing how to discuss these issues here. That's why I often suggest everyone read the AA group. Things are covered in comprehensive & thoughtful detail there.

Hope you enjoy a good rest of the week.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
83. I have seen this claim made repeatedly by a single person
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 02:32 PM
Nov 2015

Who never, ever has evidence to back it. Just have to take it with a grain of salt. Low information voters gonna vote against their own best interest, black or white.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
19. Wow, you sure drank some Koolaid there
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 08:05 AM
Nov 2015

That is the most bizarre tactic to come from the Hillary camp yet. Your advice is Don't criticize Clinton when talking to PoC's?

That is stupid advice.

The HRC supporters feel attacked because their candidate is the least qualified (record, trust, and corporate backing) of the three to address the issues that PoC face each day.

edgineered

(2,101 posts)
23. What happens on DU time and again
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 08:58 AM
Nov 2015

is that some posters feel they must put their voice into everything, basically making others sick of listening to him or her. Little by little, while posters stop responding, others rebel with alerts or mockery. Eventually the offensive poster might begin to wonder why no one cares about their posts anymore and self corrects. When the learning curve is a flat line all hope is lost however.

Vinca

(50,278 posts)
24. I'm just bugged that Bernie is being accused of being a racist when he clearly isn't.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 09:11 AM
Nov 2015

Anyone can vote for whoever they want. All I ask is that they get their buns out of the house on election day and vote. I'm sick to death of everyone whining about everything, but come election day they can't be bothered to show up. When people in Kentucky die because their Obamacare is gone, ask them how not showing up to vote turned out. (Yes, this makes me angry. )

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
27. The injury is almost entirely from the other campaign's use of such racial memes.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 09:27 AM
Nov 2015

Show us an instance where PoC have been attacked here unless they are offensive, aggressive posters for the HRC campaign?

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
31. The gawddamn "attacking" I see is from ONE "PoC" on Senator Sanders.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 09:58 AM
Nov 2015

It's reached the level of absurdity.

Try getting real, buddy, cuz' you're drinking a great big glass of Koolaid.

 

jack_krass

(1,009 posts)
63. Yeah, I'm pretty new here and I'm noticing this strange dynamic you speak of
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 01:37 AM
Nov 2015

Very bizzare.

I spend lots of time in the "real&quot non internet) world around all sorts of people. The vocal Bernie supporters I know I'RL are the LEAST likely people I could ever imagine attacking "POC" (or anyone else for that matter)

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
34. I haven't. Ever.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 10:11 AM
Nov 2015

I agree that it's up to our campaign to make a positive case. I know that Sanders recognizes this and has been working on it.

If PoC are feeling harassed and intimidated, it's sure as hell not by me.

In return, I have not been the least bit intimidated by the attempts of the HRC camp to harrass and attack Sanders' supporters. Of course, being the Lone Wolf that I am, I have very rarely felt intimidated by those who make the attempt in any situation.

I'm thinking right now that, if there are people involved in attacking PoC, that certainly needs to stop. I don't think the way you worded this appeal, though, helps. It's a broad-brush, and therefore inaccurate, characterization, and it feeds the meme that some HRC campaigners have been trying to grow.

appalachiablue

(41,145 posts)
42. Same here. The first thing that struck me with the title and text was that ALL Bernie
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 10:16 PM
Nov 2015

supporters are being generalized and lumped together as one. Not so for me and others.

Suggest title change to 'For the Bernie Sanders Supporters Attacking PoC for Not Supporting Bernie.' etc. Thanks.

Autumn

(45,107 posts)
38. I have seen no Bernie supporters ATTACKING PoC for not supporting Bernie.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 10:31 AM
Nov 2015

The Sanders campaign is doing just fine and so are his supporters. Thanks for your concern though.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
41. Well, who'da thunk it?
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 10:01 PM
Nov 2015

For once you and I agree on something.

"It's up to our campaign and our movement to make a positive case for PoC to come over and join. It isn't up to PoC to defend themselves for not coming over yet."

