2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumStop Hillary! Vote no to a Clinton dynasty November 2014 issue Harper's Magazine
What is the case for Hillary (whose quasi-official website identifies her, in bold blue letters, by her first name only, as do millions upon millions of voters)? It boils down to this: She has experience, shes a woman, and its her turn. Its hard to find any substantive political argument in her favor. She has, in the past, been associated with womens issues, with childrens issues but she also encouraged her husband to sign the 1996 bill that put an end to the Aid to Families with Dependent Children program (AFDC), which had been in effect since 1935. Indeed, longtime Clinton adviser Dick Morris, who has now morphed into a right-wing pundit, credits Hillary for backing both of Bills most important moves to the center: the balanced budget and welfare reform.1 And during her subsequent career as New Yorks junior senator and as secretary of state, she has scarcely budged from the centrist sweet spot, and has become increasingly hawkish on foreign policy.
What Hillary will deliver, then, is more of the same. And that shouldnt surprise us. As wacky as it sometimes appears on the surface, American politics has an amazing stability and continuity about it. Obama, widely viewed as a populist action hero during the 2008 campaign, made no bones about his admiration for Ronald Reagan. The Gipper, he said,
changed the trajectory of America in a way that Richard Nixon did not and in a way that Bill Clinton did not. He put us on a fundamentally different path because the country was ready for it. I think they felt [that] with all the excesses of the Sixties and the Seventies, government had grown and grown, but there wasnt much sense of accountability in terms of how it was operating.
http://harpers.org/archive/2014/10/stop-hillary-2/
MineralMan
(146,314 posts)It stopped being relevant, politically, a long time ago.
brentspeak
(18,290 posts)MineralMan
(146,314 posts)will change anything. I still make them, though, as do you.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)No thanks.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Didn't need to go any further than that. One of the most painful things to watch with declining print media is people writing for Walmart like compensation. This is what you end up with.
Nitram
(22,802 posts)Nothing to see here folks...
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Right Wing?
Nitram
(22,802 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 9, 2015, 01:14 PM - Edit history (1)
DLC and New Democrats, it walks like Hillary forget the duck
Doug Henwood (born December 7, 1952) is an American journalist, economic analyst, and financial trader who writes frequently about economic affairs. He publishes a newsletter, Left Business Observer, that analyzes economics and politics from a left-wing perspective, is co-owner and co-editor, along with Phillipa Dunne, of The Liscio Report, an independent newsletter focusing on macroeconomic analysis, and is a contributing editor at The Nation.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)and hope it sticks..........
pinebox
(5,761 posts)brentspeak
(18,290 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)from the Clinton gallery I know I hit the bull's-eye.....
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Yea, that's real good bulls-eye.
Nitram
(22,802 posts)I just stop reading.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)I get annoyed when a woman's qualifications are so easily dismissed. What qualifies ANYONE to run for president? "Oh, he's been a governor/senator" ... sure, he's qualified to run. "Oh, she's only been a senator/Secretary of State" ...not qualified.
Agree or disagree with her, but if an article starts the way this one has, it's sexist underpants are sticking out.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...and LESS Reagan.
They both "changed the trajectory of America" .... but in a GOOD way.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)Hillary isn't a dynasty--she's not Bill's daughter.
Flying Squirrel
(3,041 posts)"[Obama] kills suspected terrorists whom his predecessor would merely have tortured."
Merely?