It's unfortunate that the BS campaign, and its supporters, are only beginning to realize this now - now that Bernie's campaign is circling the drain.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
45. A lot of us have always realized it.
Tue Nov 10, 2015, 11:58 PM
Nov 2015

And, despite what I've said in the OP, it still goes without saying that HRC has done nothing to earn the AA support she currently gets. That support is mainly built on the myth that she is more electable than Bernie...a myth that is totally discredited now by the polls showing that Bernie would beat Rubio, Jeb! and Trump(no polling out on a Bernie v. Carson matchup, but does anybpdy really think the Bern couldn't beat a guy who thinks the pyramids were built by Joseph-presumably while wearing his Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat-as granaries?).

Bernie himself gets it and has changed for much the better. It's some of his cybersupporters(some of whom may just be trolls working for other candidates) who need to change.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
46. "Changed for much the better"?? Are you serious?
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 12:03 AM
Nov 2015

Bernie has been 100% behind poc from the get-go.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
49. Yes, but he's getting much better at communicating it.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 12:07 AM
Nov 2015

I was complimenting the guy, for God's sakes.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
54. So in other words ...
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 12:52 AM
Nov 2015

... the AAs and PoCs who support HRC are basing that support on a "myth" they are obviously to stupid to recognize as a being a "myth".

And what "a lot of you have realized" is that you must convince them that their support is wrong-headed and based on the "myth" they have obviously been so easily duped into believing.

For one crazy moment in time there, I thought you finally "got it".

I admit that I was wrong.

You don't.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
59. I do get it.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 01:21 AM
Nov 2015

We both know HRC has hardly ever there for PoC voters, and has never taken any political risks on race and race-related issues.

I wasn't insulting PoC in saying that.

And the electability myth has been shared by the majority of Dem voters. I'm just pointing out that the polls showing Bernie beating Rubio and Trump factually discredit it...it's a matter of publicizing that fact, not of saying that anybody is stupid. Thr voters aren't stupid...it's just that the real info doesn't always get out to people. That myth has had as much to do as anything with HRC's lead among AA voters. They are a pragmatic group and nominating somebody who "can win" is big for them(as it is for Bernie supporters as well, since we reject the idea that you can be principled OR you can win the presidency, but you can't be both). I think most of us understand and respect that. It's why they backed Bill, even though he never stood with them as president.

Bernie does need to get better at conveying hope as well as anger, at communicating with AA voters and does need better outreach in the AA community in general. And he's doing that now. Mainly, some of those who support Bernie need to shut up and listen to PoC, rather than talk back.

What you're really mad about is the fact that I pointed out that HRC has never actually been good on most of the issues affecting PoC. You agreed with that in 2008, when you supported Obama against her. She's done nothing to improve on the issues for the better with her since then, and the massive Wall Street donations she gets still mean she'll fundamentally be on the side of the suites, against the streets.

Look at her words and her body language in the meeting with the BLM representatives. She never made eye contact with them, never listened to them, cut them off and treated them like they were wasting her time. There was no empathy there and she didn't treat them like equal human beings.

Is it really that hard for you to accept the fact that, while Bernie needs to work on connecting with AA and PoC voters, HRC hasn't done anything to EARN support from those groups? If they support her, that's their call. But she has no actual claim to superiority on her approach to racism.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
61. Okay, Ken ...
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 01:32 AM
Nov 2015

... you're on.

Explain to all of us here why AAs and PoCs over-whelmingly support HRC.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
70. I'll offer some guesses...I wouldn't presume to "whitemansplain" PoC candidate support patterns.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 02:18 AM
Nov 2015

I'm not a PoC(as far as I know, neither are you...if you are, I'd stand corrected) and don't claim to be inside the heads of PoC voters.

Theories I buy into(none of which I originated)

1) Greater name-familiarity(which accounts for HRC support among most whites who support her) could be one factor;

2) The "ONLY HRC is 'electable'" myth(which, as I said, is now discredited by the polls showing Bernie beating most or all GOP candidates) likely plays a major role;

3) The perception that HRC is "more qualified&quot which is debatable, given that Bernie has a longer political career than her);

4) Communication mistakes on the part of Bernie's campaign(which have now been corrected), combined with relentless misrepresentations of Bernie's positions on race(especially the endless repetition of the claim that Bernie believed ending economic inequality would end racism all by itself), and delays in responding to both of those problems on the part of the campaign;

5) Ill-tempered responses to PoC in online forums by people purporting to be Sanders supporters (some of which are likely to either be provocateurs working for other candidates or simply trolls);

6) A general perception in the AA community that President Obama will probably endorse HRC.

Those are the things that I would guess.

Do you reject any of those theories?

BTW, there is a huge difference between saying you can't understand why PoC would support HRC, on the one hand(as a lot of Bernie supporters, some of them PoC themselves, have said, and saying that PoC are stupid for doing so. Questioning why a group of people might hold the views they hold is not the same thing as insulting that group.)

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
94. Right off the top ...
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:52 AM
Nov 2015

... so most people who support HRC do so because of "greater name familiarity"? You lost me right there. That is one of the most ludicrous memes in this whole primary cycle.

While the average voter is not a political junkie like we are, I doubt they are basing their support on "I recognize her name and her face, I know who she is," and nothing more.

"The perception that HRC is "more qualified&quot which is debatable, given that Bernie has a longer political career than her)."

Seriously? You think BS is arguably 'more qualified' due to how many years he's put in? You honestly think that HRC's experience as First Lady of Arkansas, First Lady of the US, a NY senator and SoS doesn't far outweigh Bernie's decades-long career serving office in one small state?

I'm going to stop there. Your points are -- shall we say, uh, less than compelling.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
100. You asked him what he thought given that he is not a POC.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 01:47 AM
Nov 2015

So you "Explain to all of us here why AAs and PoCs over-whelmingly support HRC"

Ken is actually trying to be constructive here and all you have done the entire thread is shit on that attempt.
So are you going to be a part of the solution or the problem? Your call.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
101. Yes, I asked.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 01:54 AM
Nov 2015

And what I got back started with the premise that both white and PoC Hill supporters - or 'most' of them, as he said - are basing their support on name recognition.

That is a ludicrous meme - and the minute I see it raised as a given, I know the rest of what that poster has to say is rubbish, and not worth a full response.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
103. It was a potential teaching moment that you chose to ignore.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:00 AM
Nov 2015

So, you tell us, what is the answer to your question?

You have dismissed his answer so let's hear the correct answer.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
104. I am not in need ...
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:08 AM
Nov 2015

... of being "taught" that most of HRC's supporters are in her camp because of "name recognition".

So, yes, I chose to ignore that "teaching moment".

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
106. I asked Ken to explain ...
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:38 AM
Nov 2015

... why AAs and PoCs over-whelmingly support HRC.

The first part of his reply was about "name recognition" being behind the support of "most" Hill supporters. As far as I'm concerned, that was the end of any meaningful discussion.

So I'm out of this conversation.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
108. Not being an AA or PoC ...
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:56 AM
Nov 2015

... my perceptions of why BS isn't connecting with that demographic would be mere conjecture.

But I have read the posts here by AAs and POCs as to why they are not "feelin' the Bern", and they tell their stories most succinctly and eloquently.

You (and others here) would benefit greatly from hearing what they have to say, instead of dismissing them as supporting HRC because of name recognition, or failing to recognize that because BS marched wit MLK, that should be enough "cred" to win their support, or insinuating that they don't KNOW "what's in their own best interest".

You want a "teaching moment"? Try listening to what people are actually SAYING. You might just learn something.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
110. That's a cop out.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 03:05 AM
Nov 2015

You asked him to explain what he thought was the issue.
I'm asking you the same question.
I was expecting you to give your opinion.

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
111. Oh, I have my opinions ...
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 03:14 AM
Nov 2015

... as to why BS isn't getting any traction among AAs and PoCs.

But I think their opinions are more to the point, and far more relevant than mine.

And their opinions have been posted here regularly. You might try reading them.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
113. According to this
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 04:00 AM
Nov 2015
http://www.theroot.com/articles/politics/2015/10/bernie_sanders_why_black_voters_still_aren_t_feeling_him.html

It has a lot less to do with the perceived (and projected) failings of Bernie and his "horrible supporters" than many on this board would like you to believe. The takeaway from the linked article is that it's a confluence of culture, religion, age, and brand loyalty.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
64. Well there's your just reward for trying to be fair and open minded.
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 01:40 AM
Nov 2015

Frankly I don't agree with your original post because I do feel this "racial issue" has been a product of 2 things:

1.) A built affinity for the Clinton Brand among the African American voters that goes back many years of history.

2.) A conscious effort by the Clinton camp to leverage this affinity into a cudgel against Sanders and his supporters as if he and they are somehow defective because this affinity exists.

He doesn't get the black vote, ergo he has a "black problem".

Because he has a "black problem" he doesn't get the black vote.

It become circular self-proving reasoning.

So here you are trying to offer a token of peace and show some humility but what do you get...snark.

Sanders campaign "is circling the drain". Was that crap even necessary?

And then if you don't say things exactly right and bow down and kowtow in just the right way "you just don't get it".

Look, you can't win.

No amount of contrition or "understanding" can win this situation because this really isn't about Sanders, you, or his supporters' on the net "understanding" or "getting it".

This is about political power and the cynical use thereof.


blackspade

(10,056 posts)
102. I don't disagree with you about the 'racial issue's" origin....
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 01:57 AM
Nov 2015

But the over-reaction to the meme has bit the campaign and it's supporters on the ass as Ken describes.

We have to refocus on why our candidate is better on POC issues and then let them decide.

Bread and Circus

(9,454 posts)
130. Getting the over reaction was the whole goal.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:05 AM
Nov 2015

It's a "when did you stop beating your wife?" frame.

It infers guilt before any proof. It wrong foots your opponent.

It suggests creates tension where there was none.

MuseRider

(34,111 posts)
77. I agree with you
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 11:29 AM
Nov 2015

but do not have the time to write more at this moment. Will return.

Just adding right now, this goes both ways, sideways and all around. You are not telling people what to do but asking them to listen better to what is being said and be less reactionary and more understanding.

Thank you.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
92. Speaking of "just stop"...
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:41 AM
Nov 2015

Unless you have any evidence of making that statement, I'd just stop making it. Not only is it pure horse shit, but no roses would ever come out of it, it's such horse shit.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
93. Agreed. Bravenak's stalkers are a good example.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:50 AM
Nov 2015

And she is not alone.
If half the amount of effort some of these folks spend on alert stalking was spent on promoting their candidate things would be awesome around here.
We could be actually talking about issues and how to crush the GOP in 2016 not matter who our candidates are.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
114. Sure. Now just find me any Bernies supporters who are "attacking" people of color
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 04:03 AM
Nov 2015

and I'll remove you from my ignore list.

Pure, unadulterated horse shit.

seaglass

(8,173 posts)
122. I'd like to get your unbiased thoughts on this...
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 08:06 AM
Nov 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=467809

a self-deleted, unhidden post with no apology:

Star Member Zorra (25,427 posts)
3. I've already resigned myself to a complete republican takeover of the government in

2016.

All these threats and the race nagging has truly driven me to not give a shit anymore.

I'll vote for bernie in the primary and then maybe join the Green party if he doesn't win.
 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
137. I don't see an "attack" on anyone.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:09 PM
Nov 2015

I don't know Zorra very well, so I can't speak to that poster's motivations with much accuracy, but I'd say the deleted post was issued out of frustration.

And I understand that frustration - the 'outrage' over Sanders' 'race problem' has been entirely manufactured.

seaglass

(8,173 posts)
139. You didn't see that as an attack on Bravenak suggesting she was race nagging? Would she have to
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:29 PM
Nov 2015

have literally typed Bravenak you are race nagging for you to agree that this was an attack on her? Do you not consider accusing someone of race nagging to be attacking?

Lots of people say things from frustration, that doesn't make it not an attack.

If we cannot agree that it was an attack then there is no common ground between us on this.


 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
142. Bravenak likes to antagonize people to get a reaction.
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 05:05 AM
Nov 2015

It should surprise anyone when she gets one.

ArcticFox

(1,249 posts)
116. Who are these people?
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 05:03 AM
Nov 2015

I keep hearing they're out there, like someone wants me to feel like I'm falling in with a bad crowd of Bernie supporters. Funny thing is, I never meet a Bernie supporter who didn't want to lift up everyone this society has been kicking down all these years.

MFM008

(19,816 posts)
117. glad to see us all pull together
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 05:16 AM
Nov 2015

to defeat the republicans.............. NOT. We had all better agree to support our nominee no matter WHO it is or we have handed the fate of the USA and the world over to a LUNATIC. I supposrt HRC, but if Bernie is the nominee I will support him. End of story. Get with the program or the republicraps will leave no place to run to.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»To those Bernie supporter...